RAF opposition to wind farms make The Times front page!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Up North
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There needs to be some sensible policy guidance on this, if objections are raised at the planning permission stage it is far too late.
There is likely to be a tolerable interference level which can be filtered out or localised, acceptable from the perspective of the air defence system.....multiple radars, E3 gap filling etc can cover when needed...add to that operator training, to watch for that suspicious plot entering the wind farm zone!
Of more concern would be interference in overland and low flying training areas. There is a case for keeping wind farms distant from these areas for very understandable flight safety reasons!
Is there further information in the public domain? I think I grasp how the interference or spoofing would occur, but to what extent? How similar is the doppler shift from a rotating wind turbine blade to a fast moving jet aircraft, for exampe? How big are these blind spots? What is the position of the CAA? As I understand it they require consultation on windfarms within 30km of an aerodrome.
There is likely to be a tolerable interference level which can be filtered out or localised, acceptable from the perspective of the air defence system.....multiple radars, E3 gap filling etc can cover when needed...add to that operator training, to watch for that suspicious plot entering the wind farm zone!
Of more concern would be interference in overland and low flying training areas. There is a case for keeping wind farms distant from these areas for very understandable flight safety reasons!
Is there further information in the public domain? I think I grasp how the interference or spoofing would occur, but to what extent? How similar is the doppler shift from a rotating wind turbine blade to a fast moving jet aircraft, for exampe? How big are these blind spots? What is the position of the CAA? As I understand it they require consultation on windfarms within 30km of an aerodrome.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Presumably this also applies to civilian radar ?
Which is one reason why the AD system cannot solely rely on the ATC system - if you want to know why read the 911 report.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 86
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This issue is being looked at on this side of the pond too. Site below has some info and interesting links.
http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhy...terference.asp
hope the link works. If not type it in
Cheers, Bob C
http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhy...terference.asp
hope the link works. If not type it in
Cheers, Bob C
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The CAA have been working on this problem for quite some time, so it shouldn't be a surprise to government. The following document is dated July 06:
CAA Policy and Guidelines on Wind Turbines
Chapter 2 spells out the impact of wind turbines on aviation and given the fact that civilian aviation is now more widespread than military aviation (even low level radar coverage over the sea for oil rig operations is important), it's strange that just military objections are being noted.
CAA Policy and Guidelines on Wind Turbines
Chapter 2 spells out the impact of wind turbines on aviation and given the fact that civilian aviation is now more widespread than military aviation (even low level radar coverage over the sea for oil rig operations is important), it's strange that just military objections are being noted.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps the problem for the military isn't detecting aircraft but also cruise misiles and the like.
I wonder if they've tried radar absorbing paint on the blades?
Edit: Seems the Americans are... "Coating equipment with absorbent or reflective materials to minimize the turbine's radar signature"
I wonder if they've tried radar absorbing paint on the blades?
Edit: Seems the Americans are... "Coating equipment with absorbent or reflective materials to minimize the turbine's radar signature"
Join Date: May 2007
Location: themightyimp
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The CAA will not (generally) protest against windfarms; they will mitigate any potential risk by providing dispensation to allow aircraft to be controlled on SSR only. Fine for the UK military if the Queens enemys only operate in controlled airspace and cooperate by transmitting an SSR code..............
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is there further information in the public domain? I think I grasp how the interference or spoofing would occur, but to what extent? How similar is the doppler shift from a rotating wind turbine blade to a fast moving jet aircraft, for exampe? How big are these blind spots? What is the position of the CAA? As I understand it they require consultation on windfarms within 30km of an aerodrome.
Modern processing presents the doppler return as the correct range and as a single blip in the same way as the traditional image you might have of early pulse radars as beloved by film producers and the like.
The processing algorithyms can filter unwanted echoes, such as that from known windfarms, but also filter out wanted echoes that match the filter criteria.
The doppler return from a target flying tangential to a radar receiver will have exactly the same doppler value as a static target on the ground.
Doppler and filters are not, in thenselves, as complete answer.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If turbine blades (is windmill too old fashioned?) didn't follow the wind around, the problem would be more containable. A turbine pointing axially at the RADAR head would return negligible doppler shift whereas one presented at 90 deg would return the maximum for the rotation rate.
Depending on spacing, do blades reflect and return from each other, thus multiplying shift values?
Depending on spacing, do blades reflect and return from each other, thus multiplying shift values?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: RAF Lincolnshire
Age: 24
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MoD lifts wind farm objections
Looks like the wind farm developers have bought the RAF a new Air Defence radar for Trimmingham. Only another dozen needed!
BBC News - MoD drops opposition to Norfolk offshore wind farms
BBC News - MoD drops opposition to Norfolk offshore wind farms