Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

William borrows a company Vehicle.....

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

William borrows a company Vehicle.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Apr 2008, 21:01
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Oh god 136 posts and this still drags on weeks, months, years after the event
Totally agree. Fact is, the rest of the world has moved on.
goudie is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2008, 21:25
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Home visit

Well in terms of P.R. It was a home goal, though of course the message is, " Sod you lot, so what, I'm Royal you know"...

Exactly how many Chinooks are going spare for real training or use in Afghanistan ?

I expect a few Harrier pilots would have liked to drop in on their girlfriends, or as a last ditch alternative wives, for all I know it may have happened.

At the Southern England civilian airfield where I worked, there was a period when a 2-seat Jaguar happened to have to do a Navex arriving every Friday, departing Monday mornings...
Double Zero is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2008, 21:36
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that Deja Vu, finger trouble or an actual comment ?

The mention of months & years makes me think you're referring to something other than the recent 'helo jollies...


P.S, Nothing can be as sickenining as 'the whole Diana thing'...
Double Zero is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2008, 21:40
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just dug out my old log book, one entry goes like this: CYBG[RCAF Stn Bagotville} cross country to CYQY{Sydney Nova Scotia} Nav trip{who the F-- are we kidding? we went further than that on a normall intercept} Translation, pick up 800lbs of lobsters for squadron piss up! My how times have changed!The only thing to watch was dont let them drip on the eight 50cals, makes for stickey breach blocks!
clunckdriver is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2008, 21:41
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Headlines

Originally Posted by Tightflester

"Small Medium at Large”


Well, it always cheers me up!
Apologies for prolonging the thread creep but I still chuckle at
"Nut screws washers and bolts"
I'm sure you know the story ...


JD
Jumbo Driver is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2008, 21:51
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The front end and about 50ft up
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the Southern England civilian airfield where I worked, there was a period when a 2-seat Jaguar happened to have to do a Navex arriving every Friday, departing Monday mornings...
And I have a friend who when on AFT at Valley had their house and spouse near Wittering, as did the QFI. They were often programmed last wave on Fri and first wave on Mon. By carrying out mandatory, authorized, syllabus sorties, on these trips, they were able to derive a perq at no cost to the RAF. What exactly is the problem with that?

By kneejerking to ill-informed reaction amongst members of the media and public, who understand little about the RAF modus operandi, the RAF runs the risk of becoming an environment where any personal perqs must be eradicated, and the attractive side of military life gets chipped away a little more. This happened a few years ago with the thankfully shortlived 'no landaways that can be perceived as enjoyable' ruling - all thanks to another media scoop. Those who know nothing about RAF ops and training should not be the ones determining policy.
Fg Off Max Stout is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2008, 22:05
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Max Stout,

I'm all for 'useful jollies' in every sense, keeps everyone happy while also hopefully useful training ( and it seems to me any time in the air is useful ) ; but exactly how many people get that priviledge ?

Not the groundcrew or even junior aircrew for sure...

I was on a supposedly civilian airfield but dealing with exclusively military aircraft and helped in my tiny way in their development - if you are lucky and skilled enough you're flying them now.
Double Zero is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2008, 22:26
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The front end and about 50ft up
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dunsfold? Don't worry, I doubt that I'm lucky or skilled enough to be flying their products! HArrier mates may get all the good chat up lines, but wokka mates get the girls!

Not the groundcrew or even junior aircrew for sure...
I have on occasions dropped off sqn groundcrew half way round a navex thus saving them a long journey on public transport!
Fg Off Max Stout is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2008, 22:42
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zummerset
Posts: 1,042
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Double 0,
Harrier mates don't drop in to see girlfriends;

1. They have a perfectly good mirror in the mess, in the cockpit and in the car for emergencies...

2. The jet might get dirty; Field Ops was VERY GR3/RAFG....

3. Somebody MIGHT see GR7/9 in a field and suggest they go back to doing it.....

Banter aside, please do not tar RW operators with the same brush that you treat FJ aviators. I've often taken groundrew on training trips where the destination has included a "good time", I've also delivered cars/luggage when it was en-route and some training benefit could be proved (before you start, loading a car is good internal load practise for rearcrew...). Astonishingly, in the RW force we actually trust our Junior Pilots so they come too...!!!

Sorry to rain on your egalitarian soapbox...but, if you were in a position after all the hard work to be on a front line Sqn I'd bet you'd take what few perks were left.....
Evalu8ter is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2008, 23:03
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect you & I are both at a misunderstanding; as I said I'm all for any 'useful' flying one can get, and god knows anything to help ground / junior crew is desparately needed, never more than now.

As you have the space, it would be daft not to take up other closely involved people I agree, & laud your efforts...
Double Zero is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 07:51
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: R4808E
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"One has been a very sortie boy" headline in the soaraway today, also "Wills gets out his chopper at Sandringham" again in the Sun Red Top.

More 'navigation' exercises revealed.
Navy_Adversary is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 09:38
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: France
Age: 83
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... now they are telling us that -

it was a COLLECTIVE error of judgment and William is holding his hands up for it as much as the RAF.

If he doesn't know the collective from the cyclic should he be driving "Wokas" at all !!

rogerk is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 09:48
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Right, that's 150 extremely interesting posts!
goudie is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 09:49
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: here, there and everywhere
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is everybody so "up in arms". Find me an aircrew mate who has never flown over somebody they know. I'm more bothered about some Iraqi that gets £2 mil when our injured hero's get next to nothing. Error of judgement on both accounts.
ramp_up is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 10:06
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 37 Likes on 15 Posts
HE must have done very well on his Flying and Skiing tour of the RAF, as according to the tabloid rags he is to become a Royal Knight of the Garter, joining the most senior British order of chivalry.

Is that because his Queens Golden Jubilee Medal looked lonely when he was photographed next to his father with his Tin Sheriffs and Blue Peter Badges


So that's a big and a very well done sir, now do you need your bottom wiping again.

Last edited by ZH875; 23rd Apr 2008 at 10:17.
ZH875 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 10:58
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Location: Location:
Age: 56
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PRINCE WILLIAM sparked fury last night after landing his £15,000-an-hour RAF helicopter in girlfriend Kate Middleton's back garden.
153 posts now and I can't believe that no-one has made any jokes about HRH, choppers and confined areas.

(Have amended this as it was obviously taken out of context. The dailies have been having a field day (pun intended) with Chopper jokes and I honestly thought that those of us who frequent this forum would have seen the post in the (very) light way in which it was intended.)

Apologies to one and all.

Last edited by Dan D'air; 24th Apr 2008 at 08:11. Reason: Opprobrium.
Dan D'air is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 13:37
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 82
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I presume you believe that making crude and offensive sexual comments on a public forum about a serving officer and his girlfriend is acceptable because he is a Royal and so not entitled to the privacy, respect and consideration due to the rest of the population.
Clockwork Mouse is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 13:53
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,337
Received 630 Likes on 272 Posts
Clockwork - no, I think Dan d'air did it because it's funny
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 13:59
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
because it's funny
Why is it funny?
goudie is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2008, 14:00
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 82
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny? Then he has my sympathy. At least his family and friends do.
Clockwork Mouse is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.