Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Journo asking a question.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Journo asking a question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Mar 2008, 14:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North East England
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Journo asking a question.

Hi forgive the intrusion but I just need a bit of background on a story I have picked-up.

Today's Newcastle Evening Chronicle claims a Tornado made an emergency landing at Newcastle airport after suffering a "double engine failure."

Obvioulsy I'm going to check this out through the RAF media people but before I do that I've a couple of questions.

Bearning in mind the Chronicle may have got something wrong. The pic shows a GR4 but the story implies the machine was used in air defence.

That aside...A double engine failure gives me the impression the thing must have glided in. Would they do this, flying over heavily populated areas? I'd have thought a double engine failure would have required the use of Martin Baker equipment out over the oggin.
.

Cheers

Dan
tyne is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 14:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Tyne

I hope you get the reply you need. If true then they have got balls as big as Jupiter, I would have pulled the black and yellow handle.
Tigs2 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 15:04
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What newspaper do you report for?

I'm sure you'll agree that this does depend on the circumstances of the situation. We would try not to use the Martin Baker as much as possible.

I've not read the story, however, I will be looking it up.
RAFEmployee is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 15:09
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North East England
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I work for a North East radio station. I have also done a lot of work with the military over the years. SIMPRESS for JMC's , NATO and FOST's mobile sea training people.... stuff like that.

A wannabe sailor who has duff eyes but that's another story.

Cheers for your replies.

Dan
tyne is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 15:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a drill to get the engines re-lit after dbl eng failure. Possibly worked on at least one of them me thinks...
L J R is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 15:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stamford
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It does seem incredibly unlikely. With reverse thrust unavailable and lack of any arrestor cables to engage even if they manage to get it on the tarmac (huge kudos to anyone who can manage that) stopping would be difficult if not impossible in the runway available.

I'm guessing here but perhaps what they had was a double generator failure?
Stuff is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 15:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...don't tell him your name, Pike...
olderbloke is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 15:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Not too sure but it's damn cold
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well don't quote me, but...

If it were an F3, air defence, then after a double engine failure you are relying on an emergency ram air turbine to provide minimal hydraulics for control surface movement and a battery for electrics. The GR 4, to the best of my knowledge, uses a different emergency back for hydraulic supplies.

Now for an F3 the RAT doesn't, due to required airflow and airframe position, provide enough hydraulic power to make an emergency landing feasible. You'll have to ask a mud about the GR 4.

More than likely in my humble opinion, if it were a double anything failure, would be double generator. With no onboard AC production capability you are flying an electric aeroplane with the equivalent of a couple of duracell providing all of your power needs. It is therefore a situation best remedied ASAP before you become so much tumbling steel and titanium.

So, long story short and I re-iterate I do not know the particulars of this incident. Double engine failure, no chance. Double Gen, it'll make your eyes water but so long as you get on the ground sharpish, hence potentially the use of a Civvy field, you should be home for tea and medals.

Hope that helps when you speak to them that know in corporate comms.

Editted to add: As LJR points out, just because something failed doesn't mean it stayed failed!
artyhug is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 15:26
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North East England
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks chaps, just contacted the RAF press people who are checking it out for me.

All the best

Dan.
tyne is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 16:37
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North East England
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talked to a really helpful chap from the RAF.

As I suspected it's not quite the story as reported. A technical fault and a precautionary landing....No dead Tornado minus engines making a dramatic silent landing at Woolsington.

Cheers again for you advice.

Dan Entwisle.
tyne is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 20:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that was a refreshing change, Journo pops head over parapet, and lives to tell the tale.

Well done chaps
kokpit is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 21:30
  #12 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
here here!
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 22:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mornington Crescent
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed. Tyne, you've set a new record for journalistic survival here! Congrats.
BluntM8 is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2008, 00:54
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,838
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
As I suspected it's not quite the story as reported.
Never believe what you read in the papers, or hear on the radio come to that.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2008, 12:04
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North East England
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do I get a ***** tie pin or at least a Tee-Shirt to mark the occasion?

I don't want to kick off a new journo debate, but I've always been of the mind that if you don't know something ask. Shame more people in my game don't have that view.

Dan
tyne is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2008, 19:20
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sitting on the toilet of Europe.... the UK
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do I get a ***** tie pin or at least a Tee-Shirt to mark the occasion?
Yeah no problem. You just have to collect it in person from the lads on the front line in the Sandy place........You can then report back to all those Gob-sh!tes back home who are quick to slag off our lads and lasses and tell them exactly what we are all doing
Faithless is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.