Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Secret Oxon heli-base safe, Belvedere scrapped

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Secret Oxon heli-base safe, Belvedere scrapped

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th May 2009, 14:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Secret Oxon heli-base safe, Belvedere scrapped

BBC NEWS | England | RAF 'super base' plan is dropped
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 7th May 2009, 15:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,078
Received 188 Likes on 72 Posts
When does the next study into closing Benson and Odiham start? In my experience, the gap between studies is always kept short enough to prevent any investment in infrastructure.

Any truth in the rumour that MQ and crumbling Barrack Blocks are being constructed at Bastion for permanent occupation by the Chinook Wg? Spouses will be invited to apply for posts in the laundry/EFI or DFAC.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 7th May 2009, 15:29
  #3 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
ISTR a thread on here that closing Odiham is complicated by the land having to revert to the previous owners at no cost, so there is no capital gain in closing it?

I'm not surprised that Benson has been saved. It's of little use to the Army given its location, size etc., and there would complications closing it and keeping the CAE sim buildings (or paying CAE huge sums to move them).

Looking forward to the extra noise when 230 re-locates there, though

Last edited by airborne_artist; 7th May 2009 at 15:53. Reason: spelling
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 7th May 2009, 15:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,078
Received 188 Likes on 72 Posts
ISTR a thread on here that closing Odiham is complicated by the land having to revert to the previous owners as no cost, so there is no capital gain in closing it?

I'm not surprised that Benson has been saved. It's of little use to the Army given its location, size etc., and there would complications closing it and keeping the CAE sim buildings (or paying CAE huge sums to move them).
Neither of these factors, both of which are very relevent, stopped Project Belvedere or Project Jericia from delaying investment.

Last edited by minigundiplomat; 7th May 2009 at 18:50.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 7th May 2009, 16:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sandhurst
Age: 50
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank god they are keeping Benson.

They do a brilliant trackday there.
GPMG is offline  
Old 7th May 2009, 18:48
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 60
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the track day thing does the mopedathon still happen?
ianp is offline  
Old 7th May 2009, 18:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Spot of good news there, although if I recall if it had ever 'closed, one suggestion was that the Army would move in with their Lyx.

However, given the desperate shortage of cash, and the fact that the outcome of Belvedere was always obvious to even the most inexperienced / short sighted / plain stupid, why the powers that be not see that and just how much money that could have gone into providing more kit for the SH force or even upgrading the accommodation at Benson?
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 7th May 2009, 20:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"It is now apparent that efficiencies that could be achieved from a major rationalisation programme would not produce the necessary return on the significant investment that would be required to implement change.

"We have therefore decided that to continue Programme Belvedere does not represent best value for money for the department and the programme is to close with immediate effect."

...or in other words,

"The programme's too expensive, so it'll be closed immediately."

60 words vs 10.
seafuryfan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.