Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Low level fast jets over Silverstone 25/6

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Low level fast jets over Silverstone 25/6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jun 2008, 08:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northamtptonshire
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low level fast jets over Silverstone 25/6

Today (wednesday 25th) around 09:20 we had two fast jets low level across Silverstone circuit. As today is tyre testing the circuit is full of people so wondering if this was official or not?

Well spaced but feeling from some people who were near said it looked dangerous. Anyone know who and why?
powerless is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 08:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Being motor racing fans on tyre day they'd know
tonker is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 08:57
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northamtptonshire
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tonker

My point was not that it was dangerous, I am sure the crew know what they are doing, have all eventualities covered and it was 100% safe. My point is that Joe public see it as dangerous and that maybe doesn't help aviation in general.

Just wanted to know what it was and if it was some practice prior to the GP.
powerless is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 09:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair enough.

Every now and then we get people on board who claim that we were only feet away from peril, and that ATC and TCAS must have been in on it. Not the published 1000'

I used to fly into Turweston and always made a point of flying over Silverstone just to have a gander. Problem always was that everbody else did the same, so on a saturday it resembled a big wing!
tonker is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 09:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The front end and about 50ft up
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My point is that Joe public see it as dangerous and that maybe doesn't help aviation in general.
I don't know much about Alaskan crab fishing but I certainly think it looks dangerous. Perhaps policy should be left to those knowledgeable in the field, based on facts, rather than trying to placate those who, from a position of ignorance, think it looks a bit dicey. Maybe greater public exposure to Alaskan crab fishing and low flying operations is the answer.
Fg Off Max Stout is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 09:19
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northamtptonshire
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We get lots of trafic across silverstone including a fair number of military ones and the more the merrier I say. They mil ones are often low level and great to watch but because of the huge number of people here today suprised by this one.
powerless is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 09:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Euroland
Age: 53
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like my grandmother used to say, don't fly to high and too fast as if low and slow would be safe
bArt2 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 09:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 36 Likes on 14 Posts
And of course there are lots of large obstacles above Silverstone circuit, must be very dangerous to fly in an open sky.


Maybe they were just showing LH that he doesn't actually drive that fast after all, or maybe showing 'Big Fin' support to Kimi Räikkönen.
ZH875 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 09:29
  #9 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
You have to remember that all pilots are experts in steering a stricken aircraft clear of schools, hospitals, homes for the sick and infirm, homes in general, and any large gathering of people
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 09:29
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was a NOTAM published warning of the "huge number of people" at Silverstone today? If not (as I suspect) then how would the tonker drivers or indeed any other airman be aware???

Silverstone is always going to be chosen as a turning point or nav check feature for the reasons tonker has already pointed out.
Spanish Waltzer is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 09:35
  #11 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did they have red flying suits? Could have been the Kwik Fit Fitters wanting to see yer tyres.
Gainesy is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 09:40
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northamtptonshire
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't have access to the NOTAMs but would have thought so.

From the responses I guess I won't bother asking anything in future. Thanks
powerless is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 10:11
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Powerless's statement about public perception is a valid one... and answers from the likes of FG Off Max Stout are not exactly helpful.

There have been numerous threads here and on other forums bemoaning the lack of public appreciation and the shoddy treatment our servicemen and women receive compared to days of old.

Whilst probably totally correct regarding the actual safety of the fly past, throw away comments like Max Stouts which belittle members of the public are not the sort of thing that will enhance the perception of the forces.

Silverstone is obviously a high profile place this week - what sort of reaction do you expect to get from ill informed members of the public who are not lucky enough to have flown for the military or even served alongside those who have?

Attitudes like those shown by the minority are one of the reasons why Joe Public does not connect with the Armed Forces today
anotherthing is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 10:40
  #14 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 82
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You get quite a lot of low flying fast pointy things just south of Northampton

Just a point though, Silverston has an active airfield in it's midst so, unless they had permission to overfly, then it could be dangerous if they caught something taking off.
green granite is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 11:08
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Personally as a non-aviator I find it extremely difficult to judge altitudes by eye. The first time I ever walked up to a Tornado on the ground I was expecting it to be vastly larger, more the size of an F-15, so presumably up to that point I had been overestimating.

Much as I assume average aircrew probably wouldn't be much cop at estimating focus distances, one would not expect a cameraman to do a pilot's job or a pilot to do a cameraman's job...

That said there does seem to be a general attitude of "bugger the rules" which is of course fine until someone puts a fast jet through the side of a tower block in a moment of excess.

P
Phil_R is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 11:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UTOPIA
Posts: 111
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe it was Rodders again.........
12 twists per inch is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 11:42
  #17 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That said there does seem to be a general attitude of "bugger the rules"
Really? On what do you base this statement? Have you ever seen a low level sortie planned or briefed?
Gainesy is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 11:47
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Northants
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
actual safety of the fly past
anotherthing - who said it was a flypast? The original post simply said jets overflew - a very different thing.
Flap62 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 11:52
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I couldn't give a rat's rear end about what's said in a briefing, I'm referring to everyone from Colin Strong and Duff Hart-Davis, through Pablo Mason, right up to this very forum where people winkingly say things like "...at about 250 feet...".

I'm not particularly worried; I expect people to know what they're doing and follow the rules where necessary; that said, if you're going to break the rules, you'd better be very sure you know what you're doing.

P
Phil_R is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 12:01
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Just a point though, Silverston has an active airfield in it's midst so....
There doesn't appear to be a NOTAM out for Silverstone today or until the end of the month so it is unlikely anyone, civil or military, would be aware of any unusual activity. Silverstone is listed as a Heliport and does not appear to attract any sort of ATZ so overflight is quite legal. Likely just to be aircraft routeing through the area.
Background Noise is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.