Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-16s damaged in AFG (from f-16.net)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-16s damaged in AFG (from f-16.net)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Mar 2009, 11:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 51st State
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
F-16s damaged in AFG (from f-16.net)

F-16 Mishap News

Belgian F-16s in Afghanistan heavily damaged



March 8, 2009 (by Lieven Dewitte) - Three of the four Belgian F-16s stationed in Kandahar sustained heavy damage after their engines where FOD'ed by debris kicked up by a landing transport aircraft.




So much dust and debris was released that the F-16 engines came to a halt.

The three Belgian aircraft were sitting on their parking spot when a cargo plane taxied along.

That maneuver kicked up large quantities of pebbles and sand, which ended up in the engines of the Belgian F-16s and damaged the rotor blades.

As a precaution, and to any avoid further damage, the engines were removed from the three jets and sent back to Belgium for further inspection. One of the jets already has a new engine and is airworthy again.

A C-130 will leave Belgium on Monday with two replacement engines to repair the other F-16s.

The Belgian Air Component deployed four F-16AMs to Kandahar in September 2008 together with 140 troops. They support the 41,700-strong International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan.
HaveQuick2 is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2009, 12:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Maybe it had landed and was taxing away from the runway.

Pedantic rays set to kill today?
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2009, 15:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It appears intake blanks might have been a cheaper option, or were they running alongside the strip, awaiting such an eventuality?
kokpit is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2009, 16:13
  #4 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hang on chaps! Perchance this was written by someone for whom English is not his native tongue (the hint is in his name?) and was therefore written in a style that maybe a natural English speaker wouldn't? Cut him some slack, he was doing his best with someone else's words. And good luck to the Belgian Air Force (sorry, I don't do 'air component')
 
Old 10th Mar 2009, 05:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lieven Dewitte

leavin' de wit

leaving the wit

GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2009, 11:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Firmly grounded, thankfully
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Belgian VSTOL F-16s??????

Cool. Never knew the F-16 could hover. That must explain the slow speed handling though.

That maneuver kicked up large quantities of pebbles and sand, which ended up in the engines of the Belgian F-16s and damaged the rotor blades.
nunquamparatus is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2009, 12:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to show impartiality nunquamparatus, it might be better that you're Firmly Grounded, I imagine those rotor blades are sitting amongst an equal number (there or thereabouts) of stator blades and not on the head
kokpit is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2009, 12:49
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Firmly grounded, thankfully
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wit?

kokpit.

You are a wit. Well, half of one.

It was spontaneous and its called humour.
nunquamparatus is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2009, 15:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a very good chance that between the AT and the FJ there was some civvy SH.
rolandpull is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2009, 16:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Firmly grounded, thankfully
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nope

RA

No.......spent a good few minutes looking at your post and found nothing to laugh at. Came to the conclusion that you are just not funny.

And no, I don't laugh at my own jokes. At myself, yes, at my jokes, no.
nunquamparatus is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2009, 01:14
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This must be a record - posts go straight from pedantic to slanging match faster than ( even a conventional, and didn't see any mention of VT ) F-16...

The only sensible post, which might have been worth hearing an answer to, was ' why no intake blanks ? ' - it seems inferred they were lined up to taxy out, but...

Wrong place, wrong time, wrong instructions to passing transport ?

Seems we'll never know, anyway posting allied losses is not such a brilliant idea, pointing out the quick replacement of assets certainly is though.
Double Zero is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.