Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Hail and farewell HMS Exeter

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Hail and farewell HMS Exeter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th May 2008, 07:59
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's good to see you chaps have totally grasped the concepts of Joint Operations.
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 10th May 2008, 09:16
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amazing how a thread can morph so much.

A proud old ship (and her crews from over the years) now tarred by the bleeding WAFU, once again bleeting on about the "seajet"
glad rag is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 16:28
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 80
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Mighty X is indeed a proud old ship - just look at the photos in this month's Warship World to see her leaving Gib at 25 knots! IMHO the WAFUs aren't bleating about the SHAR - they're trying to point out the error of the ways of the MoD in scrapping it so early. And anyway, WAFUs never bleat about anything.

BTW, I was talking to a Scottish guy on the Gare du Midi in Brussels last Monday (a long story) and he tried to tell me the Tornado is to be navalised for the one new RN carrier, He also said two carriers will be built but one will go to the French.

Comments, anyone?
exscribbler is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 16:36
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I was talking to a Scottish guy on the Gare du Midi in Brussels last Monday"

I can definitely deny that one for sure!!
glad rag is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 16:59
  #25 (permalink)  
fake wafu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I nearly choked on my near-beer when I read that the Tornado might be navalised after all these years. I hope they beef the hook up.....
 
Old 13th May 2008, 19:08
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flight Ops Dept
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I nearly choked on my near-beer when I read that the Tornado might be navalised after all these years. I hope they beef the hook up.....
The German Navy flew them of carriers so it has already been navalised.
blue monday is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 19:23
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 80
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Said Jock also seemed convinced that only 4 T45s will be built; if so we can forget Defender and Duncan. If they're cancelled, that's jobs lost in Scotland - but then the money has to be found for today's backtrack on the 10p tax rate.

I couldn't believe a navalised Typhoon, either. Mind you, I sometimes find it difficult to believe a land-based one.

How many carriers has the Bundesmarine?

Having lit the blue touch paper...
exscribbler is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2008, 14:10
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Royal Navy ships at sea with no guided missiles on board

Two Royal Navy destroyers could not fire their missiles if they came under attack – because they have been removed to save cash.

The News can reveal that Portsmouth-based Type 42s HMS Exeter and HMS Southampton have been working without their Sea Dart guided-missile system since Christmas. To go with the cutbacks, at least half a dozen operating crew have been transferred to other ships.


I believe similar issues also exist with other ships.
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2008, 16:56
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SOMEWHERE
Posts: 289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The German Navy flew them of carriers so it has already been navalised"

Really ??? that must have been the carriers called GNAS Schleswig and
GNAS Eggebeck !!

The German Navy Tornado's that I worked with at TTTE must have been
the first sleath navy Tornado's as they looked just like normal Tornadoo's !!
scarecrow450 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 01:52
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Said Jock also seemed convinced that only 4 T45s will be built; if so we can forget Defender and Duncan. If they're cancelled, that's jobs lost in Scotland - but then the money has to be found for today's backtrack on the 10p tax rate.

They have to build those two ships, I have always wanted something worthy being named after me lol

Duncan
dunc0936 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 07:56
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two Royal Navy destroyers could not fire their missiles if they came under attack – because they have been removed to save cash.

The News can reveal that Portsmouth-based Type 42s HMS Exeter and HMS Southampton have been working without their Sea Dart guided-missile system since Christmas. To go with the cutbacks, at least half a dozen operating crew have been transferred to other ships.

I believe similar issues also exist with other ships.
What a fantastic "non" story. How about another headline....

RAF JET FLIES WITHOUT WEAPONS
SOLDIERS CARRY ARMS WITHOUT AMMO
Its not news that we are short of weapons or money.....
spheroid is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 08:33
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 37
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't seem to be out of service.

Link.
http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/...onWebDoc.12968

Same goes for HMS Southampton.

Link.
http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/...onWebDoc.12883
Rob_1707 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 09:00
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just for my own interest, how much would one of these cost if sold??

Duncan
dunc0936 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 10:12
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: FL410
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spheroid - your examples are not quite the same thing...
Seems to me that your argument could extend to deploying SSBNs without Trident - it would be easy to get some out to the boat if they were really needed surely?
The whole point of having a Navy is that is can remain on station for long periods... which is why Ships generally deploy with stores that are suitable for the unexpected. I guess the significant part of the fleet that sailed from Gib for Op Corporate were fairly thankful that they were fully armed beforehand. Returning to the UK would have been slightly inconvenient...
D O Guerrero is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 11:10
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Navaleye
The sharpshooter of the Falklands Campaign. Two A4s at 250ft at 19 miles, 1 Learjet at 41,000 ft, 1 Canberra at 38,000 ft. Farewell old girl, you did us proud.
Certain HMS Cardiff personel would dispute the Canberra claim!!

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=67322

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/sho...2&postcount=20
XV277 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 11:21
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lincs
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The blue on blue by Cardiff was Gazelle XV377 iirc, shot down in the early hours of 6 Jun 82 with the loss of its crew. RIP.
Magic Mushroom is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 11:59
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SOMEWHERE
Posts: 289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Gazelle XV377"

XX377 perhaps ?
scarecrow450 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 19:25
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unless they`re in the habit of `shooting down` a SR.N5 Warden (XV377) then you might well be correct.....
HalloweenJack is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 19:32
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: england
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Widger, you seem to have neglected to mention the SH chaps. I'm pretty sure the BN crew took part in Corporate.
Lurking123 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 20:06
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spheroid - your examples are not quite the same thing...
Seems to me that your argument could extend to deploying SSBNs without Trident - it would be easy to get some out to the boat if they were really needed surely?
The whole point of having a Navy is that is can remain on station for long periods... which is why Ships generally deploy with stores that are suitable for the unexpected. I guess the significant part of the fleet that sailed from Gib for Op Corporate were fairly thankful that they were fully armed beforehand. Returning to the UK would have been slightly inconvenient
2 Points.... Firstly, the ships taking part in Springtrain had already expended weapons during the exercise and therefore were not fully armed prior to being dispatched south. BUt that isn't a problem because thats what RFAs are for ...

Secondly....how long was resolution in service patrollomg the ice before it had poseidon fitted ????
spheroid is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.