Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Airports forcing troops to change on tarmac?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Airports forcing troops to change on tarmac?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Dec 2007, 11:49
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: birmingham
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let me elaborate

I can probably pull out me old training folder and its written in there somewhere that millitary crew cannot travel in uniform whilst in civilian airport, and that training manual nearly 6 -7 years old..

When checking in military personnel on a certain airline its also stated on the passengers itinerary's that passengers have to be in civilian clothes.

If a whole load of military personnel fly out regularly from civilian airport on a regular basis don't ppl think that airport will be a target??

Last edited by slimjim007; 31st Dec 2007 at 12:06.
slimjim007 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2008, 16:56
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Missouri, USA
Age: 64
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up We Luv Bangor

Speaking on my own behalf, we LOVE to fly into Bangor! You will not ever meet a nicer bunch of people.

We meet all kinds in our travels and TDY's, some good, some not so.
A10Mechanic is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2008, 00:35
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracey Island
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let me elaborate
I can probably pull out me old training folder and its written in there somewhere that millitary crew cannot travel in uniform whilst in civilian airport, and that training manual nearly 6 -7 years old..

When checking in military personnel on a certain airline its also stated on the passengers itinerary's that passengers have to be in civilian clothes.

If a whole load of military personnel fly out regularly from civilian airport on a regular basis don't ppl think that airport will be a target??
Yes do elaborate...You work at not for BIA your training manuals are your company manuals. This is not a BIA policy. It has also already been established that individual airlines have their own policies which BIA has no control over.
Your last observation would be a fair assumption if it were not for the fact that all airports are targets. In case you haven't noticed its far more common and easier for them to attack innocent civilians.
call100 is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2008, 09:35
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I may be a bit outdated on this one, but didn't the HQ 38/1 GP ops manual 1/08 have guidelines for this type of scenario. It was the manual that listed all the Ascot schedules and flight numbers etc....
dionysius is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2008, 10:49
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Jenkins - I hope you got the cabin staff to keep them well lubricated!
BEagle is online now  
Old 2nd Jan 2008, 13:04
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oxford
Age: 85
Posts: 458
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Angry What to do !

The only thing that can be done (and it needs many of us to do it ) is to write to our MP and demand that he/she investigates this shameful matter ASAP and reports back ! Have done this to mine (might work as it is our esteemed Tory party leader !) Will keep on as reqd..

IN THE MEANTIME I WISH ALL OUR SERVICE PERSONNEL A HAPPY NEW YEAR (BETTER THAN 2007 !) WITH MY THANKS AND RESPECT FOR A JOB WELL DONE DESPITE THE FORCES (VARIOUS ! ) WORKING AGAINST THEM !
Bill Macgillivray is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2008, 07:33
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 759
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The topic was briefly mentioned on the Today programme this AM in the first 'Review of today's papers' ........ never to be mentioned again

.............. or did I go back to sleep?
FantomZorbin is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2008, 07:46
  #128 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,428
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
The Herald
ORAC is online now  
Old 3rd Jan 2008, 09:16
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: gla
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old news that won't go away

I have a letter on file from the MOD stating that George Robertson had issued instructions that military personnel could travel in uniform. One of the first things he did when made Sec of Def and a jolly good idea.

However the letter was caveated that the final decision rested with local commanders who may modify things in light of the prevailing local security situation. In practice this means that because an incident involving someone in uniform may adversely affect a CO's future career whilst the positive aspects of uniform wearing have little or no positive effects, the prudent (and spineless) commander will always rule against uniforms in public.
GIATT is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2008, 09:24
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From the Herald
An MoD spokesman said: "We can confirm the incident occurred but because everyone is on leave, we have not been able to discover who gave the order.
So, when they're on leave Officers can't be contacted.
Very convenient!
goudie is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2008, 09:43
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Several miles SSW of Watford Gap
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GIATT

That is reflected in the current RAF dress regs available on the RAF website:

0110. All RAF personnel at UK units should normally wear civilian clothes when they are not required for duty. However, unless otherwise ordered, No 1 and No 2 uniform modes may be worn routinely in public, on public transport, on foot or in private transport. This ruling must take into account security implications and a commonsense approach to local situations. The remaining paragraphs of this Chap also detail particular situations when uniform can and cannot be worn. Local orders, i.e. SSOs, SRO’s, etc, will detail current circumstances regarding the wearing of uniform. Uniform is not to be worn on the following occasions:
a. When participating in non-Service parades (e.g. on Remembrance Day, Battle of Britain Day, etc) serving officers are forbidden to wear uniform if conditions require them to appear in the ranks with serving or ex-Service personnel below commissioned rank. This does not preclude the wearing of uniform by those officiating at a saluting base or appearing officially with a party of civic officials.

b. Uniform is not to be worn by prospective or adopted parliamentary candidates at political meetings, or while canvassing, appearing in public or engaged in any other activities connected with their candidature.

c. Uniform is not to be worn at functions where fancy dress is worn; the wearing of uniform of obsolete design, which is clearly distinguishable from the pattern currently worn, is, however, permitted.

d. Uniform is not to be worn by personnel engaged in temporary or part-time civil employment or while seeking such employment.

d.[stet] When visiting Public Houses or places of entertainment and/or consuming alcohol, unless at a recognised Service function or when officially representing the Service at an external function.

f. Relaxed Dress. There may be occasions when a relaxed form of dress is appropriate, such as in DOR activities. Any Commanders proposing to initiate a relaxed dress policy is to obtain formal approval from the Chairman of the Dress Policy Committee.
Not that this helps in the case is hand in particular; however, the policy is clear that RAF uniform can be worn in public (but only the blue variety!)
Climebear is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2008, 10:27
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,764
Received 228 Likes on 71 Posts
however, the policy is clear that RAF uniform can be worn in public (but only the blue variety!)
Well, I'm a member of the public and would be delighted to see Armed Forces personnel (of whatever persuasion), wearing any uniform they care to, in our midst. A similar thread to this ran (a year ago?) re LHR. The 'policy' seems to be a bit of a shambles IMHO. Of course security considerations should be paramount, but the defensive attitude of 'play it safe' even to the ludicrous extent featured by this thread is surely a security threat in its own right? What better way to encourage those within our midst who would harm us than to see that our own forces appear intimidated and apologetic about wearing uniform? The robust policy of the US strikes me as the more appropriate. The spontaneous support there comes with the routine recognition of the Armed Forces in their midst that we, the British Public, are in the main denied. You guys and girls want to wear your uniforms with pride, we want to take pride in seeing you doing so, and in our midst. Time for a brave decision I'm afraid Minister! As regards companies, be they airports, airlines, shops, or whatever, that deny entry/service to our Armed Forces in uniform, name and shame them I say, and their lick spittle excuses such as not wishing to alarm their customers!
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2008, 10:37
  #133 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Time for a brave decision I'm afraid Minister!
Something we've not had for a long time in this country
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2008, 11:56
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nigit
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the BBC just now (it's even made it to the yoof station, Radio 1!), an MOD spokesman said "Troops were not entitled to wear uniform when not on duty"

Well, that clears it up then! So when we're on the way home we're not on duty then?
ProfessionalStudent is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2008, 12:36
  #135 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
When I was on the baby officers leadership course, it was made clear that all RN personnel were available for duty 24/7, unless on leave. Thus coming back on board totally p!ssed was an offence, as the minimum expected of any rating or officer was to be able to fight a fire. Too drunk to use an extinguisher = appearance at Captain's table.

However, it seems that leave from sandy/rocky places starts when personnel leave their unit sandyside, (regardless of the length of time it takes to get to the UK to enjoy the leave) so it may be true to say that those on the tarmac are on leave (in the main) and so not on duty.

It's still a load of t@sh that having lads/lasses in uniform at civilian airports presents a security threat, IMHO.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2008, 13:12
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: scotland
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My understanding is that service personnel travelling on AT (which includes civvie charter) at any time are on duty, except when indulging. My further belief is that personnel travelling to/from R&R are not indulging. IMHO the MoD spokesman, if he was describing the events at Birmingham, was wrong.

Ed Sett
EdSet100 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 20:32
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sitting on the toilet of Europe.... the UK
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Airline concerned was Omni Air whos pilots were instructed by some desk jockey also known as a a "mover" at the MOD to divert /conduct of soldiers etc
Incidentally the reason charters are used is because the RAF stil fly Tristars which ony Vietnam and Ethopian regional carriers tilluse because they are so unreliable, more unreliable even than the Nimrod.
Now we Know who
Faithless is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 20:54
  #138 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,574
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
So, if a terrorist incident occurred while military personnel (not in uniform) were on scene at the airport or elsewhere, they would be simply expected to say "Sorry, we're on leave" and walk away....
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 6th Jan 2008, 15:06
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread or atleast the main story has now made it onto ITV teletext.
Page 318 in the "And Finally" section, wait for the pages to change and you'll see the Troops forced to change on Tarmac news item.
Razor61 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2008, 10:10
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 38
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a trial, I guess, and 'cos I'm like that, I flew from Luton to Inverness and Edinburgh back to Luton with the Orange coloured airline last week. The only comment I received was from another pax on the EDI-LTN leg who commented that it was nice to see an officer travelling in uniform. I'll keep the trial going!
Flying_Scotsman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.