Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

And UAVs Just Got a Bit More Lethal

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

And UAVs Just Got a Bit More Lethal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jan 2008, 07:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,446
Received 1,603 Likes on 735 Posts
And UAVs Just Got a Bit More Lethal

Air-to-ground missile launched from drone

1/21/2008 - HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFPN) -- For the first time, an air-to-ground missile was launched from a full-scale aerial target drone, or FSAT. The test was performed Jan. 9 by Airmen here with Detachment 1 of the 82nd Aerial Targets Squadron.

The FSAT is an unmanned QF-4 Phantom drone that was operated by remote control from a ground station, said Maj. John Markle, the detachment's operations officer.

"This is the first air-to-ground missile fired off an unmanned full-scale aerial target," said Major Markle. "This test is an important part of the Det. 1 mission because it increases survivability of our Airmen going against (surface-to-air missile) threats. Furthermore, it's the first time the drone has been able to shoot back.

"It makes airpower more lethal," said Major Markle. "This is a new high-speed, anti-radiation missile the Navy designed to defeat SAM threats; overall this mission is going to benefit the Department of Defense."

"With this successful test, we have pioneered a new venue to test forward-firing ordnance without risk to valuable air assets or crew members," said Lt. Col. Joel Rush, Det. 1's commander.

The detachment is currently testing F-35 Lightning components, and has conducted tests for the F-22 Raptor as well as the Patriot and HAWK SAM systems.
ORAC is online now  
Old 23rd Jan 2008, 21:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 661
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only reason I can see for this approach (i.e. too worried to use a manned aircraft) is that they were VERY worried about plume ingestion risks. Why was that, novel rocket motor? Is it a new missile, or just a test one? Looks a bit like an air breather (cf meteor) but hard to tell from pics.
JFZ90 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2008, 00:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Hyperspace...
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing new here.

I'd say the MQ-9 is pretty 'full-size', given that it's about as big as an A-10!
TheInquisitor is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2008, 03:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From Aviaiton Week's Ares Blog - http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...f-9aa5cfecfd90


....

The test was carried out on January 9 at Holloman AFB in New Mexico, and is unique because it involves an experimental missile. (The Firebees were firing AGM-65 Mavericks.) In fact, it seems that the Navy and USAF decided to use the QF-4 because the clearance process was simpler than that involved in testing an experimental missile from a manned aircraft. "We have pioneered a new venue to test forward-firing ordnance without risk to valuable air assets or crew members," said Lt. Col. Joel Rush, commander of Detachment 1 of the 82nd Air Target Squadron.

The USAF release oddly does not identify the missile, but it looks like a test vehicle for the Office of Naval Research High Speed Anti-Radiation Demonstration (HSAD) program. Atlantic Research Corp. now part of Aerojet, was awarded the contract to provide a variable-flow ducted rocket, a form of solid-fuel ramjet engine, for HSAD in 2002, and it has continued to be funded via earmarks since then, supported by California Republican Rep. Buck McKeon.

.....

0497 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2008, 04:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a version of the Russian KH-31 which the US Navy is converting for use as a supersonic target.

Nothing to see here folks...move along...
FoxtrotAlpha18 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2008, 18:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 661
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Experimental Missile:



KH-31



Hard to tell if they are identical (airframe?), looks like the motors (2 not 4) maybe the new bit as per above.
JFZ90 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2008, 02:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Ne-gat-ory on KH-31 foxtrot alpha one eight.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2008, 08:04
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
looks like a quad-ramjet.... guessing very long range on that thing...
VinRouge is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 23:05
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Magnetogorsk
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qui quad?

Four? More like two don't you think.

and long range...well, it turned out to be not quite as long as they'd hoped.

Tricky things these ramjets...

At least there are no mooses to terrify at White Sands.

VC
Violet Club is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 13:48
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
It takes more than that little bottle-rocket to scare a moose.
LowObservable is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.