Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Demise of the Jetstream

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Demise of the Jetstream

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jul 2008, 08:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 51st State
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Demise of the Jetstream

At long last, looks like the replacement has been officially announced:-

DATE:18/07/08
SOURCE:Flight International
FARNBOROUGH 2008: By Craig Hoyle



Cobham's FR Aviation subsidiary is to supply a new fleet of Beechcraft King Air 350ERs to deliver observer training services for the UK Royal Navy, after being named as preferred bidder for the requirement.
A deal for an undisclosed number of aircraft should be signed in October, according to the Lockheed Martin UK/VT Ascent consortium, which during May received a contract to deliver the UK Ministry of Defence's 25-year Military Flying Training System.


The new type will replace the RN's current fleet of around 12 Jetstream T2 trainers at RNAS Culdrose in Cornwall. The King Airs should be ready for training use one year after contract signature, with operations of the current type to halt during 2010.
FR Aviation was selected during June following a competitive and assessment process of around 18 months, defeating one other bidder to the public-private partnership deal. The company will provide modified aircraft and deliver maintenance support, says David Harrison, divisional commercial director for Cobham Aviation Services.
The selection of the King Air 350ERs - which Harrison says have already been secured - was made by the MoD, but he adds: "It's absolutely the right choice for this task." While declining to detail the required modifications to the aircraft, he says these will be "quite extensive, but well within our capability".
Cobham's success in securing the RN requirement could lead to further opportunities within the MFTS programme, such as for a second-stage rear crew and multi-engine trainer to enter Royal Air Force use in January 2014.
A contract for this work will be awarded during 2011, according to Ascent.
"We will use this opportunity as a real litmus test for Ascent and the MoD to see what we are capable of," says Harrison, who adds: "We will do a good job." Possible export opportunities for similar services could exist in Australia and the Middle East, he says.
HaveQuick2 is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2008, 16:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about Heron flight? Will they be equipped with the King Air as well?
spheroid is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2008, 19:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Demise of the jetstream

Spheroid
You are well out of date! Surely you have heard that CAS didn't like being seen getting out of an RN Jetstream at an RAF base so he told his underlings to get shot of the T3s, despite the fact that the Crabs are in desparate need of AT and the T3s are so cheap to run compared to the 146 or the 125. And they can move 16 people all over Europe!
Look at the savings - £5 mil over 10 years to run Heron Flight versus a annual £3million uplift in MODs travel budget by getting rid of the T3s. Now that is the kind of cost saving I like!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Never let it be said that this wasn't a tribal decision.

Keep you friends close, keep you enemies closer, keep the crabs even closer!

WDD
wetdreamdriver is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 05:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,808
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
How on earth can the RAF be responsible for the demise of Heron Flight?

A great pity if it does go - I remember those DH Sea Herons chugging around the UK when the FAA had a decent number of bases. Then they went and along came the T3s.

This sounds like another crass decision....
BEagle is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 10:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps it's more to do with the fact that the Jetstream is very old and might soon be unsupportable.

I understand that the tri-service UKMFTS project only exists to replace aircraft used for training, so unless the RN finds funding to replace the Heron Flight, I suppose its demise is inevitable.
LFFC is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 11:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Demise of the Jetstream

The reason that the RAF can get rid of the T3 is that they control the support through the training aircraft IPT. And no the T3 isn't very old. its OSD was supposed to be 2018!
wetdreamdriver is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 12:04
  #7 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wonder who is going to buy the old 'Streams and then hire them back to MOD as taxi's, for bazillions of taxpayers dosh? Bet they turn up in Iraqistan painted grey!
 
Old 20th Jul 2008, 14:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LFFC
I understand that the tri-service UKMFTS project only exists to replace aircraft used for training, so unless the RN finds funding to replace the Heron Flight, I suppose its demise is inevitable.
Maybe the FAA will use the same sleight of hand that got them the T3s in the first place? The 'T' was supposed to be for training after all?

"No money for new communications aircraft to replace the Herons"

"Er, we have a need for more observer training capacity"

"OK, here's some money for Jetstream 31s, call them T3s"

"Thanks, er maybe we don't need so many observer trainers after all"

Or am I being cynical?
XV277 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 15:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely you have heard that CAS didn't like being seen getting out of an RN Jetstream at an RAF base so he told his underlings to get shot of the T3s, despite the fact that the Crabs are in desparate need of AT and the T3s are so cheap to run compared to the 146 or the 125. And they can move 16 people all over Europe!
Look at the savings - £5 mil over 10 years to run Heron Flight versus a annual £3million uplift in MODs travel budget by getting rid of the T3s. Now that is the kind of cost saving I like!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Surely that can't be true. CAS wouldn't dare waste that much tax payers money just because his pride was hurt.

Where is that Journo when you need him. Surely we should start a petition to save Heron flight from the RAF.
spheroid is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 16:43
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Boo hiss, nasty old RAF eh?

Poor little Royal Navy, give it a hug.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 22:27
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
they control the support through the training aircraft IPT
That wouldn't be the tri-service training aircraft IPT would it?

Never let the truth get in the way of a good rumour
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2008, 23:32
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,933
Received 2,851 Likes on 1,219 Posts
PPssssssstttttt Wanna buy one? yours for £45 Grand

EVERETT AERO - Aircraft/BAe JETSTREAM

Or do it yourself for £12 grand plus change

EVERETT AERO - Aircraft/BAe JETSTREAM

Do you a nice Dominie for forty big ones

EVERETT AERO - Aircraft/BAe Hawker 125 Dominie

or perhaps you're in the market for something a bit for sporty? a nice Sea Harrier perhaps or failing that at the lower end of the sports dept, how about the Mighty Jaguar ?

EVERETT AERO - Aircraft/BAe SEA HARRIER/FA2/JUMP JET

EVERETT AERO - SEPECAT JAGUAR

All one careful owner and low miles
NutLoose is online now  
Old 21st Jul 2008, 20:11
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A lot closer to the sea
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately MOD 'Centre' don't like VIPTAX. Senior RN Officers can catch the train despite studies saying opposite (and senior RAF doing the opposite)! Never mind all the other things that Heron Flt do. He who holds the purse strings controls the fate of Heron Flight.
I know a lot of lobbying went on to keep the Jetstreams but the Option was taken despite the most senior FAA people kicking up a hell of a fuss. Mind you, which colour blue heads up the show(for another two years)?
Wrists being slapped all round for not knocking it on the head sooner.

Everyone will miss it when it goes and another facet of Naval Aviation gets removed by those people who know the cost of everything and the value of nothing.
WhiteOvies is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2008, 20:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bury St Edmunds.
Age: 60
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PC 12'S anyone?
Guzlin Adnams is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 13:39
  #15 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 82
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Leaving your MOD laptop on a Jetstream must be better than leaving on a train.
green granite is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 14:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am genuinely astounded at the power the RAF has. Reading the above posts, you would think that it controls MOD(Centre), the DsEC, and the IPTs!!!! no wonder the RN are being shafted, as they only run a small operation out of Whale Island.

The fact is that the Jetstream (like the SHAR) is an old aircraft and is going out of service. I don't know the background to the decision to cut Heron Flt, and it looks to me as though it wasn't terribly well thought out, but when, oh when will the RN stop blaming everything bad that happens to the FAA on the RAF??????

PS - WhiteOvies: I see far more Army officers getting out of military aircraft for meetings than RAF....
Occasional Aviator is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 14:17
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pathfinder Country
Posts: 505
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Rent some ex civvy' J31s' or even J41s' from BAe Leasing, they must have more than enough sitting on the ground awaiting work.
aw ditor is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 14:56
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
OA

WhiteOvies obviously hasn't worked in The Centre.

I am genuinely astounded at the power the RAF has. Reading the above posts, you would think that it controls MOD(Centre), the DsEC, and the IPTs
ISTR that the DEC who controlled the Jetstream T2 and T3 is/was a Royal Ai.......... Marine officer. In fact I think the last 2 DsEC DSR have been RM!!!
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 15:20
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Royal Marine officer you say?
Aren't the RM the WAFU version of the RAF Regiment? Aren't they in effect being shafted by one of their own?
Would the RAF ever allow a rock be in a position to make decisions over aircraft operations?
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 15:46
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
I knew that'd get a rise. These fish heads are far too easy to catch.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.