Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Do you call that a UOR? This is a UOR...

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Do you call that a UOR? This is a UOR...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jul 2008, 13:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Do you call that a UOR? This is a UOR...

The next time you wonder whether CAS is spending taxpayer's money wisely, you might want to read this. Apparently some very, very Senior USAF bods thought that having a C-17 strapped to their butts for 12 hours was way beneath them, so they came up with this stunning plan.

See, it starts with allowing duty claims for Gay rights parades and next thing you know we're all about coordinating colours and curtains.

The Air Force's top leadership sought for three years to spend counterterrorism funds on "comfort capsules" to be installed on military planes that ferry senior officers and civilian leaders around the world, with at least four top generals involved in design details such as the color of the capsules' carpet and leather chairs, according to internal e-mails and budget documents.

One request was that the color of the leather for the seats and seat belts in the mobile pallets be changed from brown to Air Force blue and that seat pockets be added; another was that the color of the table's wood be darkened. Changing the seat color and pockets alone was estimated in a March 12 internal document to cost at least $68,240.

washingtonpost.com
Two's in is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 17:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its a pallet that goes on the A/C. I think its more than just leather seats though.

Last edited by VinRouge; 20th Jul 2008 at 20:55.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 17:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 275 Likes on 111 Posts
Well, that's interesting.... Whilst it's a bit daft to expect the C-17A to have passenger seating appropriate for anything more than paratroop insertion, the same should not be assumed of forthcoming AT/AAR aircraft.

The Airbus KC-45A has normal airline seats, loos, galleys and windows. Whereas the woefully inferior Boeing KC-767A has pretty basic 'Rendition Class' seating. Austere seats, minimal 'comfort' facilities - and it doesn't even have cabin windows.

I wonder whether these 'very, very senior USAF bods' are aware of quite how cr@p the KC-767A would be in the passenger role?
BEagle is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 20:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bling Bling!
pogo.org POGO Letter to DoD Secretary Robert Gates regarding wasteful spending on extravagant “Senior Leader In-Transit Comfort Capsules” 07/17/2008 Project On Government Oversight




Could do with one of these on the J!!!

Some of the "specs"

  • “The wall mounted flat screen/flat panel monitor must have a diagonal measurement of at least 37 inches”;
  • “A full length mirror”;
  • “Aesthetically pleasing wall-to-wall carpeting”;
  • “Aesthetically pleasing wall treatments/coverings”;
  • “Aesthetically pleasing ceiling treatments/coverings”;
  • “Internal illumination level will automatically adjust to ambient lighting levels”;
  • “A single remote control unit which controls operation and all functions of the video playback devices as well as the wall mounted flat screen/flat panel monitor”; [Appendix E]
To be fair, the quoted price is fairly reasonable for what they are getting.

Last edited by VinRouge; 20th Jul 2008 at 20:57.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 21:07
  #5 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Didn't Lyneham put some sort of Portakabin type arrangement in the back of C-130 to take Maggie to the Falkands before MPA was finished just after the war? Or did they just put a double curtain around the bog?
Two's in is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 22:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Emptying the litter bin
Age: 65
Posts: 409
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Or did they just put a double curtain around the bog?
Thought Maggie peed standing up
PICKS135 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2008, 10:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: N London
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Badly worded 'spec' they deserve everything that they get !!
PTR 175 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.