Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Sixth C-17 arrives.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Sixth C-17 arrives.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jul 2008, 14:24
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glowcesestershiiiire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think back end o the bus flies west to go east now.........if you know what i mean
k1rb5 is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2008, 14:32
  #42 (permalink)  
9.81m/s/s
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Greetings K1 !!! Hope you are ok.

I think I get where you are coming from........85% there I think......not enough time analysing the movements of my betters ( not in a toilet context you understand ) to make it to 100%


http://www.pprune.org/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif
 
Old 6th Jul 2008, 14:34
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glowcesestershiiiire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you got a pm and e-mail mate
k1rb5 is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2008, 14:40
  #44 (permalink)  
9.81m/s/s
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Got it.......and now that I think about it..........I think you are right.

Well done Lewis......now mine's a pint of ale.
 
Old 6th Jul 2008, 16:21
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South of the M4
Posts: 1,641
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
'RAF arm-folding team'.
Seven crew?

I thought the C-17 only need a pilot, co-pilot and a loadmaster.
Warmtoast is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2008, 19:38
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Collected from the Boeing Factory in Longbeach, California on 11 June 2008, the aircraft has since been used for essential front-line crew training.
I'm told this 'essential front-line crew training' involved carrying bags around North America for a famous red formation as they toured the region. Suppose it's Arrows front-line...

Not that I begrudge the C17 crew by the way, they don't often see much more than HERRICK and TELIC.
dallas is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 02:14
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm just totally disappointed they don't carry a Flight Engineer, which is much more efficient than carrying ground maintenance engineers, always has been!

Sometimes I just wonder!!!

Cheers...FD...
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 03:22
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The purchase of the C17 by the RAF RAAF and RCAF, has to be one of the smartest moves made sine the purchase of the C130.

THe introduction into service likewise.

A good job all around

Regards

Col
herkman is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 08:21
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glowcesestershiiiire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm just totally disappointed they don't carry a Flight Engineer
It has been known
k1rb5 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 08:25
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK Sometimes
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FEngs

FD,

I have some symapthy with yr comment re efficiencies of FEs vs GEs. However, there are clear reasons why GEs are more common in aviation these days. It is the civvy world that mostly drives AT ac design and the level of in-flight automation now mostly absolves the need for FEs aboard modern mil ac like the C17/J Herc.

In the civvy world, many if not most, airlines contract out the engineering element for when things go 'ping' down-route. In these airlines, the route structure is well known and contracts can be let to cover most eventualities and so ground-based engineering bods are, in theory, cheaper.

However, in the military, there is little chance of contracting out the ground engineering as few other countries operate the C17/Tri*/VC10/J and, where we go sometimes, one has to fix the ac in 'austere' circumstances!

Therefore, it makes sense to carry GEs and, on occasion SVCs. Either way, there is at least one extra pair of eyes and ears aboard - which always comes in useful when things get a bit 'hairy' - especially 'in theatre' or even down the strip at Limassol!

I am glad and proud to have served with both species of 'spanner monkeys' who, on more than occasion, have dug myself and my crew out of a hole. Great people, one and all.....even Lima Echo!

flipster
flipster is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 08:27
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Odious but for how long?
Age: 53
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahh, an extremely rare picture of Mr Harris in work and uniform!!!!!!


Get the beers in boy
animo et fide is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 08:33
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Quote:
I'm just totally disappointed they don't carry a Flight Engineer
It has been known "

It's a modern aircraft and therefore does not need a Flight Engineer. Any engineering is carried out on the ground hence they carry a Ground Engineer.

K1rb5

You are obviously more gifted with foresight than Flight Detent as you are now an ALM so stop looking back young man and relish the future..............
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 09:07
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glowcesestershiiiire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a modern aircraft and therefore does not need a Flight Engineer. Any engineering is carried out on the ground hence they carry a Ground Engineer.
I fully agree with the above statement. I can't see how anyone could complete the ground servicing requirements of the C-17 whilst supervising the off/on load in the time frame required. The GE and SVC are essential for our type of Ops.

Couldn't resist dangling the hook in the water though. FD may well know another FE who now operates as an ALM. Say hello to M & K from me if you do please.

Bit of thread creep here. Soz
k1rb5 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 09:47
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our ex FE is also doing extremely well and has already made the jump to the Dark Side, so for the grumpy ones out there..............
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 11:05
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glowcesestershiiiire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hear there are more making the move too.........
k1rb5 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 11:07
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Dagobah
Posts: 631
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why they wearing US style growbags then? Do they come with the aeroplane if you buy one?
youngskywalker is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 12:06
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why they wearing US style growbags then? Do they come with the aeroplane if you buy one?
I believe it's a 'warranty' condition, along with the need for the ALM to be there for the loading, which reduces the whole crews duty day. Don't know if there are plans to change SOP now we've bought them, but the danger of that re: flying suits is Boscombe will want one for 'what bits of a C17 does our flying suit snag on'-type trials, which we really can't afford, despite our official position of 'stretch, not overstretch'.
dallas is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 12:13
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glowcesestershiiiire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do they come with the aeroplane if you buy one?
YSW

No need to buy a whole jet dear chap. Couple of quid on fleabay if you really want one.
k1rb5 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 12:21
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Here n there.
Posts: 905
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
They make the girlies and K1rb5 look better than they would in a standard MOD issued suit.
Hueymeister is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2008, 13:33
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glowcesestershiiiire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They do have a bit of extra room for the 'fuller' figure which helps me out obviously.

However, in their defence, all our 'girlies' would look good in any type of flying suit. Not a single 'pillow smuggler' amongst them.

I think it's part of the selection process.
k1rb5 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.