Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

NAO report questions UK's ability to meet future airlift requirements

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

NAO report questions UK's ability to meet future airlift requirements

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jun 2008, 15:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,812
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
NAO report questions UK's ability to meet future airlift requirements

From Janes.

Alison Terry, a co-author of the report, said that the difference in the availability rates between the 'K' and 'J' variant aircraft is primarily down to a comparative shortage of spares for the C-130J, which has necessitated the cannibalisation of some aircraft to keep the rest of the fleet flying. The C-130K fleet currently has an abundance of spares, which explains its exceptionally high availability rate.

Why the shortage of spares? That's a question I know the answer to (cost) but it's still hard to believe.
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2008, 16:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
WEBF

Probably down to "just in time" rather than "just in case".

Oh, that and RAB of course. No doubt all the spares were sold off to avoid depreciation and cost of capital charges accrued if they were "on balance sheet" .
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2008, 17:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Couldnt they have been purchased through PFI? That way, we could hide them off the balance sheet, like gordon has with approximately 35% of GDP...
VinRouge is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 18:22
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,812
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Here is an analytical article by Craig Hoyle:

UK Royal Air Force facing potential tactical transport crisis

NAO recommendations include investigating the possible purchase, lease or charter of interim airlift capability, upgrading simulators and addressing spare parts shortages for the C-130J, and filling more than 100 engineering vacancies at RAF Lyneham in Wiltshire. These and other efficiency improvements could lead to aircraft being available for an extra 800 days a year, it estimates.

These 100 engineering vacancies wouldn't be the ones that were LEANed, would they?

On a positive note, the RAF's sixth C-17 has arrived - according to the MOD website.
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.