Tornado 'Combat' Power Throttle Setting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tornado 'Combat' Power Throttle Setting
Hello
For some time I've been wondering about the nature of the Combat setting on the Tornado throttle panel and thought I'd finally ask.
In US aircraft such as the F-15, the throttle has above idle detent points that represent 'Mil' (UK Max Dry Thrust) and 'Max AB' (UK Max Reheat). The big question for me is what the Combat setting provides in the Tornado? Is its function similar to the Vmax switch in PW-220 equipped aircraft?
Thanks
Obi
For some time I've been wondering about the nature of the Combat setting on the Tornado throttle panel and thought I'd finally ask.
In US aircraft such as the F-15, the throttle has above idle detent points that represent 'Mil' (UK Max Dry Thrust) and 'Max AB' (UK Max Reheat). The big question for me is what the Combat setting provides in the Tornado? Is its function similar to the Vmax switch in PW-220 equipped aircraft?
Thanks
Obi
Also can anyone tell me how long the pipe is on the Chinook piss tube?
CG
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moray
Age: 58
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the Tonka RB199 engine, the engine is controlled by either an analogue control unit (MECU) or digital (DECU). In dry range, the engine's primary controlling "loop" at max dry is temperature, measured via optical pyrometers. Selecting combat effectively raises the control point by around 26? degrees. I can't remember the exact figure off the top of my head, but that is the principle.
Er, doesn't that mean that the engine will produce less thrust when the ambient temperature is higher?
I appreciate that on paper this is inevitable, but a twenty-six degree difference between two settings seems, well, slim. So slim that trying to select the higher level on a warm day might effectively make no difference. Presumably I am misunderstanding something.
I appreciate that on paper this is inevitable, but a twenty-six degree difference between two settings seems, well, slim. So slim that trying to select the higher level on a warm day might effectively make no difference. Presumably I am misunderstanding something.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Phil R is correct, gas turbines do produce less thrust at high ambient temps, hence the requirement for hot and high trials to prove performance when the air is hot and thin. Fortunately temps generally reduce when you are in free air and as altitude increases, it tends to be hot on the ground because of reflected heat etc.
The increase in temperature of the controlling loop is sufficient to provide about 10% extra thrust, but at a cost- all the hot end components get cooked and stressed out which eats into the engine life. At the temperatures we are talking about which have reduced from the combustion chamber temps by the time the gas flow gets to the blades (on RB199) or thermocouples in the jet pipe the energy in the fuel is being released more efficiently.
A gas turbine designer wants to burn fuel as hot as possible, but he is always limited by materials technology, at high temps metals do some very strange things. Most modern engines have gas flows hotter than the melting point of the metals immersed in them and it only clever cooling designs that stops everything going quiet suddenly.
The increase in temperature of the controlling loop is sufficient to provide about 10% extra thrust, but at a cost- all the hot end components get cooked and stressed out which eats into the engine life. At the temperatures we are talking about which have reduced from the combustion chamber temps by the time the gas flow gets to the blades (on RB199) or thermocouples in the jet pipe the energy in the fuel is being released more efficiently.
A gas turbine designer wants to burn fuel as hot as possible, but he is always limited by materials technology, at high temps metals do some very strange things. Most modern engines have gas flows hotter than the melting point of the metals immersed in them and it only clever cooling designs that stops everything going quiet suddenly.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In a world of my own
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10% is a bit optimistic in practise. It won't work in the dry range (failure free) as the setting itself requires the throttles to be at the top of the reheat range (there is a switch that has a similar effect, but it's not the 'combat' setting - IIRC it raises the temp 36 deg ish at the cost of engine life). Going from Max Rht to combat has a barely perceivable effect but it 'feels good' psychologically as it's another detent!
GC
GC
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IIRC Ghengis, going to combat removed some of the other controlling loops in the lowest fuel wins argument therby allowing the 199 to run nearer to its own redline. The DECU datum switch raises the temp by 34 ?? and combat by 26 kelvin??. with them both you get more noise but also remember the 104's as fitted to the Bear/Backfire chaser get more thrust wet than the mud movers 103, it's due to an extended m15 and the fact it doesnae look like its been chasing parked cars........
remember less volts = more fuel but no volts = big bill. An in case my old chiefy is on here the lugs on the front of the m10 shaft are not oil ways!! as you told the AOC.......
remember less volts = more fuel but no volts = big bill. An in case my old chiefy is on here the lugs on the front of the m10 shaft are not oil ways!! as you told the AOC.......
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In a world of my own
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I remember seeing a 'no volts' panto - I have never seen fat people run so fast (the skinny people were doing some knots too..).
I think the 'brickodynamics' of the GR were more crippling than the smaller motors ;-)
GC
I think the 'brickodynamics' of the GR were more crippling than the smaller motors ;-)
GC
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St Andrews
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Combat Power
The reheat fuel is also increased when in 'Combat' to maintain the pressure differential across the HP Turbine otherwise just increasing TBT would cause the engine to overspeed and/or blow out the reheat.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So the combat setting is similar to the PW-220 Vmax switch. With Vmax FTIT is increased by 22 degrees, with a 2% increase in RPM. Fuel flow and thrust increases by 4%.
I'm curious as to what restrictions are placed on the Combat setting. Vmax is a non-peace time, guarded switch setting that can only be used for 6 minutes and requires engine inspection after use. If the Combat setting is simply a detent away from Max reheat, I guess there is less of a restriction in its usage?
Obi
I'm curious as to what restrictions are placed on the Combat setting. Vmax is a non-peace time, guarded switch setting that can only be used for 6 minutes and requires engine inspection after use. If the Combat setting is simply a detent away from Max reheat, I guess there is less of a restriction in its usage?
Obi
Last edited by Obi Offiah; 23rd Jan 2008 at 16:08. Reason: typo
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Under a Log
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the Tonka RB199 engine, the engine is controlled by either an analogue control unit (MECU) or digital (DECU). In dry range, the engine's primary controlling "loop" at max dry is temperature, measured via optical pyrometers. Selecting combat effectively raises the control point by around 26? degrees. I can't remember the exact figure off the top of my head, but that is the principle.
IIRC, in the early 1980's also refferd to the War and Peace switch. Selecting COMBAT raised the max TBT by 26 degrees, which also lifted the dry thrust by 28%. Problem was that in the "peace" setting, the engine was unable to obtain the MITL figure so was locked into the higher setting.(on the GR1s anyway)
Also the Throttle had a "Combat detent", again added ex degrees to the TGT and another 20% plus of thrust level at Max Re-heat.
Always fun on an EGR timing the engine through 65% NL to Combat power
IIRC, in the early 1980's also refferd to the War and Peace switch. Selecting COMBAT raised the max TBT by 26 degrees, which also lifted the dry thrust by 28%. Problem was that in the "peace" setting, the engine was unable to obtain the MITL figure so was locked into the higher setting.(on the GR1s anyway)
Also the Throttle had a "Combat detent", again added ex degrees to the TGT and another 20% plus of thrust level at Max Re-heat.
Always fun on an EGR timing the engine through 65% NL to Combat power
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Under a Log
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is the reheat actively ignited or does it simply rely on the EGT to set fire to it?
A "ball" of fuel is released upstrem to the HPT,(Hot Shot Relay!!) the HPT would then ignite the fuel ball which would then pass into the re-heat section. This would then ignite the fuel in the "trough"
A "ball" of fuel is released upstrem to the HPT,(Hot Shot Relay!!) the HPT would then ignite the fuel ball which would then pass into the re-heat section. This would then ignite the fuel in the "trough"
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is confusion here between the datum/low switch which is:
1. Wire locked
2. Increases temperature and therefore thrust in dry power
3. Only very rarely used as the engineers/sooties get grumpy
4. Don't know if it gives extra on top of combat pwr (I spy a good staneval question!)??
Combat power is:
1. A detent post max reheat
2. Gives a bit more thrust
2. Can be used whenever you like (5 mins yadayadayada)
3. Rarely needed as the Tornado has so much thrust and great aerodynamics.
Hope that helps.
Please note that one of the above statements is a lie. If you can't work out which one, you should log off PPRuNe Mil forum immediately. zero/zero I fear this may apply to you!
1. Wire locked
2. Increases temperature and therefore thrust in dry power
3. Only very rarely used as the engineers/sooties get grumpy
4. Don't know if it gives extra on top of combat pwr (I spy a good staneval question!)??
Combat power is:
1. A detent post max reheat
2. Gives a bit more thrust
2. Can be used whenever you like (5 mins yadayadayada)
3. Rarely needed as the Tornado has so much thrust and great aerodynamics.
Hope that helps.
Please note that one of the above statements is a lie. If you can't work out which one, you should log off PPRuNe Mil forum immediately. zero/zero I fear this may apply to you!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mornington Crescent
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does that give you a transient T6 or TPT overheat? Any long term effect on the engine? And if there is a need to maintain a px gradient across the turbines, what happens when you deselect reheat? Do you suck the engine out? And what exactly happens during a "burner pop"?
So many questions...
Blunty.
So many questions...
Blunty.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think both increase TBT/T6/whatever (temperature downstrem of combustion pre reheat!). The 5 min limit prevents any issues, AFAIK its not logged anywhere (the Tornado isn't that clever!) but if the wirelock is broken you will use the higher temp everytime you are near max dry - which could damage the engine, but only life, it isn't going to disintegrate if you use it for 20 mins airborne.
A burner pop is when you deselect reheat, then the reheat goes out, leaving a little fuel in the pipe, then you reselect reheat again (less than 3 secs?) this causes quite a decent bang and can look quite good from outside. Doesn't damage the engine apparently. Did it on the threshold once and someone in a car waiting to cross said it looked very impressive (for a Tornado).
As for the other questions, bluntm8, the engine is totally care free handling, slam the throttles where you like and it will just get on with it. Even know people who have flown backwards and the jet just flops out and the engines cope.
A burner pop is when you deselect reheat, then the reheat goes out, leaving a little fuel in the pipe, then you reselect reheat again (less than 3 secs?) this causes quite a decent bang and can look quite good from outside. Doesn't damage the engine apparently. Did it on the threshold once and someone in a car waiting to cross said it looked very impressive (for a Tornado).
As for the other questions, bluntm8, the engine is totally care free handling, slam the throttles where you like and it will just get on with it. Even know people who have flown backwards and the jet just flops out and the engines cope.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 52
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You only get 'Burner Pop' or Reheat Surge if there is a blanking plate in the reheat purge line on Mk 103 ECU's (controlled by MECU's).
On Mk 104's (controlled by DECU's) you can quite happily Reheat Surge them without the plate, and this usually resulted in a phone call from 'The Management'.
In fact, we used to do it every now and again and use the stopwatch to time how long it took the J Eng O to ring down!
The blanking plates were fitted as a mod during GW1 as deselection of reheat created a large white cloud of fuel vapour behind the jet.
You lot got all panicky about advertising your whereabouts to the baddies!!!
P.S. You can lift the roof off the test bed doing such stunts.
On Mk 104's (controlled by DECU's) you can quite happily Reheat Surge them without the plate, and this usually resulted in a phone call from 'The Management'.
In fact, we used to do it every now and again and use the stopwatch to time how long it took the J Eng O to ring down!
The blanking plates were fitted as a mod during GW1 as deselection of reheat created a large white cloud of fuel vapour behind the jet.
You lot got all panicky about advertising your whereabouts to the baddies!!!
P.S. You can lift the roof off the test bed doing such stunts.