Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

North Korea kicking off

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

North Korea kicking off

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th May 2009, 10:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: in the training office
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
North Korea kicking off

Is the problem of North Korea becoming more than just a local issue?
The local news report that the UK have dispatched a VC10 to 'sniff the air' in Japan, along with a unit from the USAF.

What options are open should UN sanctions fail?
Adam Nams is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 10:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Learn the Korean for " I'll keep him distracted while you guys in white coats sneak up " ?
Double Zero is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 10:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sandhurst
Age: 50
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He's so ronrey, so vewy vewy ronrey.......

Perhaps China can prove that it is one of the good guys and just snuff the little chap out.
GPMG is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 11:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South of the North
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
North Korea kicking off
Ah the great British art of understatement. A country which is testing nuclear weapons and delivery systems, and has withdrawn a longterm truce with it's neighbour starts making threatening noises and we describe it as "kicking off". Makes you proud to be British!
Sook is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 12:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sandhurst
Age: 50
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that the British state of readiness has been raised to 'mildly perturbed'.
GPMG is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 12:44
  #6 (permalink)  

Inter Arma Enim Silentius Lex Legis
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you will find that's "mildly disturbed"
The Gorilla is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 12:49
  #7 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the British state of readiness has been raised to 'mildly perturbed'.
I say! Steady on old chap.


BUT,

What if, let's say, the Koreans weren't really dumb and the Great Leader wasn't so vewy, vewy ronery? What if they've studied the NATO plan for Europe up in the Great Leader Staff College. Remember? The one where the conflict would remain conventional until the Soviet advance into Germany reached a certain "trigger" point, at which theatre nuclear weapons would be brought into use? The one that has so far successfully discouraged them from trying to visit the south.

Now they have a nuclear response capability they may feel confident enough to try overwhelming the southern defences with their million plus army of fanantical high step dancers. You nuke us and we vapourise Tokyo and all that stuff.


We'd certainly need a couple of VC10 loads of Pongoes to beef up the conventional forces in S.Korea if that turned out to be the case. S.Korea and the USA simply don't have the conventional forces to spare for tackling a conventional ground war against the North Korean chorus line.

Don't mind me, I'm onry trying to think rike a vewy, vewy ronery Gwate Weader
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 13:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pre-emtive strike justified?
VinRouge is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 13:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pre-emtive strike justified?
It seems to becoming just that... Otherwise horses, stables and doors come to mind.
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 13:41
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a short video here of the last VC-10 sampling mission from Japan - 2006. One of the pods can be seen under the port wing.

Right click on the video to zoom in.

“úƒeƒŒNEWS24

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 15:30
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
People always forget just how capable and well armed the South Korean armed Forces are. Short of Nuclear war, they and their Northern Cousins would have a right old dust up but they certainly wouldn't be overwhelmed in double quick time. Plus, another thing that slips from peoples minds is the amount of US troops already in South Korea - 1 Brigade I think, at the moment, with plenty more in the US for deployment if it got really nasty - the extra Afghan 'surge' notwithstanding.

I also would say Australia and Japan would have something to say about it.

Long and the short, we aren't needed.
Yeoman_dai is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 15:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The 'Bat Cave' @ HLP in the Big Durian Indo
Age: 61
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe he's been watching too many re-runs of Team America in his home cinema ?

Now Kim Jong Il is getting on a bit he personally has a lot less to lose and is the sort of guy mad enough to follow through on his sabre rattling.

YouTube - Kim Jong Il Inevitable

Last edited by aseanaero; 29th May 2009 at 05:14.
aseanaero is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 21:35
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
People always forget just how capable and well armed the South Korean armed Forces are. Short of Nuclear war, they and their Northern Cousins would have a right old dust up but they certainly wouldn't be overwhelmed in double quick time. Plus, another thing that slips from peoples minds is the amount of US troops already in South Korea - 1 Brigade I think, at the moment, with plenty more in the US for deployment if it got really nasty - the extra Afghan 'surge' notwithstanding.

I also would say Australia and Japan would have something to say about it.

Long and the short, we aren't needed.
Agree, in the main about the ROK forces.

Not so much on the Americans' numbers. They will be little more than a speed bump, but serve as a tripwire deterrent to the North and any plans to come south.

That said, if China doesn't pull some strings, then the US will most likely do zip as China will use this to its advantage - sends all those pesky, hungry refugees south and not across it's own border, also further ties up the US and, perhaps, enable the PRC's own little adventure across the Taiwan Strait.

So many handy US wars combined with the majority of US debt in Chinese hands would pretty much gaurentee the PRC asking, politely of course, for the US to not interfere.

Realistically, how soon could Australia, Japan, or Britain get to the fray?

Not soon enough to do any good or in the numbers required once they were there.

If this is more than nuclear sabre rattling to get attention/money/oil, then the South Koreans will stand or fall pretty much on their own.
brickhistory is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 22:25
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
China doesn't need to do anything across the Taiwan strait - the Taiwanese - now Chen Shui Bian is under trial and the DPP very much out of favour - are pretty much running towards the Chinese with open arms; and the Chinese are being very welcoming. The people in Taiwan that don't want to be Chinese albeit under a KMT type govt are the 'native' Taiwanese who wish to be totally independent.
Certainly the Chinese have no need to get involved with N.Korea as it poses little threat - other than any conflict would effect business - now that might make some difference.
Load Toad is online now  
Old 28th May 2009, 23:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: somewhere special
Age: 46
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kim Jong Il’s provocations to the West may hide a rational purpose - Times Online

See the link above for an alternative view on why Korea is behaving this way.
Herc-u-lease is offline  
Old 29th May 2009, 00:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
John Boltons take....

Nathan Gardels: Is John Bolton Right About North Korea?

What bothers me most is the suggestion of regime change - changed to what? We don't seem to do regime change very well and more instability and someone having to foot the bill - doesn't seem very appealing.
Load Toad is online now  
Old 29th May 2009, 01:40
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: nocte volant
Posts: 1,114
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can the west do anything? I am lead to beleive that the N Korean military has conventional arms poised to strike S Korean population centres at any time, inflicting mass casualties.

This was a big issue in the build up to GW2 and it was argued that something should be done about the N Korean threat then, rather than going into Iraq.

I think the answer lies with Chinese diplomacy. China is, after all, virtually propping up KJI with food and energy aid.
Trojan1981 is offline  
Old 29th May 2009, 01:44
  #18 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,095
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would bet reasonable money that more than one satellite has been re-positioned lately, along with a few rather large submarines and possibly a carrier battle group or two? Just a personal view but I think if the North launched anything hostile towards the South or Japan they would only get one go at it. Possibly one or two anti missile missiles not very far away as well, it is not as though there hasn't been ample time for preparation for just this scenario.. China's economic situation and relationship with the rest of the world means that they probably don't want to get involved in anything too big either, bit of sabre rattling perhaps but nothing too aggressive. As previously said, just a personal view, North Korea could well be cranking up the blackmail handle again, but they are running out of options.
parabellum is offline  
Old 29th May 2009, 03:01
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I also would say Australia and Japan would have something to say about it.
Agree 100%. Our Kev would make a stern, very vewy seriowus(sic) speech, (maybe even in Mandarin!), and ohhhh... I dunno, six months or so later, we might be able to spare a half platoon of steely-eyed accountants from the Pay Corps.

------

Attempting to be serious, I think any move to go eyeball to eyeball with Kim Jong Il and the DPRK has all the potential of a Cuban Missile Crisis Mark 2. History has shown us that that particular crisis went far, far closer than most appreciated at the time to M.A.D. failing to work, and that involved people who in normal times, might have been considered very rational. Some among the Cuban leadership of the time have now admitted that, even knowing it would have involved nuclear war and massive damage, even the total destruction of Cuba, emotions were running so high and events were moving so fast that they would have gone ahead to open, full-on conflict on a number of occasions if the Americans had acted in a way other than they did.

I fear that 'rational' isn't a description that can be honestly used to describe all the players in a DPRK/the rest of the world standoff if one were to occur today.

Some cynics say that the Americans and our own governments have a plan to keep us all in a constant state of fear. I have to admit that in this case, with me, they're succeeding admirably.

In my opinion, only the Chinese are in any real position to resolve this.

If they choose to.
Wiley is offline  
Old 29th May 2009, 05:01
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fact that the North presumably have a number of warheads already notwithstanding, I bet a lot of study has been / is going on again on how to take out that reactor; we could well do without the bastard making any more, hopefully the warheads could be dealt with later.

If not used because he's a bit miffed about his reactor accident - that of course is the difficult bit...
Double Zero is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.