Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

US puts 3 KC-135Rs forward to the UK for SIGINT

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

US puts 3 KC-135Rs forward to the UK for SIGINT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jul 2008, 23:46
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brickhistory
The E-8C is a phenomenal bit of wizardry right up until they put it on used 707s with JT8Ds. Gas guzzling, underpowered, endlessly leaking pieces of sh1t. But other than that......
Was the original plan to to fit it on new build aircraft, until Boeing closed the 707 line (after building ZH107)? Or was the cancellation of new build the reason the line closed?
XV277 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2008, 01:23
  #22 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
My understanding was the decision to put the system on used 707s was the cost was supposed to be significantly less than buying new. Thus the USAF would get the system it wanted in something like the numbers it wanted.

In the end, buying 'well used' didn't save either money or get the numbers it really wanted. Think of it as the proud prototype model for the F-22 procurement. (Remember the one guy who argued endlessly about buying 'used' DC-10s instead of whatever new tanker does get eventually built? All I could think of was this example during that torment.)

At the timel, the US Congress wanted to kill it due to costs. "Why do we need it with the Cold War over?"

I do not know the relationship or timeline regarding the 707 manufacturing line and the E-8C, sorry.

There is a program underway (open source) to re-engine the E-8C. I don't believe it will be with CFMs, but I've been away for too long to be in the know anymore (if ever). The program was wanted much earlier, but other priorities kept taking the money. Sound familiar?


Apologies for the thread creep. Would it be the slightest bit cheaper to have only a few -R models refitted than to finish the original contract?

Last edited by brickhistory; 30th Jul 2008 at 02:22.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.