Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

A strange question

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

A strange question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Aug 2009, 00:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: November18
Age: 48
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A strange question

Please excuse the vagueness but I really cant go into too much detail.
Basically: A soldier who died in action...

Somebody now deciding to tell "their story" in magazines etc. Family are quite distressed about this. Is there anything they can actually do about this?

Last edited by x213a; 18th Aug 2009 at 00:20.
x213a is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 00:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Republic of the Philippines ex L1011 GE
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes,

Dont buy the magazine
pigsinspace is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 00:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Depends on the "teller". Are they mil? Did they cstep over any lines in the sand?

Whether or not mil, did they slander or libel anyone?

If it was a simple case of say, "I always thought Fred was a fool" then there's not much you can do about it officially. It's just a point of view. But then there's more than one way to skin a cat. If "the teller" has been bad mouthing a fallen comrade, I'm sure the relevant regimental association would have its ways and means.

I find it sad that people would disrespect fallen soldiers.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 00:39
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: November18
Age: 48
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basically its claiming to be closer than they actually were and using it as a platform.
Not aware of anything libellous.
x213a is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 07:35
  #5 (permalink)  

FX Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Greenwich
Age: 67
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only way I see about this is that a member of the family contacts someone like Max Clifford or somesuch to do 'here are the facts' type thing, probably to a rival publication.

Money should be obtained and given to Help for Heroes or the like.

Either this, or a dignified silence knowing that those who knew him know the real facts.

Awkward, my smpathies to you/your friends.
angels is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 08:26
  #6 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
x213a, a similar issue may have existed after GW1 where two people, now world-famous authors, wrote up the same incident but put quite different interpretations on it.

claiming to be closer than they actually were
Touch of the Walts perhaps?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 13:01
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: November18
Age: 48
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe there may now be a phenomenon such as a "fiancee walt". They have suffered one round of this already in the media, looks like the person concerned has decided theres more mileage in this. I really cant explain any further as I dont want to compromise identity - that is not my call.

Thanks for the replies.
x213a is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 13:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,578
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
It may be worth talking to a media lawyer to find out whether there are any privacy rights the families can claim. These stories don't appear to be in the public interest (the usual test for such coverage) and they will clearly cause additional distress to the families.

An alternative tack you may consider is to see if one of the pro-Forces tabloids would consider naming and shaming the publications in question (providing they are not from the same publishing stable).
dead_pan is online now  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 13:35
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: November18
Age: 48
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its an awkward situation. The family just want closure. They have had closure. This is somebody who keeps raking the coals once the initial wave of sympathy and attention subsided. Its hard to really explain without going into detail, which I am unable to do. Theres nothing unsavoury (to my knowledge) as such, its just a case of somebody using the death of a soldier to gain public sympathy.
x213a is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 18:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: london
Age: 48
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it in the new Chinook book per chance?
knocker88 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 18:54
  #11 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
knocker, I believe it is a little more mercenary than you suggest.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 19:20
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: london
Age: 48
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ah ok - still none the wiser but if its written and you can prove its not true - libel?
knocker88 is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 10:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
x213a, a similar issue may have existed after GW1 where two people, now world-famous authors, wrote up the same incident but put quite different interpretations on it.
And at least three other versions of the same story also published, all differing, one by a direct participant!
XV277 is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 10:27
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by knocker88
ah ok - still none the wiser but if its written and you can prove its not true - libel?
It's an old legal pronciple that you can't libel the dead.

Libel

About the only thing you could threaten the person with is in the circumstances hinted at is being exposed as a liar or walt - a few of the papers have taken to this with some relish in recent years.

There is a legal case where the family of Gladstone called a writer a liar, and he sued them but couldn't prove that he wasn't, so lost his case.

BBC NEWS | UK | Magazine | Can you say anything about the dead?


Sadly, I do know of one similar circumstance (some years ago) to the one the original poster hints at.
XV277 is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 21:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Closer than you think...
Age: 65
Posts: 390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'cough' er.. Post details on ARRSE maybe? tis amazing what the outrage bus can do on there!!! 'cough'



I reserve the right to deny I ever suggested letting ARRSE loose on the miscreant, I wasn't here right....
Always a Sapper is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.