Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Smugglers!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd May 2009, 13:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nah they'd be called Members of Parliment
NURSE is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 15:11
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AKT
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a load of bollocks. I'm a Lyneham mover myself and know the two characters involved fairly well. Granted they took the piss abit with the quantities of contraband they brought back but this is the first i've heard of them using repat flights. Sounds like the Sun making up complete bollocks up as usual.
LynehamMuppet is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 15:29
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 276 Likes on 112 Posts
I'm a Lyneham mover myself and know the two characters involved fairly well. Granted they took the piss abit with the quantities of contraband they brought back but this is the first i've heard of them using repat flights.
And what did you do about the quantities of contraband your colleagues were involved with?

I guess Lyneham crews will now have to look forward to being rummaged whenever they fly into the UK?
BEagle is online now  
Old 22nd May 2009, 15:32
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AKT
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they are not doing anything illegal then they need not worry about a rummage.
LynehamMuppet is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 15:38
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm

Well lets look at this, its been going on for years since Customs decided not to meet aircraft going into Brize or Lyneham!!! (or very few). It does not take much of a brain to figure out you may get away with stuff like this. They should look at what goes on out in afgan or iraq on the hercs flying round there. They say that only 8 may be involved hmmm more like 40 to make something like this work
mams is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 15:38
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Why oh why would I wanna be anywhere else?
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I seem to remember that many years ago a Vulcan was undergoing a deep strip examination and hordes of ciggies were discovered hidden in the wing that the miscreant presumably hadn't been able to recover when the aircraft landed back at base some considerable time previously.

There was some talk that it might just have been aircrew rather than ground crew.

Lesson: Everybody's at it given sufficient reward, temptation and opportunity.
sisemen is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 15:45
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Greedy and stupid

There's a much better mark up on Viagra


What would be interesting would be if they are Duty Free's or 'Counterfeit Afghan Market' (even cheaper). I don't think there's a limit on the latter.
SirPeterHardingsLovechild is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 16:01
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 68
Posts: 2,027
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If true, this sickens me.

This couldn't be more tasteless if the perps had pissed on the graves of our fallen heros, shame on them.

I know a family who lost a loved one doing their duty recently and I cannot imagine what their reaction to this story would be.

Shame on them again!
Evanelpus is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 16:12
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,371
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The bit that amuses me about some of the responses on here are that they are made by the very people who probably "bent the rules" bringing back goodies from outside the EU - it wasn't that long ago that the limit was £100 of other goodies be it Webers, steaks, lawn mowers, car exhausts, sunglasses, jeans, CDs etc etc etc regardless of whether they from a BX or not. And if I remember correctly the operating crew allowance was zero!

This incident has been made to sound worse because it is ciggies as well as a bit (by the sounds of it) of artistic licence by the Sun. Would the Sun have been interested if it had been routine stuff (i.e not ciggies / alcohol) bought back following an exercise in the States. I doubt it.

A couple of chancers pushed their luck, got caught, and if found guilty will get due punishment. Where it will hurt is if HMRC now do a full Red/Green channel on all returning flights.
Wrathmonk is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 16:25
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 488
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There seems to be a few posters on here who seem to condone smuggling, as long as it is in small quantities. I'm not going to jump on the outrage express but just for the record if you bring in any quantity over the HMRC limit, or sell-on your duty-free, then you have broken the law - it's your choice.

It is real temptation for the badly-paid boys and girls who work as cabin crew for airlines to succumb to the special-offer on 400 cigarettes in order to make a few extra quid by selling them on to friends. Where I work now the company will instantly dismiss any employee caught over their limit, regardless of any HMRC involvement. No formal warning, no lesser administrative or disciplinary action - simply instant dismissal. In that climate you know the risk and you make your own choice. Sensible people will not even take a risk on: "Not taking cigs? Will you take these for me?".

If this story is true, then I'm sure that there will be prosecutions as HMRC will regard an organized racket by professionals with access to air-freight as a serious offence. However, it might be worth reflecting that this kind of thing could well have roots in a collective view that 'small amounts are ok, aren't they?'
Brain Potter is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 16:29
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 276 Likes on 112 Posts
Speak for yourself, wrathmonk - I was always scrupulously honest with HMRC and they never, ever shafted me. In fact they would often charge far less than perhaps they should have.

One Christmas I 'self declared' a fair amount of stuff from the USA via the 'blank cheque and honesty box' system at Brize - they never charged me a penny.

mams, if what you say is true (and I hope it isn't), then perhaps the SIB and HMRC will be on the case pretty schnell. As indeed they should.

On the way from Deci back to Wattisham, I once witnessed a VC10 navigator trying to have a conversation with a casualty on a stretcher after we'd bent into Wildenrath for an aeromed case - bloke was plumbed into a drip and surrounded by anxious-looking Paraffins.....

"Are you taking any duty free home, mate?", was the navigator's opening comment...... Chief Paraffin was most assuredly NOT happy!
BEagle is online now  
Old 22nd May 2009, 16:53
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: in my combat underpants
Age: 53
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evanelpus - you have jumped aboard the outrage bus exactly as I expected the average Sun reader would.

The fact they were smuggling is the story - the possible crime. Not that they may have used flights (amongst others) that were being used for repatriation. Tell me you don't think we have the capacity to fly the deceased back on their own airframe - please.
Mr C Hinecap is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 17:03
  #33 (permalink)  
FFP
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hang on......smuggling fags into the UK from Afg ?!?!?!

I can think of other stuff in Afg that would have made far more money....
FFP is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 17:09
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Much more difficult to get from the NAAFI though, FFP
SirPeterHardingsLovechild is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 17:12
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Herts, UK
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"What would be interesting would be if they are Duty Free's or 'Counterfeit Afghan Market' (even cheaper). I don't think there's a limit on the latter."
There is. Theatre orders state that the limit is 200 cigarettes per serviceman, per journey, no matter where or how purchased.
If you wanted to go by what (as a civilian) you're allowed, UK customs wise, then yes there's no limit (other than that it has to be for personal consumption) but you have to provide proof of purchase and proof that they are tax paid. Your chogie cleaner at BAS won't be able to provide you with either. So either way the bottom line is, it's an allowance of 200.
Laarbruch72 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 17:18
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think there's reasonable chance that these were freight!
SirPeterHardingsLovechild is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 17:32
  #37 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,577
Received 435 Likes on 229 Posts
The reason? Some brave little soldier had filled spaces in some pongo machinery with contraband, then bodge taped over them......
These lead smugglers are awful, aren't they?
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 22nd May 2009, 18:04
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: somewhere special
Age: 46
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
while we're at it, shall we try and justify insurance fraud too? to those who think that any kind of "it's over the allowance but that's ok" - it is tax evasion! "i claimed on my insurance, because every does" is a similarly asinine argument.

The Sun has used the typical BNP style journalism to work the public opinion up into a frenzy and it seems to have worked; even on this forum. shall we now condemn all movers and hang them? f**k it, let's go get the gibbet; why let the facts get in the way of a good public beheading? Or shall we wait and see the actual facts and let the disciplinary process work its course; like several others suggest?

People may think i am standing on some kind of moral high ground, but i, like many, own a piece of paper signed by the Queen (i know it's a stamp/copy) that quite clearly says "honesty" in amongst the text.

Rant over......and breathe
Herc-u-lease is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 18:49
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Herts, UK
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think there's reasonable chance that these were freight!
Doesn't matter, cigarettes are forbidden to be moved in freight, mail, or any kind of unaccompanied baggage. It has to be carried by the passenger. A whole different raft of customs regulations apply to taxable items moved as freight, in short you have to be a licenced distributor.

We used to scan all MFO boxes, freight etc at BAS... we'd let nothing through unaccompanied (and many would try mailing 1000 fags home at a time in the post, a big no-no) but we would turn a blind eye to the passengers carrying the odd extra carton or two at check in.
Of course once we'd scanned MFO's etc, we sealed them, and they went into the Movers secure yard for onward shipping. After that, it's down to the movers to keep them secure, and HM Customs to check the seals in the UK.

UK Customs have allowed us some leeway for many years now at major airheads and the seals never got checked, maybe that'll change in light of this.
Laarbruch72 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 18:53
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 276 Likes on 112 Posts
Actually, for once on PPRuNe, this hasn't degenerated into a 'mover bashing' thread.

It is clear that the vast majority of decent Air Movs personnel are as equally appalled as everyone else; perhaps they are best placed to root out the miscreants?

ShyTorque, learn about weight and balance and you'll find that it doesn't take much to exceed CG limits if loaded on the ramp.....
BEagle is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.