Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF tests Omega-owned tanker aircraft

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF tests Omega-owned tanker aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jun 2008, 16:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Far far away
Age: 53
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF tests Omega-owned tanker aircraft

In the public domain - from Flightglobal.com:

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...-aircraft.html

I won't reproduce it all here, just this bit:

The RAF says the recent sorties were performed under a reciprocal agreement with the USN, which makes frequent operational use of its Lockheed TriStar and Vickers VC10 tankers. "It was not a case of there being a lack of available aircraft," it notes.
Which is interesting: there was no mention that anyone had suggested there was a lack of available aircraft, so why specifically say there wasn't?
D-IFF_ident is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2008, 21:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A lot closer to the sea
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps because they know that people on here would start a slow news day red-top story by saying there was??
Methinks the gentleman protests too much. ( or something like that)
WhiteOvies is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2008, 23:31
  #3 (permalink)  
FFP
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Each Tornado received a total of 8,170kg (18,000lb) of fuel through two contacts during the 3,700km (2,000nm)
Just 2 brackets ? For the northern sea track (I presume ?)

What were the abort airfields ? What system of fuel planning do they use ?
FFP is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 06:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
No doubt they're well up to speed on RAPS?

My info. is that the RAF is using this private military contractor 'because of the VC10 capability gap'......
BEagle is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 08:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxon
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So could this be the first nail in a fast closing coffin??
dessert_flyer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.