Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Aussies receive new NH90

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Aussies receive new NH90

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Dec 2007, 02:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aussies receive new NH90

Perhaps i should send this link to your PM and advise him that now and again, it is advisable to spend a Little of the peoples money on important assets that allow the guys and girls at the pointy end to do their job more effectively.

Understand from this rumour network ( and others) current UK throw-wing assets are getting rather tired.

Is the reluctance of some to spend the money simply because there not built in UK?

Link;

http://www.defence.gov.au/media/down...218b/index.htm
Flyingblind is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2007, 02:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 57
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great news but IOC in 2011? Blimey ....

It ain't your grandfather's P-51, is it? Still, I guess it will still beat the F-35 into the squadrons.
Like This - Do That is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2007, 03:41
  #3 (permalink)  
Music Quizmeister
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Can'tberra, ACT Australia
Age: 67
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See the last pic? An ex-RN guy recruited laterally is one of the instructor pilots.

IOC of 2011 does sound a bit late. Perhaps the news people got it wrong, and that's full delivery or inital Squadron fully raised...........
scran is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2007, 04:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GAFA - East
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool New Gear

And a new Tiger FFMS (Full Flight & Mission Simulator - Sim hours logged as aircraft hours);

http://www.defence.gov.au/media/down...213a/index.htm
BentStick is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2007, 06:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
operational capability of 2011

As this surely means all aircraft on the flightline and most crews Combat Ready on type, ie the fleet ready for war, 2011 is quite resonable.

It is a great pity that UKplc are not doing the same.
Tiger_mate is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2007, 07:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Umm, where did I put the Garmin?
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given our procurement woes, I'd rather we just bought some shiney G model Wokkas. God alone knows what QinetiQ would do if turned loose on some UK NH-90s!
Rakshasa is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2007, 10:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 322
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah, good thinking... cos a Wokka will EASILY fit into the landing spaces that a small helicopter like the puma does
Aynayda Pizaqvick is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2007, 14:31
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Umm, where did I put the Garmin?
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oooohh, get her!

That wasn't a dig at the Puma, more a comment that if we could afford more lift let's get the most lift for our money.
Rakshasa is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2007, 17:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 322
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have nothing to do with the Puma so didn’t take it personally. I am just sick of all the people that think all our SH lift problems can be resolved by purchasing an all Chinook superfleet. Yes it is a brilliant aircraft and one we could scarcely do without, but we need fleets that complement each other.
And if you are after
the most lift for our money
then surely we should purchase about 50 Hips!!!
Aynayda Pizaqvick is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2007, 20:46
  #10 (permalink)  
Music Quizmeister
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Can'tberra, ACT Australia
Age: 67
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tiger_mate,

What you describe is FULL Operational Capability.


Initial Operational Capability (when I worked in an area that was related to this project) was being discussed. The general feeling at the time was Initial capability should be defined as some part of the force to the standard you describe (crews trained, ready for war etc), be that the capability to put a standard "block" (say - 4 birds onto the LPA) ready to do "operational" stuff was available.......................
scran is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2007, 22:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,074
Received 187 Likes on 71 Posts
then surely we should purchase about 50 Hips!!!
Put the bottle down mate, I think youve had enough!

I agree that the wokka isnt the answer to every question, and the Puma is proving that in the Gulf. But Hips?

Theres a reason they are cheap mate!
minigundiplomat is online now  
Old 20th Dec 2007, 00:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Uk
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Is the reluctance of some to spend the money simply because there not built in UK?"

now that westlands is Owned by Agusta thats solveable, at a price

its because he regards all defence spending as a waste of money
knowitall is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2007, 03:27
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Umm, where did I put the Garmin?
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have nothing to do with the Puma so didn’t take it personally. I am just sick of all the people that think all our SH lift problems can be resolved by purchasing an all Chinook superfleet. Yes it is a brilliant aircraft and one we could scarcely do without, but we need fleets that complement each other.
And I don't disagree with you. But we're now talking about a wider issue than I was in my original comment.

I'd wouldn't say no if the treasury loosened the purse strings to buy some but I know even if they did, we'd be talking penny numbers and another asset tying down crews for conversion and training. I doubt they'd pull the plug on Puma - or if they did, replace them frame for frame.

Also, we'd be looking probably at a year or two before we'd have a useful deployable force. That's not gonna help the SH force in the short term as much as some more cabs we already operate would.

Well, that was my thinking anyway.

And if you are after
the most lift for our money
then surely we should purchase about 50 Hips!!!
I wouldn't be against it if they were new and built to western standards but by then they wouldn't be all that cheap either.
Rakshasa is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2007, 16:39
  #14 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't be against it if they were new and built to western standards but by then they wouldn't be all that cheap either.
And assuming that nice Mr Putin didn't have some kind of kill-switch added in somewhere...
MarkD is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.