Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Chance to comment....

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Chance to comment....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Nov 2007, 09:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chance to comment....

....on planned changes to air traffic services. It looks as though RIS, RAS and FIS will be no more. More details on CAA site below:

http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=1496

Thoughts?

RC
right chopper is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 11:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahh but Mike, the FAS (F£ck All Service) for you will remain mate!!

When are you getting to bring that French Rocket into LCY?
AlanM is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 15:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,821
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
The only significant difference to most folk will be that 'Deconfliction' will be available under VFR&IFR, whereas currentIy RAS is only available under IFR. I wrote the following to the CAA:


I have the following comments to make in response to your consultation document:
1. 'Basic' Service:
I agree with your proposals and with the title.
2. 'Traffic' Service:
The title is too vague. It does not indicate whether pilots in receipt of such a service will be given purely information (cf. RIS), advisory headings to resolve conflict (cf. RAS) or mandatory instructions. Although pilot education will serve to reduce such confusion, it would still be inherent in the ambiguous title. Hence I recommend that this level of service should be re-titled Traffic Information Service, as that would more clearly describe the level of service. TIS should, however, be as you describe for 'Traffic' service in your document.
3. 'Deconfliction' Service:
  • The title is cumbersome and fails to indicate the level of service. Moreover, it will cause a deal of confusion to those pilot who currently under a RIS (or even a 'FRIS') are requested to amend their headings 'for deconfliction purposes'. To overcome these issues, I recommend that the service is re-titled Traffic Advisory Service as that would more clearly describe the level of service.
  • Undoubtedly the provision of TAS ('deconfliction') to pilots flying under VFR will increase controller workload, particularly when the service is provided against unknown or non-squawking traffic. Under no circumstances must the provision of such a service to VFR pilots be taken as a 'foot in the door' or trade-off for mandating the carriage of Mode S transponders outside Class A-C airspace.
BEagle is online now  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 16:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Going deeper underground
Age: 55
Posts: 332
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey guys. I have come up with this fab round thing that is really useful for moving stuff with. I am going to call it a 'wheel'! PM me if you want more details on how this 'wheel' is going to change the world.
orgASMic is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.