Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Armed Forces fully manned ?????????

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Armed Forces fully manned ?????????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th May 2009, 10:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Armed Forces fully manned ?????????

Army set to reach full strength due to recession - Telegraph


I'm not quite sure where they all are but they are not in my Squadon.
spheroid is offline  
Old 9th May 2009, 10:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No way has the Army recruited 4000 odd soldiers, trained them and sent them to units since January, not a hope in hell.

Maybe they mean applications have risen? Without taking into account wastage?
Yeoman_dai is offline  
Old 9th May 2009, 11:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Ignoring the school-boy typos which further dent the credibility of this article, in no way can an increase in people applying to join up be classed as reaching full strength.

Numbers are one thing, experience and effectiveness are very very different. And that will take much more than a recession to sort out.

Of course, non of that will mean anything to the bean-counters, spin doctors and senior officers in recruiting ivory towers.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 9th May 2009, 11:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nail - Head.

Melchett:

Of course, non of that will mean anything to the bean-counters, spin doctors and senior officers in recruiting ivory towers.

They don't actually care about experience, capability etc. They will massage the capability requirement to suit the budget at the time; this will in turn influence our foreign policy and hopefully, in the future, our political masters will not ask us to punch above our weight. This cloud of shortsightedness may just have a silver lining in the form of disentanglement from US foreign policy.

Luck or judgement? You decide but it may just work in our favour.
Grabbers is offline  
Old 9th May 2009, 13:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 59
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not quite sure where they all are but they are not in my Squadon.
Unless there is a bit of time travel they won't be there for another 2 years. The article does sort of make it clear that this is not now but in the future.

The Army is expected to reach full strength in two years' time as the recession is prompting increasing numbers to enrol.

It is expected to reach its full strength figure of 101,790 by 2011 after years of it struggling to attract new recruits
November4 is offline  
Old 9th May 2009, 16:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMP briefing at Brize only a few weeks ago stating that we will continue to be undermanned until 2013. After that magical date, everything will be absolutely rosey in the garden

(huge amount of bullsh!t now = quality roses in 2013!!!)
Lord Elpus is offline  
Old 9th May 2009, 16:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know several people in the Navy, from subs' to helicopter engineers; they all report people thoroughly p'd off and leaving in droves.

Which makes me wonder how they're going to man ( or woman ) the CVF's, even one at a time.

I gather the FAA is not exactly overflowing with pilots either, which is hardly surprising.
Double Zero is offline  
Old 9th May 2009, 16:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Portsmouth
Age: 40
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the Army minimum contract term of 4 years the majority of those that signed on the dotted line last year will more than likely leave in 2012 when they reach that 4 year point, and if the recent serge of applicants can be based on the recent recession then if the country pulls itself out of it by 2013, all those that joined up this year will leave then. A lot of the applicants see it as just a job, which no matter how many times you try and tell them it is a lifestyle they still don't beleive you. We had one that when he realised the sign off period is a year he didn't want to apply.

You will never get a fully manned Armed Forces with the above in mind. Plus take into account those that have reached their end of Service and those that get fed up with the tempo of Ops we will always struggle to maintain the correct manning. But those of us in it for the long haul still trundle on through.
alexlee is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.