Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Bos/Kos gongs no longer allowed to be worn??

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Bos/Kos gongs no longer allowed to be worn??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th May 2009, 14:43
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,302
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Grusome

Oh then you mean CB rather than CDM!

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
Old 14th May 2009, 17:37
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Naval GSM

how cross some of us in dark blue were when the Naval GSM 1915 was superseded by the GSM 1962
Quite agree, UJ, the old NGS was a super medal, with Britannia and a couple of horses charging through the waves. By contrast the 1962 GSM reverse has to be one of the most boring examples of British medal design ever. Some not bad designs these days, I quite like the Op Telic medal, but the less said about the UN/NATO medals the better!
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 14th May 2009, 20:57
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,792
Received 78 Likes on 35 Posts
TELIC Medal

My TELIC medal is a real pain compared to the others - it came out of the box quite tarnished and I've never been able to get it looking truly spanking. Any one else had the same problem? I'm reluctant to take wire wool to the thing ...

Easy
Easy Street is offline  
Old 15th May 2009, 04:42
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Republic of the Philippines ex L1011 GE
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
have you tried a normal pencil eraser?
pigsinspace is offline  
Old 15th May 2009, 04:56
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: in my combat underpants
Age: 53
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Irate contributors. Do you really think the tailors are little powercrazed Napoleons and trying to subvert the Forces? No - they tend to be honest civilian tradesmen and women trying to do their best and keep their customers dressed correctly. They are not messing with your uniforms for s**ts and giggles. They appear to be following a badly-worded document provided for them. How about assisting with understanding rather than the 'oy, stitch, I know best, do it' internet hardmen lines you trot out here? I have worked with good and bad tailors - I've worked with good and bad in every RAF Branch and Trade too. Get over yourselves and see people away from the cockpit as people.
Mr C Hinecap is offline  
Old 15th May 2009, 12:38
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Aye, tailors only work iaw documentation handed to them by Supply, who in turn get the documents from someone who is supposed to know about these things and gets paid a pretty penny for the privilege.

If tailors were to start making up their own dress regulations then they wouldn't get paid for the work, nor for correcting their mistake. This is why you are supposed to have a supply trade SNCO who is familiar with current dress regs at hand in order to sign-off work being return after tailoring as correct, which in-turns authorises payment for said tailoring.

Whether this happens in all (or any) Clothing Stores these days is another matter, I can only go on what happened many years ago when I ran Clothing Stores.

I'll go now though, feeling sleepy after discussing matters that I have tried to purge from my mind......
The Helpful Stacker is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.