Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Shuttle practise at RAF Fairford

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Shuttle practise at RAF Fairford

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 13:31
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Swindon, Wilts,UK
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Tinternets a wonderful thing!
According to a NASA report there are only four mobile cranes in America that have the lifting capacity at the required reach to do this.

Shuttle lift
Windy Militant is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 14:12
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why bother? I say we impound it under health and safety regs, strip it and flog the bits back a piece at a time.........

ohhh , a black omega has just pulled up.
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 14:14
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If Brize ATC are anything like they used to be, they'd tell it to hold outside the ATZ for 10 mins before allowing it in. They never did ever seem to be able to handle more than 1 a/c at a time.
WASALOADIE is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 18:46
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well then, let the Shuttle crews thank God they aren't diverting to Upper Heyford!
Agaricus bisporus is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 20:40
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: F8 and Be There
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't/isn't Finningley a relief landing ground for the shuttle too?
I heard that Elvington was the diversion ground in this part of the world, cos it's got stacks of runway...

Have I been told a load of b*llocks?

MS
Max Shutterspeed is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 01:58
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Brick Profile

With the high ROD, and 'glide' profile you might find they actually enter UK airspace at the Fairford airfield ILS Outer Marker (At Flight Level a Gigillian) for a touchdown 10 miles later. Henct the 'advisory' call to tower on Guard. Note that it glides at something like M - 6 reducing to M 0.5 (300 IAS or so at touchdown). Also note that the ILS (if fitted) will not be suitable for the VV strrp G/S said 'Brick' flies. Me thinks that the recovery effort after the fact is a relatively 'minor' logistical problem once the crew and hull is safe - that is when you compare it to the 'oh Fu**c!' factor after launch.
L J R is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 03:11
  #27 (permalink)  
Music Quizmeister
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Can'tberra, ACT Australia
Age: 67
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is also an "emergency" strip in Oz.


Actually two I think.


I seem to remember the other issue is the toxic "stuff" the thing emits after said emergency landing - so I'm not sure if you would ever WANT it to turn up
scran is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 05:09
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That wouild be hydrozene (sp?) - The stuff in F-16's when they do the flame out approach.

Have a look at launch control and see the 'Glide Envelopes' around the big picture world map. Gives you a idea where it could on after a thrust loss.
L J R is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 07:21
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Not far enough south of Cambridge
Age: 80
Posts: 208
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
They carted a shuttle into Stansted on the back of a Jumbo in the early 80's(?) as a test for the same 'long runway' reasons.

Cliver
cliver029 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 08:17
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Swindon, Wilts,UK
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Twas Enterprise, the glide test article on it's way to (or coming back from) Paris for the airshow. It also made an appearance at Fairford. So it's a fairly safe bet that if they can get it on the Jumbo (making sure that the black side's down) they can get it out of there.
Windy Militant is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 08:39
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Luberon
Age: 72
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Has anyone else actually seen the Shuttle while in flight? I remember seeing one of them pass over Southern Fife, after launch, in the mid eighties. The met and sun conditions were perfect and there were two images visible, one the shuttle itself and the second was its shadow printed on the atmosphere as it raced across the sky. The press had mentioned that it may be visible that day so there were a few of us watching for it.
I doubt Leuchars would have made a suitable diversion option, but the yanks do enjoy a game of golf.
sitigeltfel is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 08:59
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: At piece.
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The max weight of the orbiter in an emergency landing is 240K lbs/120 tons. Loads of wheeled cranes capable of lifting it. but they'd fly in and assemble their lifting derrick to do the job and then position the 747 underneath it.
Who is 'lifting Derek'?
OCCWMF is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 10:58
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 59°45'36N 10°27'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hydrozene (sp?)
Hydrazine (N2H4), and yes very nasty indeed.
The RFFS really hate the stuff.
M609 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 11:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the alleged Shuttle emergency strips in OZ is RAAF Darwin.

It has a loooooong runway, but not as long as it used to be.

I think it's about 11,000ft now, but it used to be as long as that waste of desert known as Doha International - summat like 15,000ft.
harrogate is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 11:11
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hunched over a keyboard
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Agaricus bisporus
and a JCB or two to fill up the hole in Oxfordshire afterwards.
Or even Gloucestershire!
moggiee is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 12:27
  #36 (permalink)  
Buttonpusher
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bloody Hell
Age: 65
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
GO AWAY SHUTTLE you can't land here.......
FLCH is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 12:43
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to NASA the orbiter is quote:- "About the size of a DC-9 jetliner, a Space Shuttle orbiter does not require such a large runway for landing." unquote.

Fairford is 10,000ft with i think 1000ft of overun if needed (someone can correct if wrong). The Orbiter touches down at around 216-226mph and with chute deployed it can make it, should imagine on Fairfords runway without any problem at all.

I think the only limiting factor for the choice of runways is that the B-747 needs much more to take off than usual, with a DC9 sized load on its back...

Plus the B-747 needs just as capable airfields along the route. (Keflavik, Lajes etc)

It uses so much fuel on the route home from Edwards and travels much more slowly that it needs to touch down again at Ellington Field, Houston before taking off again routing to Florida.

I should imagine the route home from Europe would take atleast two days.
Razor61 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 13:40
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Norfolk U.K.
Age: 68
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I watched some of the satellite feeds of the mission and there was a "pilots eye view" of the final approach - one hell of a steep descent!! I seem to remember reading that NASA had to modify a Gulfstream? to operate with in-flight thrust reversers to give the crew some realistic training...The actual landing was pretty damn good, and the roll out doesn't seem particularly long.
All the ground crew who first approach the shuttle when it has stopped are wearing full suits and breathing apparatus, which tallies with the comments about "nasties" being given off.
The Flying Pram is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 14:02
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'Nasties' include:

Hydrazine - 1,085 pounds. Shuttle APU's.
Monomethylhydrazine - 10,800 pounds. Fuel for RCS/OMS.
Nitrogen Tetroxide - 17,500 pounds. Oxidizer for RCS/OMS.
Refrigerant 21 - 59.7 pounds. For closed-loop heat transport.
Liquid Ammonia - 110 pounds. Coolant in the active thermal control subsystem.

NASA website states that the minimun runway length required at abort site is 7500ft. Fine weather being preferable.

There has been only one known abort (STS 51-F). One main engine shut down about half way through ascent. Abort to Orbit was selected, and the mission continued.

And just for good measure: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwfsFtpACFw
Focks 2 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 14:13
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This website:- http://www.wstf.nasa.gov/WSSH/Default.htm
Shows pictures of the Gulfstreams rate of descent and also the Space Shuttle Columbia landing at the White Sands Space Harbor in 1982, where the pilots conduct the Gulfstream landing training.
Razor61 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.