Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

C-130J

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 21:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C-130J

Is the USA military still using the C-130J?

If not, why? I have heard that it is not battle worthy.
TheMessenger is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 21:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shabby Woods, UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes. Google it.....
BigDH is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 22:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
grey_not_green is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2008, 00:04
  #4 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
DoD Report from a couple of years ago, the full report is linked out of the summary below, look at the letter at the back where the USAF basically tell the report committee they are talking rubbish.

Contracting for and Performance of the C-130J Aircraft - Report No. D-2004-102(PDF) - Project No. D2003AB-0084.000

Contracting for and Performance of the C-130J Aircraft

We substantiated the allegation that the C-130J aircraft does not meet contract specifications and therefore cannot perform its operational mission. The Air Force conditionally accepted 50 C-130J aircraft at a cost of $2.6 billion even though none of the aircraft met commercial contract specifications or operational requirements. The Air Force also paid Lockheed Martin more than 99 percent of the C-130J aircraft's contracted price for the delivered aircraft. As a result, the Government fielded C-130J aircraft that cannot perform their intended mission, which forces the users to incur additional operations and maintenance costs to operate and maintain older C-130 mission-capable aircraft because the C-130J aircraft can be used only for training. The Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition should stop the System Program Office from contracting for additional block upgrades until a contract-compliant aircraft is designed, developed, and delivered; use Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 15 for future modifications that add to the scope of the statement of work to the C-130J multiyear contract (F33657-03-C-2014); increase contract withhold amounts for acceptance of noncompliant aircraft; and develop a schedule for completing outstanding retrofits to accepted and fielded aircraft. (See the Finding section of the report for the detailed recommendations.)
Two's in is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2008, 18:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice 4 year-old report. Any word on how reality is this year?
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2008, 02:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C-130J

'The messenger '

Tell you what, if they're not in use right now, I'll give you £10.00 each for as many as you can find, and I'll take my chances on hiring them out.

DZ
Double Zero is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.