Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

US E-3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Aug 2009, 18:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 587
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
US E-3

From the Las Vegas Review-Journal (spam version of the Northern Scot)

32-member crew escapes

Plane damaged while landing at Nellis AFB

A plane was damaged while landing at Nellis Air Force Base late Friday, causing the plane to catch fire and forcing its 32-member crew to escape.

The E-3 Sentry warning and control system, also known as an AWACS, was being flown by the 552nd Air Control Wing out of Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma, according to a Nellis spokesman.

The crew was deployed to Nellis as part of the base's Red Flag exercises and was returning from a mission when the incident occurred. Officials did not say how the aircraft was damaged.

Emergency crews at the base quickly extinguished the flames and the plane was evacuated safely.

Investigators have not determined the cause of the accident.
PPRuNeUser0139 is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2009, 20:48
  #2 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Looks like too many pies in the front for the landing...everyone out OK though.

Two's in is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2009, 08:50
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Back in Geordie Land
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats a hell of a crew - 32!!

How many hangers-on must there have been on board I wonder?

Pleased everyone got out OK

Winco
Winco is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2009, 08:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,816
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
How many hangers-on must there have been on board I wonder?
30 ?

OK, OK- I'll get me coat.....

Seriously though, thank heavens everyone was safe.
BEagle is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2009, 09:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Regaining Track
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I prefer to crash and burn on the strip
sonicstomp is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2009, 23:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Uranus
Posts: 958
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
In the immortal words of SR, "You say that Sonic...But if the FE had used the 'Johnson Bar', as he was taught, it would not have happened..."

The B Word
The B Word is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2009, 02:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey BEagle...does that mean the E-3 doesn't carry an FE?

Otherwise I don't agree with your deduction!

Cheers,

FD
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2009, 04:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The E-3C Sentry carries a crew of 20 consisting of pilot (aircraft commander), co-pilot, navigator, flight engineer and 16 AWACS mission specialists. The rear-cabin crew is under a mission crew commander, and includes weapon controllers, radar operators and communications specialists.

So... 12 "looky-Lou"s.

GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2009, 04:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Republic of the Philippines ex L1011 GE
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can teach a monkey how to ride a bike, but have you ever seen a monkey fix one?

You would not be a driver without groundcrew.....
pigsinspace is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2009, 07:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Age: 67
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 13 Posts
First, the crew of 32 means that it was probably a full-up qualification/training mission, ie there would instructors or evaluators on board - if those are 'looky-Lous", fine.

Second, if my information is correct, the nose-gear doors would not open. And if the doors won't open, it doesn't matter how big your Johnson is!
Fortissimo is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2009, 11:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here 'n' there.
Age: 53
Posts: 33
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some T-cut and a respray and she'll be fine!
jez_s is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2009, 13:43
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Second, if my information is correct, the nose-gear doors would not open.

Hmmm, so a known nose gear problem before landing and the decison was to take it in to Nellis and not Edwards?

Could be, but...
brickhistory is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2009, 14:17
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Back in Geordie Land
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
brickhistory, Why Edwards and NOT Nellis?

Nellis has 2 runways, instead of one thus ops, landings and departures can all continue with just a bit of reshuffling.
Take it to Edwards with a problem and the potential to black the runway and suddenly you loose 100% of your runways - not a good idea.

Presumably all of the groundcrew, kit etc were at Nellis, so if I was the Captain, Nellis would have been my first choice also. bags of room etc. etc.

And lets face it, after an incident like that, you all need to get down to the strip and party, aswell as do some gambling. Clearly it is your lucky day!!

Well done to all concerned again.

Winco
Winco is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2009, 14:50
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Winco,

I don't in any way criticize the actions of the crew and second the "well done to all" if that is the impression of my post.

I am a little leery of a known gear problem being handled at Nellis and not at one of several other alternatives. Such a known problem would involve many phone patches to Boeing, mother Tinker, etc, etc.

Any number of factors to which I am not privy could have resulted in the Nellis outcome which is why I hedged my post with a "Could be."

Doesn't change my gut feeling on it being a surprise to the crew when the nose came down much further than normal however.

The facts will come from the investigation, and I await those with interest.
brickhistory is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2009, 20:09
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 587
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More on the Nellis E-3C

Doesn't look too clever this..





PPRuNeUser0139 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2009, 08:06
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of interest, and just at face value, does that appear to be beyond economic repair? How valuable an asset is it and how would that consideration impact on the 'clench your buttocks and just sign the repair cheque' aspect of things? I suppose that if it were just a civvy airliner, it could be written off that much easier?
Al R is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2009, 08:47
  #17 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,492
Received 101 Likes on 58 Posts
The E-3C Sentry carries a crew of 20 consisting of pilot (aircraft commander), co-pilot, navigator, flight engineer and 16 AWACS mission specialists. The rear-cabin crew is under a mission crew commander, and includes weapon controllers, radar operators and communications specialists.
What...no Political Officer?
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2009, 13:51
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think we would all be surprised just how little damage the frame has suffered, working on the premis that from experience it generally looks worse than it is. If you scrub off the soot, the skin is probably intact, with surprisingly little damage underneath. No doubt it was jacked up fairly sharpish, the nose gear lowered and towed into a shed in not too many hours.

Good job by the crew; glad no-one was hurt.
FJJP is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2009, 17:55
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 587
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some clearer images of the Nellis E-3C here:





It will be interesting to see how long it takes to repair that little lot..
(and how many $$$)

Looks like the skin has more than a few holes in it.

sv
PPRuNeUser0139 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2009, 18:10
  #20 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Given the airframe age, probably about 30, and the lower utiliasation recently ( I guess) I wonder if they will bother?
Pontius Navigator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.