Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF gnd ops and EU Ops 1

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF gnd ops and EU Ops 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Oct 2008, 13:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: planet earth
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF gnd ops and EU Ops 1

Hi all,

I have been asked a question about the above. With Air Tanker soon to start ops at BZZ, what problems would there be with combining the provisions regarding Flt / Gnd / Trg ops within a civil document (EU Ops 1) to fit the military application (with current RAF regs) and therefore achieve the associated approvals ? Or is this a case of chicken and egg, or (err) egg and chicken

Any views or opinions would be appreciated or direction to a relevant document.

Thanks in advance,

C130Jbloke
c130jbloke is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2008, 14:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: gloucester
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A big plus point engineering wise is that at work has to be signed off by an experience tradesman. Experienced meaning at least 1 years(probably more to gain a licence in civil companys) hands on workThis mean's that SEngO's and JEngO's will have no engineering authority!!! YEEEHARR! No more longwinded explanations to vacant looking JEngO's and Bollox SEngO dictats.....
collbar is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2008, 15:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Away from home Rat
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The aircraft would have to be Certified Release to Service by a B1 or B2 licensed LMCT with type rating and AirTanker (as the AOC and PART 145 maintenance org) company approval. AirTanker will have their MEL and CDL for the "limitations" and "ADF's" (that will not be called them anyway). RAF enginnering as to the JAP100 just will not exist with these aircraft.

The RAF will fly them (possibly to EASA Ops), but it will not fix them to the way the present AT fleet is maintained!
Alber Ratman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.