RN Pilot vs. RAF Pilot age
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RN Pilot vs. RAF Pilot age
Hi all
I would love to know the answer to my following question:
'Why is the age limit for pilot entry 26 in the Royal Navy, and just 23 in the RAF?'
I guess that the RAF operate a wider range of fast jet aircraft than the RN. But why would this alter the entry age?
Many thanks for your thoughts.
Ad
I would love to know the answer to my following question:
'Why is the age limit for pilot entry 26 in the Royal Navy, and just 23 in the RAF?'
I guess that the RAF operate a wider range of fast jet aircraft than the RN. But why would this alter the entry age?
Many thanks for your thoughts.
Ad
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Adam - the answer is, no-one knows! That said, it gets harder to pass the FATs and get through flying training if you are starting aged 25, as aptitude starts to fall off from aged 23 onwards, roughly.
That said, the guy from the course after me who got the only Harrier slot from his EFT was 25 and a qualified barrister when he joined the Dark Blue. Charlie Gilbert - now a large cheese in BAe.
That said, the guy from the course after me who got the only Harrier slot from his EFT was 25 and a qualified barrister when he joined the Dark Blue. Charlie Gilbert - now a large cheese in BAe.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cambridge/Chippenham
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Different Age Limits
It's a combination of aptitude and population size. Say the peak aptitude for Aircrew occurs at about the age of 22/23. There will be some people who have the aptitude at 18 and some still who have it aged 28, but in both cases, many fewer than at 22/23. The RAF has very many more applicants that the RN, even though it also has more places available. It is also more likely to be the first choice for many candidates. So the RAF can fill their slots by only looking at the age range between 18 and 23. However, as the RAF snaffles most of the candidates in this age group, the RN has to cast it's net a little wider and look at candidates up to the age of 26. The RAF could put its age limit up, but that would be inefficient, because, for example, the pass rate at 26 might be one in 200 compared to one in 20 at the age of 22.
Adam,
I will admit I don't know much about the British forces, but they always seem to be cutting back rather than expanding, so I guess they can afford to restrict the pool of applicants.
In Australia, the age limit for RAAF entry is 45 (they prefer <27.5 but I know of at least one 34 yo pilot cadet). In the RAN the age limit is 49 and in the Army Avaition Corps it is 52!
Food for thought.
I will admit I don't know much about the British forces, but they always seem to be cutting back rather than expanding, so I guess they can afford to restrict the pool of applicants.
In Australia, the age limit for RAAF entry is 45 (they prefer <27.5 but I know of at least one 34 yo pilot cadet). In the RAN the age limit is 49 and in the Army Avaition Corps it is 52!
Food for thought.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3Port's answer is probably the size of it but might it change in the future?
The pilot recruitment target increased last year by about 30%. The overall recruitment target this year and on has increased to over 4500. The number of uniformed personnel remains capped at 41000.
Draw your own conclusions.
The pilot recruitment target increased last year by about 30%. The overall recruitment target this year and on has increased to over 4500. The number of uniformed personnel remains capped at 41000.
Draw your own conclusions.
Just a numbered other
I never did ask 'why'.
I just thank the lord that it was so 30 years ago, and that by the time I decided on a flying career, I was too old to become a crab.
Fly Navy
Eat Crab
I just thank the lord that it was so 30 years ago, and that by the time I decided on a flying career, I was too old to become a crab.
Fly Navy
Eat Crab
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: At home.
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Age..
AdamLT
I was told that the RN looks for candidates that are more mature because they *can* operate in a more challenging environment.
Imagine it is night, bad weather, you are low on fuel and there's an enemy sub in the area so no radio / radar / lights and the ship is damaged and has changed course. And, once onboard you have to carry on fighting the ship, you have no where else to go so very much Officer first, pilot second.
I believe the pass mark in the Flying Aptitude Tests for RN is higher than RAF (RAF 80 percentile, RN 90 percentile) so you need to do better in the FATs.
The RAF has fast jets (the RN doesn’t anymore) and these require you to do better for certain aptitudes but you won't get streamed until after Elementary Flying Training anyway.
I am not trying to start a flame war, just relating what I was told...albeit by the RN
I was told that the RN looks for candidates that are more mature because they *can* operate in a more challenging environment.
Imagine it is night, bad weather, you are low on fuel and there's an enemy sub in the area so no radio / radar / lights and the ship is damaged and has changed course. And, once onboard you have to carry on fighting the ship, you have no where else to go so very much Officer first, pilot second.
I believe the pass mark in the Flying Aptitude Tests for RN is higher than RAF (RAF 80 percentile, RN 90 percentile) so you need to do better in the FATs.
The RAF has fast jets (the RN doesn’t anymore) and these require you to do better for certain aptitudes but you won't get streamed until after Elementary Flying Training anyway.
I am not trying to start a flame war, just relating what I was told...albeit by the RN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And, once onboard you have to carry on fighting the ship, you have no where else to go so very much Officer first, pilot second.
Fighter first, target second.
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Str12 - there's very little on your post that's true, as it happens.
Mostly wrong, except that the Navy is only taking applicants who score above 130 for pilot, though the pass is 112. 112 gets you to AIB, but it does not get you to BRNC.
Guess all those RN guys at Naval Strike Wing at Cottesmore were in fact RAF guys wearing RN uniform the day I was there last month, just to fool me.
You'll go to your pit and get some sleep ready for the next launch
I believe the pass mark in the Flying Aptitude Tests for RN is higher than RAF (RAF 80 percentile, RN 90 percentile) so you need to do better in the FATs.
The RAF has fast jets (the RN doesn’t anymore)
you are low on fuel and there's an enemy sub in the area so no radio / radar / lights and the ship is damaged and has changed course. And, once onboard you have to carry on fighting the ship
I am not sure of the reason but my guss is that the RNs upper age allows General Service Seaman/ Warfare Officers to enter the RN and do at least one watchkeeping job at sea in a Frigate or Destroyer before sub specialising as aircrew.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The limit applies regardless of whether you are in-service or a civilian. It follows that in-service personnel could have had 2 or even 3 commissions before switching the aircrew.
In that sense it is identical with the situation in the RAF.
The Pilot age limit for the RAF is for civilian entry, you must be 24 years and 0 months on your first day of IOT. . . If however, you apply to be a pilot from the ranks the age limit is 26
As for why the RAF extends the limit to 26 for in-service applicants can be put down as you are now a known quantity and a lower training risk.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If they passed what types were they assigned to? It takes time to acquire combat knowledge and skills. Were any assigned to fast-jets?
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Career Progression
Andyy touched on career progression at the bottom end and certainly an early commision as a watchkeeper would be useful at the other end I would guess.
In the RAF a career progression might be:
IOT 24, FTS 25, Sqn 27 as a flt lt graduate. 29 2nd tour as senior flt lt. 32 sqn ldr and 37 wg cdr. Add in a couple of years for staff colleges. 43 gp capt and 47 air cdre. 51 AVM and you would then be too old to become an AM even.
Move the entry date and the upper ranks fall off the tree. Starting as an aircrew wg cdr at 40 is as late as the fast mover can afford and then would probably cap at gp capt or air cdre.
CAS joined at 21 and became an AVM at 48 and ACM at 53 so my hack is about right.
You may only wish to rise to sqn ldr but just maybe the system is keener to give all the chance of rising to the top.
In the RAF a career progression might be:
IOT 24, FTS 25, Sqn 27 as a flt lt graduate. 29 2nd tour as senior flt lt. 32 sqn ldr and 37 wg cdr. Add in a couple of years for staff colleges. 43 gp capt and 47 air cdre. 51 AVM and you would then be too old to become an AM even.
Move the entry date and the upper ranks fall off the tree. Starting as an aircrew wg cdr at 40 is as late as the fast mover can afford and then would probably cap at gp capt or air cdre.
CAS joined at 21 and became an AVM at 48 and ACM at 53 so my hack is about right.
You may only wish to rise to sqn ldr but just maybe the system is keener to give all the chance of rising to the top.
