Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Not news for most I fear....

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Not news for most I fear....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Sep 2008, 20:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bury St Edmunds.
Age: 60
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not news for most I fear....

Leasing RAF planes wastes nearly £500m - Times Online

Oh dear.........
Guzlin Adnams is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2008, 22:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mostly here, but often there
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
£500M...pah!

A drop in the ocean compared to the cost of FSTA methinks.
brit bus driver is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2008, 23:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funnily enough

..at a weekend social event near Dundee, there were many comments about our PM, most starting with, "I hate to say this as he is Scottish..."

Gordo has been spotted as the fall guy for Nu Labia by his own kirth and kirn, but the most surprising thing was the fact that most distrusted the Nats almost as much!!

And openly said that he had squandered what had been left for him by the [bastardo] tories.
This is dynamite material no mistake. Scottish Conservatives need to wake up fast!!!
glad rag is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2008, 13:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 54
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the treasury hadn't been so bloody tight in the first place and had released enough cash to buy the jets from the start we wouldn't have wasted so much of the tax payers money over the following years.
glum is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2008, 13:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this the same Gordon Brown?

From The Sunday Times. April 15, 2007

Brown lost £2bn selling UK's gold.

GORDON BROWN is to face questions in parliament after revelations that he disregarded advice from the Bank of England before he sold off more than half the country’s gold reserves at the bottom of the market.
PS.
If the treasury hadn't been so bloody tight in the first place and had released enough cash
At the time Brown was the Treasury.
forget is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2008, 13:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder what we have paid out in chartering all the An124's, OMNI and A300f/DC8's over the years. Do we really need to fly phalanx guns systems to the states for overhaul or would a boat trip be cheaper?
rolandpull is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2008, 14:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no doubt that the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Harding of Petherton, has revealed, in a more effective form than I could have done, the great military weakness in terms of aircraft on the transport side …………..
April 1960. Long read, but do a Word Search on key words.
forget is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2008, 14:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: E MIDLANDS
Posts: 291
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Should have bought a dozen C5 Galaxy's when we had the chance in the 1980's. I seem to remember that the US wanted an order to justify keeping the production line open pending thier own order in the next FY budget. I think R-R were keen to get them fitted with RB211s (not that the design changes for a different engine would have reduced the purchase cost!!!)
andyy is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2008, 15:42
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the first comment written by a No 10 spin doctor?

The hours were exceeded because of the operations that Gordon and his buddy Tony imposed on them......
XV277 is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 10:29
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It may have been more expensive in the long run but would it have gotten into service so quickly had we bought them outright.

How long would QinetiQ have sat and played with them before releasing them to the squadron. How much extra Charter would have been needed. How many extra C130 hours would have been flown in the meantime.

366 days from signing the contract to first flight. Granted not an op flight, but they followed soon afterwards.

How much would Ex SS II have cost without them. How would Afghan have been supported without them. How many extra C130 hours would have been flown in the meantime and at what cost in both lives at risk and money.

Maybe I am biased, but I still reckon it was the best solution at the time, despite the eventual cost. Now they have proved their worth, I say buy more of them!!

Andyy, we didn't buy C5s because they are too big for our needs, not even slightly tactical and generally ruddy useless. That and the fact we didn't have anywhere to put them!!!
moosemaster is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 11:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: FL410
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this for real? Do we really fly Phalanx to the US for overhaul?
I see spend to save is alive and well as ever!
D O Guerrero is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 16:50
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mostly here, but often there
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder what we have paid out in chartering all the An124's, OMNI and A300f/DC8's over the years
Last I heard, the figure for charter was running at about £72M a year. An FOI request to DSCOM should get you the answer.
brit bus driver is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2008, 13:53
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somewhere near Slough
Age: 60
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down £500m Squandered!!

A mere £500m. A drop in the ocean to what our mate Gordon has signes us up to £15.7 Billion for FSTA. Even the Australians having looked at PFI an saw that it was hugely more expensive and bought their A330's (now 2 years late and not yet in Service!)......The reason we continued with it is because it was Mr Bruns own idea AND it saved him breaking his 'Golden Rules' when he was in the Treasury - Since 'renting' is not a purchase it does not appear on the governments speadsheets -I think its called Creative Accounting and this form of it would have you put in prison or fined if you tried it in business!
In charge of our country -i wouldn't trust any of them to sit the right way on a toilet seat

However did I hear tell we have bought some more 'new' Tri*'s?? If so what another great management decision -lets buy something so old that the parts are going to become difficult to find and more expensive plus that with such a heavy footprint they can't go many places. Outstanding -cheap now but will cost a fortune in the future to operate-if the movers don't drive steps into them all and ground the fleet!!!!
livenav is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2008, 17:44
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Up North (for now)
Age: 62
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would getting some more Tri-*'s be such a bad decision. If any orgainization in the world has the experience and know-how to keep old pieces of crap flying well beyond their sell-by-dates it's us.
zedder is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2008, 13:24
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Age: 61
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBMFs dak is starting to look more and more viable by the day!!!!
mr fish is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2008, 16:17
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,823
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
My spies tell me that the Australians were somewhat forthright in their (quite justified) view of the whole PFI nonsense......
BEagle is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2008, 16:37
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Isn't the PFI for FSTA really just a big boy version of pikeys buying flash cars on finance?

You get a shiny new toy to play with but by the time you've finished paying it off it'll be knackered and you'll have actually ended up paying twice what the thing was worth new. Oh and if you miss a payment some bloke called Frank will start taking an unhealthy interest in your kneecaps
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2008, 18:06
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,926
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
The Helpful Stacker,


No
pr00ne is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2008, 18:47
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know, it sounded pretty apt in laymans terms.

PFI = We, the taxpayer rent these things at a rate that over their lifetime costs much moere than what it would actually cost to buy, provision and maitain for the same period of time.

We, the taxpayer has to cover all the risks (like it flying in a war zone and being shot at) and if anything goes wrong we get the bill. If it goes right and a profit is made then it goes into the coffers of the private company and the minister who signed the pfi. Only now he works for said company.

The way these rolling goat f*cks look cost effective is that between the time muggins at the bottom has worked out the actual cost with honest basic liney friendly maths and the contract being signed it has gone through so many re drafts and creative accountings black looks white, Satan is our saviour, there is an endless money tree in Gordys back garden and the firms are doing it for their "civic duty" or whatever bollox they spout.

How much of the Iraq restructuring funds have been mislaid?
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2008, 00:05
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, it's simpler than that. PFI contracts don't count as capital spend, so Govt spending stays below the self imposed 'Golden Rule'
XV277 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.