Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Use of engine reverse in flight

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Use of engine reverse in flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 20:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Use of engine reverse in flight

I know the Galaxy is approved to do it. Any other military types?
JammedStab is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 20:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C-17.........
Banggearo is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 21:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harrier ?!

Well, sort of, a bit.

And the Galaxy & C-17 probably try to avoid actually flying backwards.
Double Zero is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 22:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here, there, and everywhere
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Can the C-17 use reverse at idle on approach?
punkalouver is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 22:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No - it can be used in the descent but not with the slats extended (due to the exhaust flow). Even so, and albeit with an acceleration, it can still achieve up to 20,000fpm RoD.

It certainly makes for an interesting (and mostly green) view from the flightdeck of a 200ton jet!

Uncle G
Uncle Ginsters is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 00:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a military type, however, the DC-8 (some series) are approved, inboards only, as I recall.
411A is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 02:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
411A you are indeed correct it was for the -71 & -73 fitted with the CFM motors, I was flying into Lagos with Southern when the Capt used them and for his trouble got wacked on the back of the head by the FE as He was worried about them stowing and being stuck there, as the flt mech I was not overly happy about the situation either
matkat is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 08:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,503
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
All DC8's had reverse thrust on the inboard engines as no speedbrakes were fitted. Flap settings were limited when reverse was used.
brakedwell is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 08:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Mk 1 Andover was cleared for STOL landings from a 6 degree approach selecting reverse just before touchdown.
cazatou is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 08:37
  #10 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
it can still achieve up to 20,000fpm RoD.

It certainly makes for an interesting (and mostly green) view from the flightdeck of a 200ton jet!

Uncle G
I'm tempted to say 'no sh!t Sherlock' but it does sound fairly hairy! I've see empty ones go up like a rat up a drainpipe but 20K per min downwards (intentionally) must give you lots of options in a (mostly brown?) tactical environment.
 
Old 4th Jul 2008, 08:50
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yak 40 centreline engine. It is used for some FSU Military transport.
pp
peterperfect is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 08:54
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Hyperspace...
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Herc K can also do it - the only limitation on use of reverse thrust is a speed one - not above 115kts IIRC. It has been done in the sim to quite dramatic (and controllable) effect (1nm short finals, 5000ft agl, successful landing!)- however, it'd take some cojones to try it in the aircraft....prop hangup, anyone?
TheInquisitor is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 09:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reverse Thrust

The Trident reversed thrust, (outers) could be used anytime, any speed, right down to turning off the runway. Very useful on a shortish runway when you could be pulling reverse in the flare.
Krakatoa is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 11:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 80
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oooer, missus!
exscribbler is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 12:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South of the M4
Posts: 1,640
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
There's a YouTube video of a C-130 landing on the USS Forrestal. The comentary mentions that the pilot selected reverse thrust before landing.

Video here: YouTube - C-130 Hercules on an Aircraft Carrier!!

C-130 landing and take-off sequence starts about 2-mins into the video
Warmtoast is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 14:18
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bakedwell are you sure that the JT 3s had a in flight reverse capability? as my memory thinks they could not, though no speedbrakes as such they had inboard and out ground/flight spoilers that deployed on touchdown spent many an hour in the german cargo hangar rigging them.
matkat is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 15:12
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Minneapolis Mn USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At World, our DC8-63's with the JT3D-7 had inflight reverse capability on the inboards only.
BigJoeRice is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 16:02
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NW FL
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Used to be relatively common procedure on C-130 in Viet Nam...

As mentioned, used during Forrestal trials...

Fairly frowned upon these days as it makes for a rather unpleasant landing!

...overall, not approved however.
US Herk is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 20:40
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: south of 60N
Posts: 257
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With The Gripper you could achieve 15000fpm down and more if you dropped the main wheels at 300kts. Trouble was the self loading cargo didn't like it
wrecker is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 22:19
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South West
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Urban Myth?

Even though it's gated through the WoW on Tornado, it's still a bad idea to pre-select thrust-reverse on approach because if you make a hash of the landing, it kicks-in just as you bounce and makes your second landing even heavier!

N Joe
N Joe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.