Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F/Lynx all systems go at AW

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F/Lynx all systems go at AW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Dec 2009, 13:23
  #261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Racedo blows goats
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wildcat

FP

Its a work in progress:

Future Air-to-Surface Guided Weapon (FASGW)

regards

retard
engineer(retard) is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2009, 13:59
  #262 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Waiting to return to the Loire.
Age: 54
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ground Attack Sidewinder

Similar to above (and not necessarily worthy of a thread in isolation) Flight magazine's exclusive about the AIM 9X being tweaked for a less high altitude mission.

EXCLUSIVE: Raytheon adapts AIM-9X for air-to-ground mission
Finnpog is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2009, 15:14
  #263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
However, the new weapon will have significant advantages over the current Sea-Skua, capable of operating at a range almost doubled over the current missile.
Why?

This facility allows the operator to decide whether to simply disable the target or destroy and sink.
That's not really their job is it?
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2009, 17:32
  #264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To permit a longer stand-off against a well armed platform with a modern air defence system.

There may be occasions when disabling fire rather than lethal fire may be more appropriate to command within the operational context or ROE. Why not provide a highly trained operator in the loop capable of making an informed decision.
Charlie Time is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 09:00
  #265 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To permit a longer stand-off against a well armed platform with a modern air defence system
Such as what...? Aster..? Nope... HQ-9...? Nope.

The missile isn't designed to attack a "Well armed platform with a modern air defence system"... It just isn't capable.
There may be occasions when disabling fire rather than lethal fire may be more appropriate to command within the operational context or ROE. Why not provide a highly trained operator in the loop capable of making an informed decision.
That's the job of the command and not the job of the missile operator.
Do not give the missile operator the ability to make such decisions. His job is to fire the missile against the target he has been ordered to engage. Not to determine whether he fancies it or not.
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 09:07
  #266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wildcat is a platform with a 30 year intended lifespan. It isn't a Lynx (especially from the maritime perspective) and some of the old grey Lynx mindset needs to be left behind.
Charlie Time is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 11:36
  #267 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are confusing capability with platform specifics. Wildcat isn't a platform its an aircraft. SCMR is a platform. The aircraft has a capability. Platforms don't have capabilities.
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 12:12
  #268 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VV,
To be pedantic, SCMR was a requirement not a platform. FLynx was the platform that satisfied the requirement and it is now being developed as the Wildcat (in UK service) to produce a capability that will be delivered by the Director Equipment Capability to the Front Line Commander for his use.
Bismark is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 15:17
  #269 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Racedo blows goats
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FLynx

VV

"The missile isn't designed to attack a "Well armed platform with a modern air defence system"... It just isn't capable."

Not strictly true. If you had stopped at:

The missile isn't designed ....

You would be nearer the mark.

regards

retard
engineer(retard) is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2010, 15:18
  #270 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Truly a face only a mother could love. And strangely familiar...







I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2010, 15:47
  #271 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very close to but not the final colour scheme.
Charlie Time is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2010, 18:12
  #272 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Any closer?
StopStart is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 00:06
  #273 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Disney Corp called... they want royalties for use of their trademarked Goofy design!
GreenKnight121 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.