Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

US to deploy JDAM equipped Super Tucanos...

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

US to deploy JDAM equipped Super Tucanos...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jul 2009, 18:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
US to deploy JDAM equipped Super Tucanos...

Defense Tech: Secret Program Works to Field SEAL Plane

In light of all the comments made on here about the need for a cheap effective aircraft for COIN, maybe here you have the answer...

Views please
Yeoman_dai is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 18:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the rate we're going through Tonkers
Co-Captain is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 19:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Age: 61
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
quote,"WARHEADS ON FOREHEADS", what a charming phrase
mr fish is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 19:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,336
Received 81 Likes on 33 Posts
I wondered what was going to happen to Linton's "Tincans" when MFTS came along...

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 22:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Glesga, Scotland
Age: 51
Posts: 230
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would more A/OA-10's hogs not be better value for money?
obviously getting new frames might be expensive as i imagine the production line is long closed???

Also the AC-130s are they not better "bang per buck" ?

obviously if its cheap n chearfull you want this is probably the best option !

Last edited by fallmonk; 21st Jul 2009 at 22:24. Reason: error
fallmonk is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 22:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: troon
Age: 61
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cheap isnt always bad. If it works like the intruder did in Vietnam then why not?

The question is this - will it be as effective as what is in theatre already, there isonly one way to find out.
althenick is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 22:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Glesga, Scotland
Age: 51
Posts: 230
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry for slipping of the subject there but when doing a wee bit of digging.I came across this about the A-10.

"The A-10 is not exported to any other countries but it's believed that Turkey obtained at least 50 A-10 airframes."

A-10/OA-10 Thunderbolt 2

But cant find any other net storys to back it up. So is there any truth to this ? I dont think so but thought i would ask the more informed than me
fallmonk is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 22:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
I would be interested to see how quickly they can get them out on to ops. I can but only imagine it will be a hell of a lot quicker than our procurement processes which seem to hark back to WW2

From what I can gather, our procurement seems to be run along the lines of some boffin/engineer/company having an idea, pushing it out and regardless of its utility, it is accepted / rejected solely on the whim of someone in MOD with scant regard for the opinions of the end users.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 23:24
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd just put forwards that their cheap, to maintain and crucially, operate, small logs footprint, can operate further forwards nearer FOBS than higher performance jets, can loiter longer, have two crew to deal with the flying/surveillance workload, has a good mixture of big bang JDAM's and show of force .50 cals, and a excellent sensor fit.

Seems perfect to be honest. I'd just like to see the final unit cost.
Yeoman_dai is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 01:10
  #10 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,501
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Have they solved the issue with wake turbulance from the missile launch?
Buster Hyman is online now  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 07:30
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,821
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
for the sensor suite and weapon potential.

But single engine? Wouldn't the OV-10D Bronco be a better platform?
BEagle is online now  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 07:48
  #12 (permalink)  
Rigger1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
How many Hawk T1s are we about to retire, most with good airframe life left in them .... a new wing, easy to fit on the Hawk - 6 bolts, already designed for the T2, a simple armament system, hey presto, a cheap effective counter insurgency aircraft.

We have the spares and support systems in place, most of our front line pilots have experience in it, it's fast, manoeuvrable, cheap to operate ..... you get my drift.
 
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 07:57
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: E MIDLANDS
Posts: 291
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I thought that "our" Tucanos" didn't have the strengthend wings for hardpoints, so we couldn't do the same thing, even if we wanted to?
andyy is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 07:58
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have seen a couple of threads in other places talking about the "Return" of the OV10. New builds to the original design with updated avionics. Would be an interesting project.
NURSE is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 09:55
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fallmonk

The U.S. is the only operator of the A-10. Along with Turkey the other country that apparently expressed an interest was Jordan. Neither country received any examples.

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 10:24
  #16 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought that "our" Tucanos" didn't have the strengthend wings for hardpoints, so we couldn't do the same thing, even if we wanted to?
I believe that is correct.
Gainesy is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 11:07
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rigger1

Wouldn't the Hawk T.1 be limited by its current engine in the likes of Afghanistan? Especially carrying a load? The general consensus was that the Jaguar could only have alleviated the burden on the Harrier force due to the limitations of load carrying and extreme temperatures. Wouldn't the Hawk T.1 carrying a useful load struggle?

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 11:36
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sandhurst
Age: 50
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying over a 'normal' enemies territory with a single engine is one thing, flying of the Talebans is a bit different.

Think I would also rather sit in a nice big titanium 'bathtub' and have the ability to lose a rudder and elevator or part of the wing.
GPMG is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 12:40
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK/Philippines/Italy
Age: 73
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have seen a couple of threads in other places talking about the "Return" of the OV10. New builds to the original design with updated avionics. Would be an interesting project.
Philippine Air Force is currently running a programme to zero time all its OV10s. Not sure of the avionics but word is new guns, props and gearboxes.

Should be a good piece of kit.
larssnowpharter is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 22:19
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any links for this new build bronco?
Yeoman_dai is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.