Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UK to award new support deal for RAF TriStars

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK to award new support deal for RAF TriStars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Oct 2008, 20:52
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cracking post drustsonoferp, (**** username tho') just goes to show just how lacking the service engineering has become due to those who CUT, CUT, CUT.

Yes George, I do mean you and your "synergy".
glad rag is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2008, 21:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colditz young offenders centre
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by philrigger
It does not help the maintenance time when the MoD insists that extra work is introduced into the maintenance plan 'while it is in the hangar'.
The cry of, 'they moved the goal posts', is number 1 in the defence contractor book of excuses.

The funny thing is, I've never yet heard of a supplier refusing a a change order. It's worth too much money to them, regardless of what it might do to delivery, quality, reliability etc.
Jetex Jim is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2008, 22:59
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Angel N1
Posts: 372
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still have a fine collection of rivet bucking bars from Marshall of Cambridge - they came free with every Tristar major.
Aeronut is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2008, 00:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Republic of the Philippines ex L1011 GE
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Marshalls have not done Tristar majors for at least 10 -15 years...

They are done at GAMCo which is now ADAT.

But ADAT used to give away free tools and set guess where this spare bit goes competition.
pigsinspace is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2008, 22:50
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somerset
Age: 68
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cracking post drustsonoferp, (**** username tho')
It's a good name; the anagram solver came out with some really good solutions;

dens rustproof
dosser upfront
fond posturers
fusspot droner

to choose but a few

http://www.ssynth.co.uk/~gay/anagram.html

And John Sneller was doing the Marshall's talking head bit on the news as well.
Riskman is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2008, 22:03
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gloucs
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMS

The three C2/C2A variants (transports) are actually ex Pan Am, the other six tanker aircraft are ex BA.

No, all the seats face forwards.

Lots of trips to the deserts various, and a very occasional jaunt to the Rockies.

The tankers have a far more varied life.
RAFBadger is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 06:50
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GONE BY 2012
Age: 51
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lots of trips to the deserts various, and a very occasional jaunt to the Rockies.
When they are serviceable they sometimes even leave on time!
Truckkie is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 09:39
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 54
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah but if that ever does haoppen, we usually try to work a delay into the schedule at one of the next stops.
glum is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 11:52
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Stowmarket
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF Tristar Contract

How the hell can MoD justify spending £97M on an aircraft which has an OSD of 2013?!
DennisW is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 16:15
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OSD is currently 2015 - which is at least 6 years more service for those 9 airframes. The contract equates to £1.8m per aircraft/year, which compares quite favourably to the maintenance costs of similar types.

Dennis - What's the alternative then?
Brain Potter is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 16:39
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Stowmarket
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF Tristar Contract

With significant spare capacity in the charter market - outsource more service traffic. Tankers , well there's a story! What about a European Tanker fleet based on Airbus...
DennisW is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 17:57
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lowlevel UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DennisW & BrainPotter. According to the Mod there is no problem. Page 110 of the MoD Annual Report and Accounts Volume I 2007-08 (For the year ended 31 March 2008) states clearly that:

We have procured two further C17 Globemaster aircraft in addition to the four envisaged in 2004 and we signed the £13Bn PFI contract for a fleet of new Air Transport and Refuelling Airbus A330-200s to replace the RAF’s TriStar and VC-10 aircraft in March 2008.
So they were all paid off after Easter. Job done!
Data-Lynx is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 23:36
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dennis,

The AirTanker programme will not be ready to take over from the TriStar until 2014-ish - assuming no more delays. The programme is now at the stage where no long term replacement could be up-and-running in any shorter time-scale. You can, with hindsight, argue about the decisions that have created this situation until you are blue in the face, but it won't change a thing. A fleet of instant replacement tankers to buy off-the-shelf does not exist.

On the AT side, it is an often-used but little understood argument to pronounce more charter as the panacea. The MoD is already makes extensive use of charter, but the TriStar fleet has specialist capabilities that the civilian aircraft cannot offer.

£97m is not a large contract and, assuming that Marshall's deliver the goods, seems to be reasonable value.
Brain Potter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.