RAF Weston-on-the-Green Under Threat!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: N/W London
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAF Weston-on-the-Green Under Threat!
I'm sorry to report that yet another RAF airfield is under threat from a developer - this time its RAF Weston-on-the-Green in Oxford which as part of one of the government's proposed Eco-Towns, could become part of a 15,000 house town known as 'Weston Otmoor'.
Whilst admittedly Weston has never been much more than a large green field, it is I understand one of the longest continuously operational RAF airfields in the country having been established around about 1914. It is presently used by 1 PTS for Parachute training Monday-Friday, Adventure training for military personnel by a civillian contractor Mon-Fri and at weekends and bank holidays by Oxford Gliding Club - one of the oldest gliding clubs in the country with links to the pioneers of the sport who have been there for over 25 years.
It may be more familiar to you all as D129 on the CAA Half-Mil map, however the airfield has also featured in Blue Peter several times (the famous John Noakes has jumped there!) and it also made an appearence in the documentary series 'P' Company.
Admittedly I have a vested interest in fighting this proposal, the loss of the airfield not withstanding, this proposal is wrong for so many other environmental reasons too and the irony of 'Eco-Friendly' sports being squeezed out by an Eco-town seems to be lost on the developers! The airfield comprising some 135 ha is also dismissed by the developers as an 'airstrip' and the scheme promoted as 'Brownfield'.
The RAF & MODs position is not yet clear, however what this says about the future of military parachuting is also of interest as I understand that excluding Salisbury Plain, there are very few locations in the south of England that can be used for non SF parachute training.
The full details of the Eco-Town proposals can be found here:- http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/pdf/livinggreenerfuture
and please note that as we are now in a consultation phase, representations can be made in accordance with the document by the 30th June 2008.
In addition there is a petition on the 10 Downing Street website calling for the Weston Otmoor proposal to be dismissed and whilst this deliberately, does not make mention of the loss of the airfield itself, I would draw this to your attention and would invite you to sign up to this. The link to the petition is: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/WestonOtmoor/
Please help save Weston-on-the-Green!
(Moderators - please would you consider making this a Sticky at least until after the end of June)
Whilst admittedly Weston has never been much more than a large green field, it is I understand one of the longest continuously operational RAF airfields in the country having been established around about 1914. It is presently used by 1 PTS for Parachute training Monday-Friday, Adventure training for military personnel by a civillian contractor Mon-Fri and at weekends and bank holidays by Oxford Gliding Club - one of the oldest gliding clubs in the country with links to the pioneers of the sport who have been there for over 25 years.
It may be more familiar to you all as D129 on the CAA Half-Mil map, however the airfield has also featured in Blue Peter several times (the famous John Noakes has jumped there!) and it also made an appearence in the documentary series 'P' Company.
Admittedly I have a vested interest in fighting this proposal, the loss of the airfield not withstanding, this proposal is wrong for so many other environmental reasons too and the irony of 'Eco-Friendly' sports being squeezed out by an Eco-town seems to be lost on the developers! The airfield comprising some 135 ha is also dismissed by the developers as an 'airstrip' and the scheme promoted as 'Brownfield'.
The RAF & MODs position is not yet clear, however what this says about the future of military parachuting is also of interest as I understand that excluding Salisbury Plain, there are very few locations in the south of England that can be used for non SF parachute training.
The full details of the Eco-Town proposals can be found here:- http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/pdf/livinggreenerfuture
and please note that as we are now in a consultation phase, representations can be made in accordance with the document by the 30th June 2008.
In addition there is a petition on the 10 Downing Street website calling for the Weston Otmoor proposal to be dismissed and whilst this deliberately, does not make mention of the loss of the airfield itself, I would draw this to your attention and would invite you to sign up to this. The link to the petition is: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/WestonOtmoor/
Please help save Weston-on-the-Green!
(Moderators - please would you consider making this a Sticky at least until after the end of June)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Closer than you think...
Age: 65
Posts: 390
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To be honest, given it's prime location and potential for conversion to the normal very crowded new housing estates you seem to get these days and the obvious dislike by the higher echelons of Nue Labour for things military I'm really surprised that it's not already been sold off....
Mind you, given this Governments track record and especially that of the current idiot in charge (you know, the one who sold the gold at a knocked down price, gave millions of our hard earned pounds away by the bucket full to tin pot African countries and failed miserably to save some of the countries money for the coming hard times) It's not really surprising they are considering selling as the banks stop lending, the country is entering a housing slump and developers are looking to reduce building the things as well as laying workers off because the house's aren’t selling...
mmm sell when the price is low, typical.... fiscal incompetence at it's best.
Still never mind.... it's not as though DE have had much luck over the years in getting rid of that other Airfield often mentioned in here that's just up the road is it? what was it called now... RAF Bi###t#r?
Mind you, given this Governments track record and especially that of the current idiot in charge (you know, the one who sold the gold at a knocked down price, gave millions of our hard earned pounds away by the bucket full to tin pot African countries and failed miserably to save some of the countries money for the coming hard times) It's not really surprising they are considering selling as the banks stop lending, the country is entering a housing slump and developers are looking to reduce building the things as well as laying workers off because the house's aren’t selling...
mmm sell when the price is low, typical.... fiscal incompetence at it's best.
Still never mind.... it's not as though DE have had much luck over the years in getting rid of that other Airfield often mentioned in here that's just up the road is it? what was it called now... RAF Bi###t#r?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: All Bar One
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As someone wo lives in Bicester and jumps at Weston every weekend this is bad news on so many levels (parochial ones I will admit). All I can hope is that if it does go ahead it will take as long as the RAF Bicester and Upper Heyford developments and not actually amount to anything
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: N/W London
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spectre,
Whilst I share your sentiments, the Government have indicated that they will be looking to commence construction on the first of these Eco-Towns in 2010 with occupation by 2012.
If you feel as strongly as I do about this (we may have actually seen each other) then please do sign the petition and respond to the consultation by the 30th June 2008. PM me if you want to speak offline about this.
Whilst I share your sentiments, the Government have indicated that they will be looking to commence construction on the first of these Eco-Towns in 2010 with occupation by 2012.
If you feel as strongly as I do about this (we may have actually seen each other) then please do sign the petition and respond to the consultation by the 30th June 2008. PM me if you want to speak offline about this.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oxenfforrdde
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spectre 150
Live in Bicester myself, & have been watching the RAF Bicester saga on and off/signed the petition.
Am I not right in thinking that the buildings etc on that Field are listed due to being the only historical ones of their type surviving, and that this might prevent developement ?
Buggerit. Summer wouldnt be right without the gliders there all the time anyhoo !
Am I not right in thinking that the buildings etc on that Field are listed due to being the only historical ones of their type surviving, and that this might prevent developement ?
Buggerit. Summer wouldnt be right without the gliders there all the time anyhoo !
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Back from the sandpit
Age: 63
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tyres
I believe you are confusing RAF Bicester with RAF Weston-on-the-Green. I doubt if any of the buildings at WOTG are listed but know that the hangars at Bicester are. Having said all that I would like to suggest that anybody who lives in the area signs the petition. I have actively jumped/instructed at RAF WOTG from 1982 until the early part of this century. I also live in Bicester and the amount of traffic around this area due to lack of infrastructure is astounding, Bicester has also been constantly refused any increase in leisure facilities due to the lack of said infrastructure. Now they are talking about taking away some of the leisure facilities we do have (Skydiving & Gliding) and adding to the traffic problem, remember builders build houses for profit and will not improve the road system as there is no profit in it. As these are most definately aviation related sports, I urge all to sign.
I believe you are confusing RAF Bicester with RAF Weston-on-the-Green. I doubt if any of the buildings at WOTG are listed but know that the hangars at Bicester are. Having said all that I would like to suggest that anybody who lives in the area signs the petition. I have actively jumped/instructed at RAF WOTG from 1982 until the early part of this century. I also live in Bicester and the amount of traffic around this area due to lack of infrastructure is astounding, Bicester has also been constantly refused any increase in leisure facilities due to the lack of said infrastructure. Now they are talking about taking away some of the leisure facilities we do have (Skydiving & Gliding) and adding to the traffic problem, remember builders build houses for profit and will not improve the road system as there is no profit in it. As these are most definately aviation related sports, I urge all to sign.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whilst admittedly Weston has never been much more than a large green field, it is I understand one of the longest continuously operational RAF airfields in the country having been established around about 1914
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: N/W London
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spheroid,
If I honestly thought that selling WOTG to a developer would buy supressant foam for C130s, additional support helicopters, improve Married Quarter Facilities or even ensure that there was enough body armour to go around then I'd be more sympathetic to this proposal but come on, we all know that any monies from the developer will go straight into the Treasury's coffers and be swallowed up and squandered on some other hair brained initiative.
Even if you are not concerned about the loss of yet another airfield, or the loss of recreational facilities for both civilians and military personnel (remember - mid week this facility is for YOUR benefit assuming you are in the services), then do please consider whether this greenfield location which is prone to flooding in the winter is the right location for another 10 - 15,000 houses? Anyone who lives around the area will know what the M40 & A34 is like now, think it can handle another few thousand cars and thats before you consider the already planned expansion of Bicester to the east.
I hope I'm wrong but very soon I can see this whole area as one urban sprawl linked up with Oxford.
Also, as far as I am aware military parachuting has not yet been officially declared obsolete - does not the loss of a great DZ concern you?
I must say that as a regular civilian guest to this forum on Pprune, I am surprised that so many seem so willing to let another part of the RAF's history and another piece of countryside disappear in the interests of UK PLC.
If I honestly thought that selling WOTG to a developer would buy supressant foam for C130s, additional support helicopters, improve Married Quarter Facilities or even ensure that there was enough body armour to go around then I'd be more sympathetic to this proposal but come on, we all know that any monies from the developer will go straight into the Treasury's coffers and be swallowed up and squandered on some other hair brained initiative.
Even if you are not concerned about the loss of yet another airfield, or the loss of recreational facilities for both civilians and military personnel (remember - mid week this facility is for YOUR benefit assuming you are in the services), then do please consider whether this greenfield location which is prone to flooding in the winter is the right location for another 10 - 15,000 houses? Anyone who lives around the area will know what the M40 & A34 is like now, think it can handle another few thousand cars and thats before you consider the already planned expansion of Bicester to the east.
I hope I'm wrong but very soon I can see this whole area as one urban sprawl linked up with Oxford.
Also, as far as I am aware military parachuting has not yet been officially declared obsolete - does not the loss of a great DZ concern you?
I must say that as a regular civilian guest to this forum on Pprune, I am surprised that so many seem so willing to let another part of the RAF's history and another piece of countryside disappear in the interests of UK PLC.
Sorry to hear yet another Historic site may be going but its just one of a very long list. Rather not waste money keeping a seldom used site going when other Fully Operational sites are struggling with poor services and MQ's.
Good to see a Hercules dropping parachutists into Weston this morning.
Meanwhile, local protests yesterday against the eco-town plan for the site made the local TV news last night. Also:
BBC NEWS | UK | Eco-town protesters holding demo
Meanwhile, local protests yesterday against the eco-town plan for the site made the local TV news last night. Also:
BBC NEWS | UK | Eco-town protesters holding demo
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am sorry, but those people are NIMBYs. We have a housing shortage in the UK; what is wrong with using a defunct forces base to build essential infrastructure or housing? or would you prefer they churn up the green belt?
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
VR - the Govt is trying to create new towns under the pretext of green-ism. Each house will have a windmill, more insulation and low energy light bulbs etc.
In reality every house will have two cars, and they'll commute 40 miles each way to work. They'll fly with Stelios several times a year and the environment will get pasted just the same.
What irks people is not so much the new housing, which is needed, I agree, but the shameless token-ism of creating a "Green community", when really it's just more sub/urban sprawl.
In reality every house will have two cars, and they'll commute 40 miles each way to work. They'll fly with Stelios several times a year and the environment will get pasted just the same.
What irks people is not so much the new housing, which is needed, I agree, but the shameless token-ism of creating a "Green community", when really it's just more sub/urban sprawl.
Vin Rouge, you're a bit unfair.
In essence - and I wish I were joking - in the name of environmentalism, the Weston Otmoor development would rip up a huge swathe of farmland (WOTG is only a small part of the proposed area for development, which straddles the A34), destroy at least one Site of Special Scientific Interest, dramatically overburden the already stressed infrastruture of North Oxfordshire and - even if only 50% of the households living in the new development had one occupant who commuted by car - would add another 7,000 vehicles a day to the A34, which is already way over capacity at peak times (and frequently out of peak times).
Because the necessary public transport infrastructure doesn't exist, and wouldn't fit on the northern side of the proposed area of development, it has to sprawl to the south so that a railway station can be built onto an extant rail line - which would need to expand services dramatically. So that the inhabitants living on the north side of the development could reach the railway station, a bridge will have to be built across the A34 (which will only increase the traffic problems during the period of construction, slowing the A34 and increasing CO2 output), and the developers say that Junction 9 of the M40 will need to be completely redeveloped.
So, this eco-friendly town will destroy green belt land and sites that are supposedly protected, increase the amount of road traffic, kill off large numbers of small and fluffy things that live in the area, overburden the local infrastructure and increase CO2 output.
In answer to your question,"would you prefer they churn up the green belt?" that is exactly what the planners are proposing to do...
In essence - and I wish I were joking - in the name of environmentalism, the Weston Otmoor development would rip up a huge swathe of farmland (WOTG is only a small part of the proposed area for development, which straddles the A34), destroy at least one Site of Special Scientific Interest, dramatically overburden the already stressed infrastruture of North Oxfordshire and - even if only 50% of the households living in the new development had one occupant who commuted by car - would add another 7,000 vehicles a day to the A34, which is already way over capacity at peak times (and frequently out of peak times).
Because the necessary public transport infrastructure doesn't exist, and wouldn't fit on the northern side of the proposed area of development, it has to sprawl to the south so that a railway station can be built onto an extant rail line - which would need to expand services dramatically. So that the inhabitants living on the north side of the development could reach the railway station, a bridge will have to be built across the A34 (which will only increase the traffic problems during the period of construction, slowing the A34 and increasing CO2 output), and the developers say that Junction 9 of the M40 will need to be completely redeveloped.
So, this eco-friendly town will destroy green belt land and sites that are supposedly protected, increase the amount of road traffic, kill off large numbers of small and fluffy things that live in the area, overburden the local infrastructure and increase CO2 output.
In answer to your question,"would you prefer they churn up the green belt?" that is exactly what the planners are proposing to do...
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 430 Likes
on
227 Posts
Vin Rouge, you're a bit unfair.
Vin Rouge
In case you had missed it, there is a mass of housing available in the UK just right now. Houses, and lots of them, are for sale everywhere. There is a huge and growing myth in the UK that we need to build hundreds of thousands of new houses, a myth perpetuated by............ the house building companies.
Near I am, planning permission was sadly granted for the building of some 23 000 new homes. Unfortunately since then there has been a bit of a crash and the house building firms are now bleating that they can no longer afford to meet their side of the bargain ie that as part of the approval they had to put in the roads, services, schools and doctors surgery etc. Funny old thing that. Either that or they want to add lots more homes to the already planned numbers, and yet they cannot sell those they have already built.
Weston-on-the Green is an active airfield, as Bicester was, and we should fight to protect them. I note that NIMBY-ism is the new insult for all those that would like to protect the environment they live in.
In case you had missed it, there is a mass of housing available in the UK just right now. Houses, and lots of them, are for sale everywhere. There is a huge and growing myth in the UK that we need to build hundreds of thousands of new houses, a myth perpetuated by............ the house building companies.
Near I am, planning permission was sadly granted for the building of some 23 000 new homes. Unfortunately since then there has been a bit of a crash and the house building firms are now bleating that they can no longer afford to meet their side of the bargain ie that as part of the approval they had to put in the roads, services, schools and doctors surgery etc. Funny old thing that. Either that or they want to add lots more homes to the already planned numbers, and yet they cannot sell those they have already built.
Weston-on-the Green is an active airfield, as Bicester was, and we should fight to protect them. I note that NIMBY-ism is the new insult for all those that would like to protect the environment they live in.
What's with the Otmoor connection? As a non-local who used to use the Range' at Otmoor many moons ago on/from the Canberra OCU at Bassingbourn its' quite a way from WOTG.