Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

De-confliction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jul 2009, 19:41
  #1 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 82
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
De-confliction

Watching 'Air Medics' which is about the work of the Great North Air Ambulance. A thought occurred to me as they flew around the hills and valleys of the Lake District and Northumberland at low level, how do they de-conflict with fast pointy things doing the same thing, bearing in mind they go at a moments notice and even if they told the low-level cell it would be too late to pass onto an aircraft already in the system?
green granite is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2009, 20:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TCAS?

Fast pointy things will be squalking Mode 3C, so should show up if they are equipped.

Otherwise, sticking to >500' AGL is a good idea. Fast pointy things will whizz below, and TBH, they should be doing this anyway to comply with the ANO.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2009, 20:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 651
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Otherwise, sticking to >500' AGL is a good idea. Fast pointy things will whizz below,
Not all fast pointy things are allowed to go below 500' AGL. Take the F-15Es from Lakenheath as an example: their USAFE regs prohibit anything below 500', so most of the time they are between that and 1,000' AGL.

So, I don't think that staying above 500' is a particularly solid bet!
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2009, 20:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Behind the wire.
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Effective You can't mitigate all risks. At the end of the day flying is inherently risky. This is why I’m angered when I see GA traffic at <1000ft…. there is just no need (excusing the obvious) help us and yourselves and fly at a sensible height.
High_Expect is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2009, 20:44
  #5 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 82
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fast pointy things will whizz below, and TBH, they should be doing this anyway to comply with the ANO
Bear in mind they often have to land in remote places to evacuate the casualty so have to be passing through that level anyway.
green granite is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2009, 21:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
even if they were to warn into the low flying system (a military only process), all we get as users of the LFAs is a warning that there is going to be "mixed traffic" in the areas we have booked into. It's a stats gathering exercise to help us justify using the LFAs, not a deconfliction system. As soon as you get below safety alt, it is a mainly visual exercise, pointing the radar somewhere sensible if you have one (though rarely focusing on the scope unless that is your main job as a nav/WSO). Eyes out peeps.
gashman is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2009, 23:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: under da thumb
Posts: 20
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Open FIR guys, see and be seen. Below 1000' isn't mil only territory just as much as final approach tracks to civie airports aren't only for civie aircraft. As for "Fast pointy things will be squalking Mode 3C", not always the case, would help if they did. Greatest worry for them should be the Tucs, whoever thought fitting them with TCAS was a good idea?
rata2e is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 05:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TDAs? or maybe thats only the multi car pile up.
mugwuffin is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 09:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wherever my hat is.
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's wrong with Tucano TCAS?

NMRL
Notmyreallogin is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 09:24
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: .
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought that TCAS automatically went from TA/RA to TA only below 1000' (does anybody know any types where it doesn't?)
Therefore, below 1000' you'll have SA of the other type, but since you are both LL, both (I would expect) would want to pull up to avoid = Potential for collision.
Perhaps a rule whereby <1000' RW could descend and FW could climb?
(However, this only allows for dissimilar types)
Suggestions??
Rote_8 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 09:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kettering
Age: 49
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of the two East Mids Air Ambulances, one has TCAS (G-MEDS) and the other (G-WNAA) does not. Just have to keep a good lookout!
Bob the Doc is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 20:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,838
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
RW could descend
In close encounters with fast jets, I would always go down, safe in the knowledge that they wouldn't.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 22:14
  #13 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 428 Likes on 226 Posts
There's a joke about fast women in there somewhere...
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 23:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,838
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
Also, the sort of TCAS carried by Police helicopters, and probably the Air Ambulances, is not 100% reliable. Targets will appear in false positions at times and also disappear then reappear. Plus, it's for info only, it doesn't offer any avoidance advice.
MightyGem is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.