Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Uk Base Closures

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Uk Base Closures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 12:07
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,132
Received 28 Likes on 17 Posts
Biggus - Yes that would be how it worked if only those in the parts of Scotland affected could vote on issues that affected them but that isn't how it works.

Labour voters in other parts of Scotland read newspapers don't they?

Newspaper headlines say "Westminster to shut down Scottish bases", Scottish voters in constituencies outside of those affected vote against the party responsible, with the assistance of a little encouragement by nationalistic political parties de-crying it as "yet another blow against the Scottish by an England-centric parliament" or some such rot.

That is how these things actually work and as such whilst Labour may not have control of seats in the areas in which RAF bases are located they have seats and more importantly, marginal seats, in other parts of Scotland that would be affected.

Of course I'm sure you already knew all this but were mealy looking for a rise weren't you? Please tell me you aren't completely naive.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 12:10
  #42 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
strike capability replacement involving UCAV and cruise missiles
AH ! Its the obvious solution. No need for manned aircraft, we'll do it all with missiles. Now where have I heard that before...

The proper use of UCAV's and cruise missiles is as a force multiplier, not a replacement. Now, how do you get to be an Air Vice Marshal without being able to explain that to a House of Commons Select Committee in simple plain English?
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 12:11
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,871
Received 339 Likes on 119 Posts
I think you'll actually find that, given the choice between living amongst the web-fingered dualling-banjo folk or the DFMB scoffers, 9 out of 10 owners whose cats expressed a preference would probably choose......








Bruggen!
BEagle is online now  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 12:59
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The Crucible
Age: 55
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Newspaper headlines say "Westminster to shut down Scottish bases", Scottish voters in constituencies outside of those affected vote against the party responsible, with the assistance of a little encouragement by nationalistic political parties de-crying it as "yet another blow against the Scottish by an England-centric parliament" or some such rot.
I believe that this procedure is called 'Politics'.

the web-fingered dualling-banjo folk or the DFMB scoffers
Ah BEagle. Another dig. Have you forgotten how to spell your favourite anti-Scottish insult or have you increased your repetoire and are trying for the prize of the most small-minded bigot in the country.
Len Ganley is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 18:16
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,460
Received 82 Likes on 36 Posts
THS

Yes, totally naive...as you say

"...Newspaper headlines say "Westminster to shut down Scottish bases", Scottish voters in constituencies outside of those affected vote against the party responsible, with the assistance of a little encouragement by nationalistic political parties de-crying it as "yet another blow against the Scottish by an England-centric parliament" or some such rot...."

So, take this as a possible scenario. For whatever reason the plan is to close Kinloss. First of all we are talking one base, not Scottish BASES!

You announce it as part of a package which includes closure of facilities in England as well, MAKING THE POINT THAT SCOTLAND ISN'T BEING SINGLED OUT/VICTIMIZED. You play up the fact that Lossiemouth will be beefed up, overall job losses minimized by a considerate government, but belt tightening is required during the credit crunch, etc. You point out that if the SNP get their way all the bases in Scotland will close and it will be defenceless. You SPIN the release information in other words, and time the announcement carefully.

If you announce it a year or two before any major elections it will be forgotten about everywhere but the local area effected within a few days...

The majority of Labour votes in Scotland are now concentrated around Glasgow, in areas where peoples father and mothers, and grandfathers and grandmothers before them, all voted Labour. The core vote, which is the majority of what is left, will be in no way effected. What happens in Scotland north of Perth is of little interest to even the majority of Scots. The maps end there with pictagrams and warnings like "here be monsters"! The Scottish press (at least what I read) is not exactly violently anti Labour either. The Westminster Labour party is probably more anti Scottish Labour than the press is.

All in all, I very much doubt the Labour party consider themselves held hostages to fortune by the RAF bases in Scotland.

But then apparently I'm naive.

Oh - I also said (in my naiveity) earlier, that, if you want to save money in the short term, closing bases is not a good option....
Biggus is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 19:08
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Close by!
Posts: 324
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Biggus,

What you have produced is "spin" and a certain amount of the "good day to bury bad news" type of politics we have seen for the last few years.

On the main topic, if bases are to close, a surefire way is to look see where most money has been spent, they're bound to go.

Still say it would make most sense to locate the Tonkas closer together so you can get you spares and stuff easier, who knows if they're close enough you could do away with an entire swathe of stn management, OC Ops, Fwd, Dpth, BSW et al.

What ever happens I'm not convinced that it will improve our capabilities but would stake my life on it saving money.
insty66 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 19:50
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,460
Received 82 Likes on 36 Posts
"..On the main topic, if bases are to close, a surefire way is to look see where most money has been spent, they're bound to go...."

Leeming it is then....

Ministry of Defence | Defence News | Estate and Environment | Duchess of Cornwall opens new RAF accommodation
Biggus is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 20:07
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 465
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Insty,

Cut a swathe of management - are you mad man??? You know full well the plan is to cut engineering troops whilst boosting the numbers of Engineer Officers - FWD / Depth. I rest my case.

GR4 co-location? Marham and Honington anybody, rocks to Lossie?

Regards mate.
Jobza Guddun is online now  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 21:02
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bury St Edmunds.
Age: 60
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Honington...

No chance for Honington. Slam blocks and a new mess being built on the ASP.
Guzlin Adnams is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 21:58
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Age: 73
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its all about money

I think Biggus has made to most relevant comment. Before I was put out to grass, the project I was involved with investigated, indeed 'twas planned even, to base the new aircraft at a new base. All was going well until someone did the sums and found no agency had the money for the move. The costs might be recovered in 13 years or so through savings, so no-go and back to plan A.

There was an airfield study made was there not (I forget its title), the idea being to have 5 BIG airfields and sell the rest? What happened to that?

Regardless of whether it makes sense, logic or whatever, its all about money.
AQAfive is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.