Harriers are Rubbish
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Harriers are Rubbish
.......It says so in the Eastern Daily Press.
http://new.edp24.co.uk/content/news/...A00%3A09%3A367
“They found the Harriers didn't do very well in Afghanistan because they cannot strafe.”
I'm no Harrier man, but what a load of arse.
Some 'expert'
http://new.edp24.co.uk/content/news/...A00%3A09%3A367
“They found the Harriers didn't do very well in Afghanistan because they cannot strafe.”
I'm no Harrier man, but what a load of arse.
Some 'expert'
y journalists!!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...............................................
Well, yes actually, they are Rubbish, slowed from the original spec by ??kts, big winged, wider intake'd, but still manned and flown by bloody hero's. Yeah Mr J ourno you really are on the ball.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My best mate is a Marine Commando and he got back from a 6-7 month tour of Afghan last year, when I met up with him for a few beers after his return I asked him what it had been like, his reply;
"S&*t mate, the worst I've ever seen, lost some good friends and soldiers, was massively impressed with the Harriers though, they saved our asses loads."
I think I'll take the word of a front line Soldier over the clowns at the EDP any day of the week.
"S&*t mate, the worst I've ever seen, lost some good friends and soldiers, was massively impressed with the Harriers though, they saved our asses loads."
I think I'll take the word of a front line Soldier over the clowns at the EDP any day of the week.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Although my experiences are quite a few years out of date now, working with Harrier in the CAS role in FRY always bought a relieved smile to our faces. By far and away the most effective platform and the best 'can do' attitude too.
OK, the story is a bit simplistic...
... and the ID of "Roger Smith" as a "defence expert" is sloppy...
.. but the premise that the Tonkas are valued for CAS in part because they have a working gun, which the Harrier does not, it not incorrect.
... and the ID of "Roger Smith" as a "defence expert" is sloppy...
.. but the premise that the Tonkas are valued for CAS in part because they have a working gun, which the Harrier does not, it not incorrect.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, here is a question from a civilian: Since a guns seems a valuable asset in the CAS environment, and since the Harriers are doing an awful lot in this environment, is it not possible to either a) fit 30mm Adens to the GR.7/9, or b) fit the US GAU25 system to the GR.7/9?
Is this a technical issue or simply a lack of will and/or money? (Though I would think that if you cant afford a half dozen guns you probably shouldnt be sending people off to war.)
Is this a technical issue or simply a lack of will and/or money? (Though I would think that if you cant afford a half dozen guns you probably shouldnt be sending people off to war.)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Harrier gun
The question of why the **** don't we fit a 30mm Aden - or even an off the shelf pylon mounted gunpod ( with relevant quite simple test range trials, & if one wants to be fussy a bit of new weapon aiming HUD software too ) has been asked long ago, and no doubt continues to be so ' in theatre ' !
Put the aircraft name into a search engine, select 'history' then scroll down to 'Harrier Testing'.
I suppose rockets ( and we were openly told the UK had an embarassingly large stockpile soon to time-expire ) look impressive to politicians...
Put the aircraft name into a search engine, select 'history' then scroll down to 'Harrier Testing'.
I suppose rockets ( and we were openly told the UK had an embarassingly large stockpile soon to time-expire ) look impressive to politicians...
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
OK, here is a question from a civilian: Since a guns seems a valuable asset in the CAS environment, and since the Harriers are doing an awful lot in this environment, is it not possible to either a) fit 30mm Adens to the GR.7/9, or b) fit the US GAU25 system to the GR.7/9?
If anyone wants to pay me to be an "aviation expert" I've read some of the following thread so I must be over qualified?
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=306952
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=306952
Rebel PPRuNer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does Harrier have flight profiles more favourable to CAS than Tornado or Typhoon? If so, is a gun the most important consideration in terms of getting the job done in the most frequent CAS scenarios?
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
The real issue is providing the right weapon for the most appropriate effect on the right target.
Few would argue against a JDAM or a 1000lb bomb on a target a 1000 yards or more from own troops. As the enemy gets closer the likelihood of blue casualties (not blue-on-blue) increases.
An accurate 1000lb bomb 100 yards from own forces will 'fix' the enemy problem but with probably unacceptable collateral damage. That said, it was not unknown for US Forces in contact in Vietnam to call in strikes onto their own positions.
The issue therefore is having the full range of CAS weaponry from big bombs down to little bullets. I don't have the books to hand but there are open source tables that tabulate all this.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Harrier Gun
I reckon the post by ‘ Engines’ on the thread linked to says it all – an informative & helpful contribution, sorry I didn’t thank you at the time.
This still leaves us with the relatively easy possibility of putting 30mm Adens on Harriers – our people need such help, not politicians thinking rocket pods look impressive ( we were told in our day – 1992 ish- that the UK had an embarrassingly large stockpile of these, so were first choice before guns to re-design ).
In the last days of BAe Kingston/Dunsfold there was the much mooted SABA – Small Agile Battlefield Aircraft – a bit like a thinking man’s A-10, but unfortunately without all that aircraft’s resilience !
Having photographed various types of carbon fibre damage, I’m not at all convinced it’s a war – worthy material. For much the same reasoning, I’ll be amazed if the Typhoon ever does any useful C.A.S. – it’s like using a Jaguar E-Type to deliver newspapers !
The SABA was I suspect just a BAe smokescreen while closing factories – but it was a turboprop pusher canard design, with an underslung turret mounted, sensor directed big gun – might be quite handy or even a big seller right now ?!
This still leaves us with the relatively easy possibility of putting 30mm Adens on Harriers – our people need such help, not politicians thinking rocket pods look impressive ( we were told in our day – 1992 ish- that the UK had an embarrassingly large stockpile of these, so were first choice before guns to re-design ).
In the last days of BAe Kingston/Dunsfold there was the much mooted SABA – Small Agile Battlefield Aircraft – a bit like a thinking man’s A-10, but unfortunately without all that aircraft’s resilience !
Having photographed various types of carbon fibre damage, I’m not at all convinced it’s a war – worthy material. For much the same reasoning, I’ll be amazed if the Typhoon ever does any useful C.A.S. – it’s like using a Jaguar E-Type to deliver newspapers !
The SABA was I suspect just a BAe smokescreen while closing factories – but it was a turboprop pusher canard design, with an underslung turret mounted, sensor directed big gun – might be quite handy or even a big seller right now ?!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Double Zero, thank you.
Putting Aden 30 on to the GR7 would not be hard, except for the problem with spent links hitting the tailplane - as for the Aden 25. The other problem is that the Aden 30 round really isn't all that good for CAS work. However, there are other rounds in existence that would really improve it quite a bit.
The Aden 25s might still be around, and would be far better, but the gun pod would need to be fixed (decent ammo feeds).
Simplest route to a good gun would be the US GAU-12 system, but there would be some issues with getting the kit into a GR7/9 - there are some fairly big items that need to go into the aircraft, and in the years since it was a true AV-8B we have put quite a few mods in - but not 'rocket' science to fix.
At the time we had plenty of CRV7s around, and they were definitely preferred to guns - although the rockets were also planned to be disposed of, with no further buys.
The biggest obstacle could well be the reluctance of quite a few senior officers to admit that guns are effective - I well remember that the most frequently quoted rationale for taking them off the GR7 and Typhoon was that 'aircraft like this are too valuable to risk using in the guns/CAS role' - but that was considering a more 'Cold War' threat scenario. This debate still goes on - hence UK indecision as to whether to buy gun pods for our JSFs.
The bigger picture was that when bidding for money, 'precision' and 'smart' were the magic words at the time, and nobody would back buying 'non-precision' and 'dumb' weapons.
Just good to hear that Harriers (along with all our aircraft, fixed and rotary wing) are doing the best they can with what they have - because they are flown and supported by the best crews in the world.
Engines
Putting Aden 30 on to the GR7 would not be hard, except for the problem with spent links hitting the tailplane - as for the Aden 25. The other problem is that the Aden 30 round really isn't all that good for CAS work. However, there are other rounds in existence that would really improve it quite a bit.
The Aden 25s might still be around, and would be far better, but the gun pod would need to be fixed (decent ammo feeds).
Simplest route to a good gun would be the US GAU-12 system, but there would be some issues with getting the kit into a GR7/9 - there are some fairly big items that need to go into the aircraft, and in the years since it was a true AV-8B we have put quite a few mods in - but not 'rocket' science to fix.
At the time we had plenty of CRV7s around, and they were definitely preferred to guns - although the rockets were also planned to be disposed of, with no further buys.
The biggest obstacle could well be the reluctance of quite a few senior officers to admit that guns are effective - I well remember that the most frequently quoted rationale for taking them off the GR7 and Typhoon was that 'aircraft like this are too valuable to risk using in the guns/CAS role' - but that was considering a more 'Cold War' threat scenario. This debate still goes on - hence UK indecision as to whether to buy gun pods for our JSFs.
The bigger picture was that when bidding for money, 'precision' and 'smart' were the magic words at the time, and nobody would back buying 'non-precision' and 'dumb' weapons.
Just good to hear that Harriers (along with all our aircraft, fixed and rotary wing) are doing the best they can with what they have - because they are flown and supported by the best crews in the world.
Engines
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somerset
Age: 68
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is some well-informed comment about CAS and guns on this thread
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=306952
And Harriers are fantastic! 6 years well spent for me
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=306952
And Harriers are fantastic! 6 years well spent for me