Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Effect of aircraft selection on training results?!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Effect of aircraft selection on training results?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jun 2009, 19:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Effect of aircraft selection on training results?!

Hi Everyone,

I would like to know your opinions.

Do you think it is suitable to train pilot cadets directly onto jets?? Or will you have better results training initially on light pistons and progressing to jets?

For example, until recently the Israelis trained 10hrs on pipers(screening) then went directly to Fougers - A4 - front line jet.

I know the RAFs present training syllabus, however, I believe there was a period when some pilots were trained directly onto Jet Provost(correct me if wrong).

Is the desicion to have light piston trainers purely financial, or due to high washout rates when directly trained on high performance aircraft?

All opinions or pointers in the direction of good articles will be gratefully received.

Many thanks
SLIPANDSKID is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2009, 20:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Modern single seater jets are too easy to fly - oodles of easily-controlled excess power and agility, huge electronically protected flight envelope, draggy airframe to give plenty of speed stability, no assymetric secondary control effects worth talking about etc etc. If all military pilots trained on jets ab-initio, there would be no way to cream off the guys and gals good enough to fly the tricky stuff like RW and heavy ME....

Last edited by CirrusF; 16th Jun 2009 at 20:19.
CirrusF is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2009, 20:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: scotland
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
I suspect that it is due to the inevitable high washout rate. In the days of straight on to JPs the washout was in the order of 25%. Grading by piston trainers probably produces a similar washout rate, but at a far lower cost.
CharlieJuliet is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2009, 21:05
  #4 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I thought todays training route was Atari, MS Flight Sim, Reaper?
 
Old 18th Jun 2009, 08:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: lincs
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Straight through training

I went straight through on the JP and there was certainly a relatively large chop rate, but now too long ago to confirm whether my course at Syerston reached or exceeded that level.

However, I do recall that a proportion of graduates from initial office training at South Cerney were sent to get time on the Chipmunk before going on to the JP. Either it was part of a random trial or, I guess, because of marginal results in the aptitude tests.
Oblique96 is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2009, 08:58
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Oblique

Yep, I certainly remember the RAF trumpeting "all through jet training" in it's recruiting material when I was a lad , but that route was certainly completely closed by the time I was instructing on the JP in the mid-80's I suspect anecdotaly it was due to high "wash out" rates but I don't recall seeing any statistics.

If the studes had UAS (Bulldog) time or significant civilian time they did the "short" JP Basic course. Anyone who was had never flown was sent off to Syerston to be "graded" on the Chipmunk ( around 10-15 hours I think), if they passed they then did the "Long" Basic JP Course.
wiggy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.