Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Flying Boots...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Apr 2009, 13:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying Boots...

This may seem like a bit of a daft pointless question, but what are the difference between special flying boots, and 'normal' boots, like a pair of Lowa's or issue Combat Boots - High. What advantages do they give over normal boots?

Can you tell that there isn't a lot going on in life at the moment :P
Yeoman_dai is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 13:44
  #2 (permalink)  
622
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hants
Age: 55
Posts: 1,574
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
I believe it's mainly due to tread patterns...I think flying boots have an 'anti Fod picking up' pattern...
622 is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 13:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sandhurst
Age: 50
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do they have a +2 modifier when using a 20 sided dice?
GPMG is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 14:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't speak for the new pattern but my '67 pattern were also lighter than a pair of DMS shoes. Also, unlike the later, but not the latest, combat boots they also had a leather lining. With proper treatment they were also water proof. My 1981 pair are still fine.
Wader2 is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 14:13
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GPMG - yeah I heard that too, but they cost over 600 Gold Pieces, way out of my price range
Yeoman_dai is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 14:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,785
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
As mentioned earlier, the RAF flying boots have less tread, which is meant to drag less crap into the cockpit.
Runaway Gun is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 14:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Runaway Gun
As mentioned earlier, the RAF flying boots have less tread, which is meant to drag less crap into the cockpit.
They still allow crap into the cockpit though.









But we try and weed them out in training

hat, coat, scarf
Wader2 is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 14:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,046
Received 2,919 Likes on 1,249 Posts
Damn, you beat me to it, I was going to say they convey it to the cockpit
NutLoose is online now  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 15:27
  #9 (permalink)  
Fly-Friendly
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around the middle
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying boots have also been through the burn chamber ie can protect the feet from the cartridges on an ejection seat.... I think but stand to be corrected.
R 21 is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 17:49
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
They are all of the above; however, because they are hand-made and are very expensive. It is highly likely that, when resources become available (manpower), the Mk1 Aircrew will be withdrawn from service for all but a few.

As with most of the AEA, the boot has it's origins within the FJ world, but as many are aware they are not very effective for other users. More importantly, the requirements for other users are not so specifc and a selection of boots will be cleared for use by RW and FW aircrew.

Watch this space..............
Could be the last? is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 18:27
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new dotty-style flying boots also come in random sizing structure (304/118); unlike DMS/Field boots which come in standard British sizes such as 8M, etc
monkeytamer is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 19:58
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So say you had a pair of Altbergs or Lowas, they would be fine to wear, basically, there is little to no difference at the end of the day beyond what is acceptable with uniform and comfortable?
Yeoman_dai is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 20:58
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ice Station Kilo
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The random sizing structure is not that random, it merely states the length/width of the sole of the boots in millimetres.
akula is offline  
Old 1st May 2009, 10:52
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,785
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
So say you had a pair of Altbergs or Lowas, they would be fine to wear, basically, there is little to no difference at the end of the day beyond what is acceptable with uniform and comfortable?
Unless somebody with a morbid fascination with standards takes an interest.

"You can't have something better than what everyone else is wearing... Have you got an extra pair for me?"
Runaway Gun is offline  
Old 1st May 2009, 11:12
  #15 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Given that flying boots are designed to minimise FOD in the aircraft how does that sit with the AT/SH world? They regularly pick up loads of people with Dirty Great Boots which could quite easily carry in all sorts of grot? I've heard tell of horror stories about the lifting of floors in C-130's, Wokkas, etc and finding all sorts of alien life forms lurking in the bilges!
 
Old 1st May 2009, 13:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Warboys
Age: 55
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had an ATCA stude on a jolly be so ill we set down in a field to let her out to be sick.
When she got back on and lifted we found that she had trodden in some nasty excrement, walked it in and was now sitting with her feet in front of the blower/heater.

We had to set down again to let the other 2 studes hurl

My '88 boots are still going strong, I remember us testing their flame/heat proofing by standing in a bonfire whilst on CSRO training in Otterburn...the gloves worked quite well as well.
Wessex Boy is offline  
Old 1st May 2009, 20:48
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure about the latest flying boot, but the 65 pattern had a wooden strip in it which prevented hot metal slicing through the sole like it was butter and several layers of leather in the sole too. Also the polish was silicon based? And supposedly fire retardant, that was our excuse for not polishing them as it was always difficult to find some. The polish issue was solved by stopping the supply totally and providing normal Kiwi black, must have been a reason why they didn't use it before?
All the modern boots look and feel great but I am not convinced they would last 5 seconds if you had to stay and fight the fire or travel through it to escape, all very likely for multi types if the worst should happen. I vaguely remember a documentary where Simon Weston (I think) described escaping the fire on Sir Galahad; he fell over as his feet kept slipping due to the soles melting. What temperature do the laces, nylon sides, soles, linings, etc. of non aircrew boots melt at? We should be striving to improve AEA not dumb it down.

Oh no I'm a boot geek now
Ivan Rogov is offline  
Old 1st May 2009, 22:26
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was there not a case where non standard (modded) footwear led to death by hypothermia viz a torn immersion suit bootee ?
glad rag is offline  
Old 2nd May 2009, 00:24
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is it that the RAF flying boot comes in grey but the Army and Navy version comes in black?
wg13_dummy is offline  
Old 2nd May 2009, 01:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ISTR the 'price' on the box mine came in was £186.

Far softer and more comfortable than DMS, the latter because (I think) they come in a greater range of sizes for those with non-standard feet mine are size 272/107.

The laces are about 8-feet long, or at least that's what it feels like!

Yes they have a different tread pattern, but they aren't much good in snow and ice, and I note they are also wearing quite quickly. Mind you, the last DMS I had lasted less than 6 months before the soles rotted like the previous pair.

STH
SirToppamHat is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.