Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Low Flying in UK

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Low Flying in UK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jul 2008, 21:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ruislip Middlesex,England
Age: 69
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low Flying in UK

If possible can anyone shed some light on the rules and regulations for flying military jets at low level in UK airspace!
The reason i am asking,is that on tuesday my wife and i were having a relaxed and pleasant trip through the Dorset countryside,(about 10 miles north of Dorchester),when the front windscreen was "filled" with an F15 from Lakenheath!!......The a/c could not have been flying at more than a 1000ft and seemed to be exiting a nearby valley after which it sped off at low level in a westerley direction!
As there are specific Low Fly areas within the UK,which are clearly defined,what rules do pilots have for flying low level,"outside"of these designated areas? I know in East Anglia there are specific routes for fast jets to and from the East coast ranges etc,but to see an F15 low level in Dorset was something unusual to see....at least for me!
CHINOOKER is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 21:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In that most of your last sentance is incorrect in almost everything it says most of the first para is therefore meaningless

The a/c could not have been flying at more than a 1000ft
I should work on 250' being legal in most of the UK

NoD
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 21:33
  #3 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by CHINOOKER
If possible can anyone shed some light on the rules and regulations for flying military jets at low level in UK airspace!
The reason i am asking,is that on tuesday my wife and i were having a relaxed and pleasant trip through the Dorset countryside,(about 10 miles north of Dorchester),when the front windscreen was "filled" with an F15 from Lakenheath!!......The a/c could not have been flying at more than a 1000ft
Within the rules this was clearly low flying but considerably higher than the normal minimum separation distance mandated by the rules.

As there are specific Low Fly areas within the UK,which are clearly defined,what rules do pilots have for flying low level,"outside"of thesedesignated areas?
Generally outside these designated low flying areas military aircraft are permitted to fly at their minimum separation distance to the next designated low flying area.

Areas where this is not permitted are in the vicinity of military or civilian airfield control zones or active danger areas unless prior approval has been obtain.

Significant centres of population should also be avoided.

A significant centre of population is typically a city, town or village and demoted by the presence of a church. By definition, a hamlet does not have to be avoided as it does not have a church. That said, crews will generally avoid overflying habitation at low level if they see it.

I know in East Anglia there are specific routes for fast jets to and from the East coast ranges etc,but to see an F15 low level in Dorset was something unusual to see....at least for me!
Not strictly true. There are what is known as flow routes. In other words aircraft will all be flying in one direction. The route is not a defined path as in a road.

Finally, with the exceptions mentioned, the whole of the UK is designated for low flying. Low flying areas are an administrative device so that aircraft can be 'in' a particular area at a given time. It is not improbable that they operate in two areas at the same time (ie on the border between two).

After the long answer, he was low but not that low. From what you say, he was in a low flying area.

Now 'my' odd sighting was a pair of F15 clearly sight seeing in an area usually devoid of UK military. They were flying along the white cliffs of Dover and well below us as we descended on the A2.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 22:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this a veiled complaint or fishing exercise?

1000ft aint low. A civvy flying device can fly as close as 501 ft of any person , vessel, vehicle or structure. As for military, I don't care about the rules... Let them fly low, there is a war on you know
microlight AV8R is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 22:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey Hills
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"when the front windscreen was "filled" with an F15 from Lakenheath!!."

That must have been one of those new giant F-1515's. Even an Airbus A380 wouldn't "fill the windscreen".

I suspect you meant 100 feet not 1000. And how did you know it was from Lakenheath?
aviate1138 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 23:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: F8 and Be There
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That must have been one of those new giant F-1515's. Even an Airbus A380 wouldn't "fill the windscreen".
Probably one of those bifocal prescription windscreens you can get from Specsavers....

Go as low as you like near me, just leave the ridge tiles on...

Was camping in the Lake District last year (under great duress from wife and kids) and watched a sucession of low flying a/c over Kendal. Was particularly impressed with the C130 guys who were far lower than the Hawks and some of the Tonkas, even given the large airframe intimidation factor....

MS
Max Shutterspeed is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 23:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It isn't unusual and stop whinging! What you witnessed was perfectly legal.

Ministry of Defence | About Defence | What we do | Air Safety and Aviation | LowFlying | LFAs | Low Flying Area 02

If you feel that you need to make a complaint whinge to the following. They will put you straight!

Ministry of Defence | About Defence | What we do | Air Safety and Aviation | LowFlying | How do I complain about military low flying activity?

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 09:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UFO?

It might have been a UFO made to look like a giant F15?

Reminds me of various calls to Stations to complain about low flying, often late night early morning on nights when everything is tucked up in the hangar and aircrew are conducting eyelid exams.
side salad is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 09:15
  #9 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chinooker, coming from Ruislip, its probably an "event" for you to see a military aircraft "low". If you live in the sticks its practically an everyday occurence.
Gainesy is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 10:48
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ruislip Middlesex,England
Age: 69
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blimey,....what seemed to be a simple "question" seems to have aggrivated some of the "wasps" on this forum!!
Guys,with regard to my post,i was just curious that's all...I AM NOT an officianado of the UK low fly system nor do i spend my spare time clambering up the sides of Welsh mountains!,(prefering instead a hot sunny beach in Barbados),..all i am is someone that has worked in aviaton for the last 40 years and have a keen interest in military aircraft.
As Gainsey rightly says,i live in Ruislip,Middx,so i unfortunately don,t get to see too much in the way of fighters etc,especially at low level as in this instance.
Having been a regular visitor to Dorset over the years,all i have ever seen at low level over land has been helos of one sort or another,so to see an F15 low down was something different....for me at least!!.
With regard to my observations with regard to it,s height,i do live more or less directly under the approach to runway 25 at Northolt,(and have done for the past 27 years),so i tend to know roughly what an a/c at around a 1000ft looks like!.......As for "filling the windscreen" well that was meant to be a bit a bit of a "tongue in cheek" comment,nothing more!,although when you are driving down a B road surrounded by nothing more than hedgerows and fields and an F15 suddenley appears in front of you,it does tend to concentrate the mind somewhat!!
With regard to it being from Lakenheath....Well the big black LN on the fin gave it away....even my eyesight isn't that bad!!
Pontius Navigator....many thanks for your post,you seem to be the only one on here who understood my post.....As for your comments regarding "flow lanes",that must be what i have seen....I have relatives who live in Murrow,Camebridgeshire and thinking about it,the jets i have seen there do all go in the same direction.
TEEJ....Sorry to dissapoint you....I WASN'T COMPLAINING/WHINGEING or MOANING IN ANY WAY!!.....If it wasn't for the fact that the missus was with me,i would have probably parked up somewhere and waited to see if anything else was about!.......The fact that i don't intentionally spend my spare time chasing fighters at low level DOES NOT mean i am against this sort of thing or the aircrew that do it!!
CHINOOKER is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 12:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NOTTINGHAM
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a very convincing backtrack, Chinooker! LN on its tail at 1000ft? I defy you, unless you have got the triple magnifying windscreen available from SpecSavers and the F-15 was standing still!

Stick to spotting, there's a good chap!

FW
foldingwings is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 13:48
  #12 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by CBA_caption
you inferred

CBA
No, no CBA, you inferred.

Chinooker did not imply.





Oh the for the pleasures of ISS
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 16:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CHINOOKER just think, some of the arrogant tossers that replied may one day be in charge of an aircraft with a lethal capability. Does not say much for the psychometrics in the RAF does it? thank goodness they are either in the very small minority or just pretending to have superior knowledge.
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 16:32
  #14 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Scruggs Wonderbus?

When did ISS die? I was on 7 course . I know my daughter did it recently.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 16:58
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CBA_caption - I was of course referring to the fast pointy things but to answer your question how about VC10, Tristar, C17, Dominie, Tucano, Tutor. in the normal sense no more lethal than any civilian hardware. (I think!)
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 17:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: R4808E
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
USAF/Low Flying ???

Now an Omani AF Jaguar, THAT would have filled the windscreen
Navy_Adversary is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 20:00
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chinooker,
My apologies. I read your post after partaking of a bit too much red wine!

Regards

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 20:50
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: One Three Seven, Disco Heaven.
Age: 65
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Now an Omani AF Jaguar, THAT would have filled the windscreen
..and put a nice dent in your roof.
Dan Gerous is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 20:51
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: England
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, no, no, you're all missing the point.....1000' IS low flying for the yanks!!
Fintastic is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2008, 20:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some of the arrogant attitudes to low-flying complaints on here are really quite disturbing. Having a bit of sympathy for folk (and indeed animals) who are shocked and disturbed by low-flying military aircraft is not difficult, is it? I am not arguing about whether it is necessary or not - but is it too difficult for you to imagine how some folk might be disturbed and irritated by it? Especially as the majority of the public were opposed to TELIC?
CirrusF is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.