EU Working Time Directive & SAR
Thread Starter
EU Working Time Directive & SAR
A source close to the SAR fleet recently expressed concern that the RAF's adoption of the EU Working Time Directive was going to directly impinge on the the Search and Rescue fleet's primary tasking.
Has this issue been resolved?
Has this issue been resolved?
Do you mean the bit where we man the FI on a flight by flight basis so that the losing flights (2 at any one time) will be down to 12 hour shifts (that's either 12 hours at night or 12 hours by day and effectively off-state for half the time)?
No, surely no-one would sign up to that - the FI fully manned whilst the UKSAR coverage is further compromised
No, surely no-one would sign up to that - the FI fully manned whilst the UKSAR coverage is further compromised
Nice try liedtoagain - it depends if the DVDs are 'educational' or not
As I understand it, although many EU countries have thrown out the WTD, Britain jumped the gun and had it enshrined in UK law so we are now compelled to abide by it.
Whereas in the 'Stan where there is a military imperative and EU WTD can be disregarded, the UKSARF has no military imperative and therefore no get out of jail card.
It is unfortunate that at the same time, some senior officers decided we could be reduced from 5 to 4 crews per flight (it takes 5.7 crews to man 24/7 SAR according to WTD rules) and we are now waiting for Ministers to see if they will 'accept/manage' the risk that having not enough people to do the job entails.
I doubt the Ministers will fully understand the implications of the WTD on SAR until there is an incident in one of their constituencies where life is lost because no SAR aircraft was available. I know this can already happen due to unserviceabilities or other tasking but it isn't the same as a premeditated reduction is UKSAR cover just to save money.
All the boll*cks about providing more crews to SH and putting the 'war' effort first is bluster - they could have more aircraft available in theatre tomorrow if they just provided enough spares; you can have as many aircraft and crews as you like (and we have plenty it seems) but without spares, the aircraft sit uselessly on the ground.
As I understand it, although many EU countries have thrown out the WTD, Britain jumped the gun and had it enshrined in UK law so we are now compelled to abide by it.
Whereas in the 'Stan where there is a military imperative and EU WTD can be disregarded, the UKSARF has no military imperative and therefore no get out of jail card.
It is unfortunate that at the same time, some senior officers decided we could be reduced from 5 to 4 crews per flight (it takes 5.7 crews to man 24/7 SAR according to WTD rules) and we are now waiting for Ministers to see if they will 'accept/manage' the risk that having not enough people to do the job entails.
I doubt the Ministers will fully understand the implications of the WTD on SAR until there is an incident in one of their constituencies where life is lost because no SAR aircraft was available. I know this can already happen due to unserviceabilities or other tasking but it isn't the same as a premeditated reduction is UKSAR cover just to save money.
All the boll*cks about providing more crews to SH and putting the 'war' effort first is bluster - they could have more aircraft available in theatre tomorrow if they just provided enough spares; you can have as many aircraft and crews as you like (and we have plenty it seems) but without spares, the aircraft sit uselessly on the ground.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes but a minister standing infront of crates of spares waxing lyrical about increasing capicty doesn't look half as good as a minister standing infront of a helicopter so new the paint is barely dry waxing lyrical about increasing capicity.
Thread Starter
It is unfortunate that at the same time, some senior officers decided we could be reduced from 5 to 4 crews per flight (it takes 5.7 crews to man 24/7 SAR according to WTD rules) and we are now waiting for Ministers to see if they will 'accept/manage' the risk that having not enough people to do the job entails.
I doubt the Ministers will fully understand the implications of the WTD on SAR until there is an incident in one of their constituencies where life is lost because no SAR aircraft was available.
I doubt the Ministers will fully understand the implications of the WTD on SAR until there is an incident in one of their constituencies where life is lost because no SAR aircraft was available.
Yes? No?
Wigwag - I believe the the SARF has presented 2Gp and upwards with a series of options if we are to try and man the SARF with 4 crews per flight and man the FI and comply with the WTD. Those options need to be signed off at Ministerial level because of the potentially disasterous effects on UK SAR cover. Along with much other stuff, I suspect these decisions have been delayed until after the Summer recess.
Thread Starter
Many thanks for your comments. I note that BALPA sorted out this situation for the Coastgaurd:
BALPA - SEARCH AND RESCUE PILOTS FLYING AGAIN
As a member of the public I find this political situation with the SAR fleet utterly disgraceful and will be making some enquiries.
BALPA - SEARCH AND RESCUE PILOTS FLYING AGAIN
As a member of the public I find this political situation with the SAR fleet utterly disgraceful and will be making some enquiries.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nr.EGHI, UK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'Day only' rescue helicopter plan
That BBC report sounds like a calculated piece of spin to defuse the EU issue. Call me a cynic but I wouldn't have put it past the MOD to have chucked that idea into the public domain without fully evaluating it.
