Marham shelters
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 55
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Marham shelters
since last viewing Marham on google earth, its had an update- and there are some shelters now extant on the ASP. Are these temporary for an exercise or a new addition? havent been on site for about 5 years, anyone in the know?
I'm guessing as I've not been to RAF Downham Market for years (wahoo!
) but I'd say that they're a permanent fixture after the Bruggen squadrons went in there. Unless it's that squadron of auroras that got moved in a few months ago to replace the PR9s....
) but I'd say that they're a permanent fixture after the Bruggen squadrons went in there. Unless it's that squadron of auroras that got moved in a few months ago to replace the PR9s....
Some chap called Sir I believe...
The Rubbs were put up for a trial by one of the sqns, to see how much better the GR4 serviceability is if it's kept out of the rain. They have now mostly been removed seeing as the 4 sqns at Marham are ridiculously cramped into the 2 HAS sites.
The Rubbs were put up for a trial by one of the sqns, to see how much better the GR4 serviceability is if it's kept out of the rain. They have now mostly been removed seeing as the 4 sqns at Marham are ridiculously cramped into the 2 HAS sites.
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
............ to see how much better the GR4 serviceability is if it's kept out of the rain.
Last edited by forget; 29th Feb 2008 at 14:48.
Didn't you know there's a difference between sitting in the rain on the line, and whizzing around through clouds and other watery met phenomenon? It's a different KIND of rain doncha know???
GR's don't like moisture, that's why they're so much more reliable in sandier places...
GR's don't like moisture, that's why they're so much more reliable in sandier places...
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: AT/AARterton
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Believe they have been removed.
There was a wet/dry trial to do with serviceability. 9 Sqn had the Rubbs and 31 Sqn got wet (and on some occasions very wet). It was decided to fill the rest of the line with Rubbs as serviceability went up a lot and it kept people like me dry whilst servicing the Tonkas. 31 Sqn had the 6 shelters on the left hand side of the line and the singleton out the back on the same side, and we worked out of the purpose built line building. 9 Sqn had the 5 from the right and the 2 at the rear.
There was a wet/dry trial to do with serviceability. 9 Sqn had the Rubbs and 31 Sqn got wet (and on some occasions very wet). It was decided to fill the rest of the line with Rubbs as serviceability went up a lot and it kept people like me dry whilst servicing the Tonkas. 31 Sqn had the 6 shelters on the left hand side of the line and the singleton out the back on the same side, and we worked out of the purpose built line building. 9 Sqn had the 5 from the right and the 2 at the rear.
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
as serviceability went up a lot
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
I expect the benefit was most felt by the human component; rather than keeping the aircraft dry!
If you ever tried to work on a car outside in cold, windy and wet conditions, or more comfortably within a nice warm garage - It would seem obviously easier to complete a servicing task out of the wind and rain whilst remaining cosy and dry!
It would guess the same goes for electric jets!
If you ever tried to work on a car outside in cold, windy and wet conditions, or more comfortably within a nice warm garage - It would seem obviously easier to complete a servicing task out of the wind and rain whilst remaining cosy and dry!
It would guess the same goes for electric jets!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Wales
Age: 63
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
seeing as the 4 sqns at Marham are ridiculously cramped into the 2 HAS sites.
That has to be a nightmare and a disaster waiting to happen.
Srennaps
Of course you're assuming they have two squadrons worth of aircraft on each HAS site ....
Not that that would be a problem. Two aircraft in HAS ops work fine .... provided you ensure the canopy on the aircraft at the back of the HAS is down and locked before you start the negines on the one in the front!
Of course you're assuming they have two squadrons worth of aircraft on each HAS site ....
Not that that would be a problem. Two aircraft in HAS ops work fine .... provided you ensure the canopy on the aircraft at the back of the HAS is down and locked before you start the negines on the one in the front!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Wales
Age: 63
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes mate, I agree. I knew a lad that blew a rear canopy off, many years ago now.
I also agree two aircraft in HAS ops works fine and we use to do it all the time during cold war exercises. But that was under one Sqn and one control. Having said that, I doubt the two Sqns mix their aircraft in a HAS.
However; two lots of Sqn Ops, two lots of SLOC ops, two lots of Rects Control, two lots of Line Control, all in one PBF and one HPS. Two lots of aircrew and two lots of groundcrew, all with their own agenda to meet the daily flying programme.
I may be looking at this too deeply but how is tool and POL control implemented. Imagine four fuel bowsers trying to refuel one Sqn's aircraft for a quick turnround when the others Sqn's aircraft are just launching or returning from a sortie.
Maybe things have changed since I left the Tonka Sqn environment. Maybe the two Sqns are now just number plates and the pool of manpower just fly or work any of the aircraft. How sad that would be if it has gone that way. Anybody know?
I also agree two aircraft in HAS ops works fine and we use to do it all the time during cold war exercises. But that was under one Sqn and one control. Having said that, I doubt the two Sqns mix their aircraft in a HAS.
However; two lots of Sqn Ops, two lots of SLOC ops, two lots of Rects Control, two lots of Line Control, all in one PBF and one HPS. Two lots of aircrew and two lots of groundcrew, all with their own agenda to meet the daily flying programme.
I may be looking at this too deeply but how is tool and POL control implemented. Imagine four fuel bowsers trying to refuel one Sqn's aircraft for a quick turnround when the others Sqn's aircraft are just launching or returning from a sortie.
Maybe things have changed since I left the Tonka Sqn environment. Maybe the two Sqns are now just number plates and the pool of manpower just fly or work any of the aircraft. How sad that would be if it has gone that way. Anybody know?
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Wales
Age: 63
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the reply.
Obviously things have changed a great deal since the Sqns returned from Bruggen and I am well out of touch.
I thought 11 were ADV – have they moved to Marham? And as for 16.5, sorry but that went straight over my head.
So where do 9 and 31 hang out these days. Also 2 and 13 for that matter.
Obviously things have changed a great deal since the Sqns returned from Bruggen and I am well out of touch.
I thought 11 were ADV – have they moved to Marham? And as for 16.5, sorry but that went straight over my head.
So where do 9 and 31 hang out these days. Also 2 and 13 for that matter.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We managed to squeeze a pair of Hawks into one of the shelters last year and then the stupid door got jammed part open. Had a delightful time getting the jets out again when we tried to leave the next morning!