USAF pulling out of Fairford
Thread Starter
USAF pulling out of Fairford
BBC NEWS | UK | England | Gloucestershire | US Air Force to pull out of base
RAF Fairford is to stand down to a "care and maintenance" state next year as the USAF pulls out. The RIAT will continue to use Fairford.
Now wouldn't it have been cheaper to move Lyneham planes there instead of spending ££££'s at Brize.
RAF Fairford is to stand down to a "care and maintenance" state next year as the USAF pulls out. The RIAT will continue to use Fairford.
Now wouldn't it have been cheaper to move Lyneham planes there instead of spending ££££'s at Brize.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nr.EGHI, UK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vernon,
Were there not proposals some years ago to move the Harriers from Wittering to Bentwaters/Woodbridge when the A10's moved out? The reason that didn't happen was because most of the domestic electricity supply was US standard 110V, allegedly. The cost of conversion to 230/240v failed the cost benefit analysis.
I guess the same would apply to Fairford.
Were there not proposals some years ago to move the Harriers from Wittering to Bentwaters/Woodbridge when the A10's moved out? The reason that didn't happen was because most of the domestic electricity supply was US standard 110V, allegedly. The cost of conversion to 230/240v failed the cost benefit analysis.
I guess the same would apply to Fairford.
vernon99 said:
As well as that, what about the squillions that must have been spent on all that runway resurfacing, ASP and hangar construction a few years ago at FFD!
Maybe our US cousins are as bad as us at wasting their defence budget!
Now wouldn't it have been cheaper to move Lyneham planes there instead of spending ££££'s at Brize
Maybe our US cousins are as bad as us at wasting their defence budget!
Nice idea but ....
The news article talks about it remaining an active field (unlike Woodbridge and Bentwaters) capable of reactivation at 24-48hrs notice (which, to be honest, as I understand it is not much different to what it is now). I guess when Uncle Sam wishes to do a bit more expeditionary policing it won't want to find its airbase covered in C130 / A400 (ho, ho) / C17 etc, all its hangars full of hangar queens, the BX replaced by a SPAR etc. It will require a lot of care and maintenance to continue to host RIAT mind.
Besides it would cost the MOD far too much money to deactivate the Burger King, bowling alley, cinema, baseball diamond, golf course....
Good option for a bolthole when Brize isn't ready on time though!
The news article talks about it remaining an active field (unlike Woodbridge and Bentwaters) capable of reactivation at 24-48hrs notice (which, to be honest, as I understand it is not much different to what it is now). I guess when Uncle Sam wishes to do a bit more expeditionary policing it won't want to find its airbase covered in C130 / A400 (ho, ho) / C17 etc, all its hangars full of hangar queens, the BX replaced by a SPAR etc. It will require a lot of care and maintenance to continue to host RIAT mind.
Besides it would cost the MOD far too much money to deactivate the Burger King, bowling alley, cinema, baseball diamond, golf course....
Good option for a bolthole when Brize isn't ready on time though!
Yup, it will be civvie contract staffed.
A USAF guy I'm working with told me earlier this year that they were actively recruiting for this with a view to pulling out serving staff by next year.
He's also said that the USAF will likely pull out of Mildenhall and Lakenheath as well before too long.
A USAF guy I'm working with told me earlier this year that they were actively recruiting for this with a view to pulling out serving staff by next year.
He's also said that the USAF will likely pull out of Mildenhall and Lakenheath as well before too long.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I understand it, it means all uniformed American (Military) employees will be dispersed to other locations (which can be recalled in 24-48 hours for Fairford to be activated). The base will now be maintained by the remaining non-uniform (Civilian - Mainly British) employees. However up to 100 civilians will sadly also loose their jobs as part of this cut.
As Wrathmonk says, the activation time isn't much longer than the current time.
Fairford will remain the host to RIAT and also Deployed Operations Training Exercise.
Mike
As Wrathmonk says, the activation time isn't much longer than the current time.
Fairford will remain the host to RIAT and also Deployed Operations Training Exercise.
Mike
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fairford Future use?
Bad news for those who work there and may loose there jobs.
Given that RAF Lyneham is to close in 2011/12 and Brize will be very busy, if Fairford is to continue to be maintained, why not use it as the base for the repatriation of those British personnel killed on ops?
Given that RAF Lyneham is to close in 2011/12 and Brize will be very busy, if Fairford is to continue to be maintained, why not use it as the base for the repatriation of those British personnel killed on ops?
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fairfords buildings will be maintained by civilians. However there will be no-one on base to man Air Traffic Control and there will be very limited Fire support (not enough to handle a C-17). So for Fairford to handle aircraft, they will need to call in a large amount of people from various locations for various jobs to handle an aircraft.
I imagine Brize will take repatriations back when Lyneham closes, not sure what will happen to MEDA then though...
Mike
I imagine Brize will take repatriations back when Lyneham closes, not sure what will happen to MEDA then though...
Mike
Hnnmmm whats the odds that Lakenheath and Mildenhall will close within the next decade? 50/50, 60-40, 70-30.
Then that means Alconbury and Molesworth and Croughton will also have to shut.
Thought it be more important for the Pentagon to keep bases in the UK for a number of reasons and not for the half to a century agreement(s) but more that the UK is a trusted ally.
Ok say for example the above went then what would happen to say support for Menwith Hill go as it comes under the 501st at Alconbury.
Molesworth is pretty important as it is as well as MH.
Then that means Alconbury and Molesworth and Croughton will also have to shut.
Thought it be more important for the Pentagon to keep bases in the UK for a number of reasons and not for the half to a century agreement(s) but more that the UK is a trusted ally.
Ok say for example the above went then what would happen to say support for Menwith Hill go as it comes under the 501st at Alconbury.
Molesworth is pretty important as it is as well as MH.
We used Fairford for 3* and 4* squadrons when the C130K entered service. A certain supersonic airliner was also based there for testing. Happy days.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Stars
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't the Americans now have bases and/or agreements with East European and muslim countries of the former USSR. With that in place they are now closer to conflict zones than being in blighty. I don't know if there is a need to stop for refuelling in the UK or can they reach Frankfurt instead when transiting from the US.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NW FL
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reason that didn't happen was because most of the domestic electricity supply was US standard 110V, allegedly. The cost of conversion to 230/240v failed the cost benefit analysis.
Guess Obama has other ideas about the Strategic power base and the 'special relationship'.
When will that Scots wretch have the grace to step down before he does any more damage to this once great nation?
When will that Scots wretch have the grace to step down before he does any more damage to this once great nation?
How long before the Belvedere plan gets exhumed and some beancounter says "Fairford would be a great SH Superbase......"
Mind you, if they kept the BX open!
Much better idea - forget all the nonsense of C130s at BZN, move them to FFD. While you're at it, close that ghastly Movers' themepark at South Cerney and put it there too!
Mind you, if they kept the BX open!
Much better idea - forget all the nonsense of C130s at BZN, move them to FFD. While you're at it, close that ghastly Movers' themepark at South Cerney and put it there too!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: england
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or just take the sensible option, and keep Lyneham open saving all the time, money, hassle and disruption of personel and operations moving both C-130 fleets from an established, dedicated operating base? 
Thread Starter
Too late for that, they have already spent a fortune concreting over Brize Norton! But keeping Lyneham open would have been cheaper, at a time when money is scarce. Ok in 10-20 years time, it might start to be marginally more expensive, but hopefully the economy will be better by then.