Boeing withdraws tanker appeal
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boeing withdraws tanker appeal
Boeings objection to tanker deal withdrawn.
Reported by ji Row, Washington
cheers
Reported by ji Row, Washington
In a shock move Boeing has withdrawn its appeal for the USAF Air to air refuelling deal citing commercial reasons.
In a meeting today the board of Boeing has been made aware of the recent purchase of shares in which EADS (a European aircraft company) now has a controlling stake in the Boeing aircraft company
EADS had taken advantage of the US Dollars plunging international value and cheap European loans to invest in US companies over the last few months.
A spokesman from EADS is quoted as saying "it made more economic sense to buy the controlling stake in Boeing rather than compete against it in the international market", EADS intends to continue to manufacture jets in The US with some minor changes.
Boeing Chief executives were unavailable for comment, but industry insiders are saying Boeing's management didn't even see this coming, "it just crept up on them" said one stock market analysts.
Senators are already calling for a ban on foreign ownership of companies involved with national security.
EADS have released a press notice stating their commitment to US manufacture, with some changes to manufacturing in the metric system, work hours, and holidays being brought in line with European standards, additional targets are a 25% reduction in staffing, not in numbers just in weight
In a meeting today the board of Boeing has been made aware of the recent purchase of shares in which EADS (a European aircraft company) now has a controlling stake in the Boeing aircraft company
EADS had taken advantage of the US Dollars plunging international value and cheap European loans to invest in US companies over the last few months.
A spokesman from EADS is quoted as saying "it made more economic sense to buy the controlling stake in Boeing rather than compete against it in the international market", EADS intends to continue to manufacture jets in The US with some minor changes.
Boeing Chief executives were unavailable for comment, but industry insiders are saying Boeing's management didn't even see this coming, "it just crept up on them" said one stock market analysts.
Senators are already calling for a ban on foreign ownership of companies involved with national security.
EADS have released a press notice stating their commitment to US manufacture, with some changes to manufacturing in the metric system, work hours, and holidays being brought in line with European standards, additional targets are a 25% reduction in staffing, not in numbers just in weight
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Not Bad! - I nearly fell for it.. 
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL thanks.. I liked the "25% reduction in staffing, not in numbers just in weight". at the end I put that in so no one took it too seriously..
I must admit to a bit of a chuckle as I posted that.
I must admit to a bit of a chuckle as I posted that.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Comes close to Dick Smith's declared intention to take a Jumbo under Sydney's harbour bridge Gathering crowds watched an elephant go by on a barge!!
What was the last aircraft to fly under that bridge? Choppers don't count.
Must be a few after Lancaster G for George.
What was the last aircraft to fly under that bridge? Choppers don't count.
Must be a few after Lancaster G for George.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wasn't a farmer brown type from way out west prosecuted a few years ago for flying his ultralight under the bridge? I seem to recall his defence was that he didn't realise he wasn't allowed to do so.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Almost right......
http://www.mediaman.com.au/articles/harbour_bridge.html
Harbour Bridge stunt lands pilot in deep water
Harbour Bridge stunt lands pilot in deep water, by Natalie Gregg
- 5th May 2004
(Credit: The Courier Mail)
A former flight instructor and Griffith University graduate is being investigated after flying a plane under the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Saturday.
Authorities were baffled as to why Louise Campbell, 23, of Geebung on Brisbane's north side, carried out the brazen stunt – which could result in a two-year jail term.
Two investigators were interviewing Ms Campbell yesterday in the first stage of a joint inquiry with the Civil Aviation Safety Authority.
CASA spokesman Peter Gibson said Ms Campbell faced serious charges and could lose her licence.
"If she was found guilty of reckless and dangerous flying – that carries a maximum two-year jail penalty," Mr Gibson said.
Ms Campbell was believed to be flying the single-engined Gazelle with the plane's owner, Sunshine Coast aerial photographer Peter Bellingham, as a passenger.
Mr Gibson said it was illegal to fly under the bridge where the carriageway is 59m above the water.
He said only police and emergency aircraft were allowed to fly under the bridge.
Ms Campbell took off from Bankstown airport and followed a scenic flight route that was supposed to end at the Opera House.
Pilots must contact air traffic control to gain permission to fly the route, and can request to do a circle over the water before they return to the airport.
Ms Campbell told police she did not know flying under the bridge was illegal.
Mr Gibson said Ms Campbell was a commercial pilot as well as an ultralight pilot and should have known better.
"She must have understood the reasons why she shouldn't have flown under the bridge," Mr Gibson said.
Ms Campbell drove back from Sydney on Monday.
She refused to comment when approached yesterday. Her boyfriend said she was seeking legal advice from a specialist aviation lawyer.
Ms Campbell obtained her commercial pilot licence in June 2001 through Griffith's School of Aviation and Arena Aviation. She was awarded Arena Student of the Year Award in 2001.
As an instructor she worked at Redcliffe's Australian Air Flying School until February this year.
Since then she has worked as a charter pilot for Mr Bellingham's aerial photography company.
Mr Bellingham did not wish to comment.
The Federal Government had previously identified the Sydney Harbour Bridge as a top terrorist target and NSW police have employed 24-hour security guards for the bridge since November last year.
A spokesman for federal Transport Minister John Anderson said it was impossible to prevent aircraft from flying near the Harbour Bridge. Instead the Federal Government was controlling aircraft licences.
"By July 1 all pilots will be issued photographic licences, to replace paper licences," he said.
"All current and future licences will involve background checking by a number of intelligence agencies including ASIO."
A spokesman for Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said the Government was concerned with any breach of security, but this incident was a breach of regulations.
http://www.mediaman.com.au/articles/harbour_bridge.html
Harbour Bridge stunt lands pilot in deep water
Harbour Bridge stunt lands pilot in deep water, by Natalie Gregg
- 5th May 2004
(Credit: The Courier Mail)
A former flight instructor and Griffith University graduate is being investigated after flying a plane under the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Saturday.
Authorities were baffled as to why Louise Campbell, 23, of Geebung on Brisbane's north side, carried out the brazen stunt – which could result in a two-year jail term.
Two investigators were interviewing Ms Campbell yesterday in the first stage of a joint inquiry with the Civil Aviation Safety Authority.
CASA spokesman Peter Gibson said Ms Campbell faced serious charges and could lose her licence.
"If she was found guilty of reckless and dangerous flying – that carries a maximum two-year jail penalty," Mr Gibson said.
Ms Campbell was believed to be flying the single-engined Gazelle with the plane's owner, Sunshine Coast aerial photographer Peter Bellingham, as a passenger.
Mr Gibson said it was illegal to fly under the bridge where the carriageway is 59m above the water.
He said only police and emergency aircraft were allowed to fly under the bridge.
Ms Campbell took off from Bankstown airport and followed a scenic flight route that was supposed to end at the Opera House.
Pilots must contact air traffic control to gain permission to fly the route, and can request to do a circle over the water before they return to the airport.
Ms Campbell told police she did not know flying under the bridge was illegal.
Mr Gibson said Ms Campbell was a commercial pilot as well as an ultralight pilot and should have known better.
"She must have understood the reasons why she shouldn't have flown under the bridge," Mr Gibson said.
Ms Campbell drove back from Sydney on Monday.
She refused to comment when approached yesterday. Her boyfriend said she was seeking legal advice from a specialist aviation lawyer.
Ms Campbell obtained her commercial pilot licence in June 2001 through Griffith's School of Aviation and Arena Aviation. She was awarded Arena Student of the Year Award in 2001.
As an instructor she worked at Redcliffe's Australian Air Flying School until February this year.
Since then she has worked as a charter pilot for Mr Bellingham's aerial photography company.
Mr Bellingham did not wish to comment.
The Federal Government had previously identified the Sydney Harbour Bridge as a top terrorist target and NSW police have employed 24-hour security guards for the bridge since November last year.
A spokesman for federal Transport Minister John Anderson said it was impossible to prevent aircraft from flying near the Harbour Bridge. Instead the Federal Government was controlling aircraft licences.
"By July 1 all pilots will be issued photographic licences, to replace paper licences," he said.
"All current and future licences will involve background checking by a number of intelligence agencies including ASIO."
A spokesman for Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said the Government was concerned with any breach of security, but this incident was a breach of regulations.
