Defence Minister goes racing.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
Age: 38
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Defence Minister goes racing.
Just saw this pop up on BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7082833.stm
Will this have any impact on current procurement plans (or plans to renege on our various current procurement contracts)? Thoughts? Makes you wonder just how much time has been spent on questions like tyre selection rather than the future of defence .
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7082833.stm
Lord Drayson's job as defence procurement minister job (sic) has gone, on a permanent and paid basis, to Baroness Ann Taylor.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colditz young offenders centre
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4446978.stm
Maybe best to let him go racing then...
Paul Drayson is the Labour Party's leading businessman in government.
He was made a lord and then the UK defence procurement minister after giving New Labour more than £1m.
In 2004 he was the party's largest individual donor. The Money Programme can reveal that he also ran a company which sold faulty TB vaccines and kept quiet about it for 21 months, risking the health of thousands of people.
In 2004 he was the party's largest individual donor. The Money Programme can reveal that he also ran a company which sold faulty TB vaccines and kept quiet about it for 21 months, risking the health of thousands of people.
Last edited by Jetex Jim; 7th Nov 2007 at 17:44.
He's not the Defence Procurement Minister - it was renamed Defence Equipment & Support and elevated to Minister of State status. (I think this was why Broon could "justify" Broon Mk2 getting the Scotland brief - he had an extra Minister of State. Could be wrong).
One could look at this two ways.
As the MoD rarely buy kit now and don't support it properly, what is there for him to do?
Following "his" Defence Industrial Strategy and DSTL (sorry, Defence) Technology Strategy (i.e. formalising handouts to BAeS, Thales and QinetiQ) it's a case of job done.
Interesting timing, what with the ****storm that may hit MoD when various BoI reports are released.
One could look at this two ways.
As the MoD rarely buy kit now and don't support it properly, what is there for him to do?
Following "his" Defence Industrial Strategy and DSTL (sorry, Defence) Technology Strategy (i.e. formalising handouts to BAeS, Thales and QinetiQ) it's a case of job done.
Interesting timing, what with the ****storm that may hit MoD when various BoI reports are released.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Somerset
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Le Mans?
It is worthy of note that he is the only VVIP I ever saw drive himself to Abbey Wood, when most other 2*'s plus had cars and drivers.
The fact that he used to roll up in his own Aston DB9 may have been the reason though....
The fact that he used to roll up in his own Aston DB9 may have been the reason though....
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ball gazing
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A number of special circumstances have now presented me with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to take my racing to the next level
Oh, yeah, sorry...I'll just take myself off and have a word with myself.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Anywhere there's ships and aircraft available
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you think this is the only reason for him to resign then you are mistaken.
Some of the PR08 measures will hurt DE&S across the board, he is jumping to avoid it.
Si
Some of the PR08 measures will hurt DE&S across the board, he is jumping to avoid it.
Si
(a bear of little brain)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 51 10 03.70N 2 58 37.15W
Age: 75
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah but.
Lord Drayson, minister, acting, UNPAID. Has resigned. To be replaced by Baroness Ann Taylor, who will be paid for the job.
So who will cost more? (Time will tell who is more competent).
Lord Drayson, minister, acting, UNPAID. Has resigned. To be replaced by Baroness Ann Taylor, who will be paid for the job.
So who will cost more? (Time will tell who is more competent).
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Uk
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
right so Drayson Buggers off to race cars and David Miliband misses a long planned state visit to adopt a kid................Good luck to them
............its not like there's a war on!
............its not like there's a war on!
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Shefford, Beds, UK
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jump or push?
Intersceptic
Quote:
Will this have any impact on current procurement plans (or plans to renege on our various current procurement contracts)? Thoughts?
As I understand it (and I'm willing to be corrected) the MOD have been told to 'save' 40% of this year's STP funding, so, has he jumped or was he pushed?
Either way we're still scraping around for the basics.
Quote:
Will this have any impact on current procurement plans (or plans to renege on our various current procurement contracts)? Thoughts?
As I understand it (and I'm willing to be corrected) the MOD have been told to 'save' 40% of this year's STP funding, so, has he jumped or was he pushed?
Either way we're still scraping around for the basics.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well here's a thought;
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/mai...9/cnmod129.xml
Thread Drift Warning: AMBER
Interestingly, the additional armour needed by FRES to make it IED survivable has now made it overweight for transport by Herc. It would now need an A400M; http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle2963344.ece
MoD delay to defence deal sheds light on why minister quit.
The Ministry of Defence is to delay a decision on a multi-billion pound contract for a new generation of armoured vehicles after Treasury pressure to drive down the price.
An announcement of the MoD's preferred supplier for the contract, Future Rapid Effect System (FRES), was to be made tomorrow and the move to extend the tender process sheds more light on reasons why defence procurement minister Lord Drayson resigned earlier this month.
FRES will be the MoD's largest contract, with the original plan to order about 3,000 vehicles worth £10bn over 10 years. The deal's total value, including maintenance and support, would be up to £60bn over the lifetime of the programme. But the Treasury wants the MoD to look again at the bids, and there is talk within the Ministry that the final contract may be for only 700 to 1,500 vehicles.
Within the defence industry, the long-delayed FRES had become a byword for the MoD's mishandling of big arms procurements.But in May Lord Drayson pledged in an interview with The Daily Telegraph that a decision on the winning bidder would be made by the end of November. "That is the first time that this department has said a decision will be made at a definite time," Lord Drayson promised. "The department has never done that before. I will keep the department to that. I learned as chief executive of a public company that it was important to do what you say."
He added: "Fres is a project that was going round in circles; without clarity and without drive. The department allowed that to happen... It should not have happened."
Lord Drayson resigned on November 7, saying he wanted to fulfil a dream of racing in the Le Mans championship. But there has been intense speculation of a bust-up with his boss, the Defence Secretary Des Browne, and also the Treasury.
Lord Drayson said in May that getting Fres signed would be a good test of the MoD's Defence Industrial Strategy (DIS), a plan drawn up to help government and industry work in partnership rather than competition.
An updated DIS was to be announced this month, but that has also been delayed.
The Ministry of Defence is to delay a decision on a multi-billion pound contract for a new generation of armoured vehicles after Treasury pressure to drive down the price.
An announcement of the MoD's preferred supplier for the contract, Future Rapid Effect System (FRES), was to be made tomorrow and the move to extend the tender process sheds more light on reasons why defence procurement minister Lord Drayson resigned earlier this month.
FRES will be the MoD's largest contract, with the original plan to order about 3,000 vehicles worth £10bn over 10 years. The deal's total value, including maintenance and support, would be up to £60bn over the lifetime of the programme. But the Treasury wants the MoD to look again at the bids, and there is talk within the Ministry that the final contract may be for only 700 to 1,500 vehicles.
Within the defence industry, the long-delayed FRES had become a byword for the MoD's mishandling of big arms procurements.But in May Lord Drayson pledged in an interview with The Daily Telegraph that a decision on the winning bidder would be made by the end of November. "That is the first time that this department has said a decision will be made at a definite time," Lord Drayson promised. "The department has never done that before. I will keep the department to that. I learned as chief executive of a public company that it was important to do what you say."
He added: "Fres is a project that was going round in circles; without clarity and without drive. The department allowed that to happen... It should not have happened."
Lord Drayson resigned on November 7, saying he wanted to fulfil a dream of racing in the Le Mans championship. But there has been intense speculation of a bust-up with his boss, the Defence Secretary Des Browne, and also the Treasury.
Lord Drayson said in May that getting Fres signed would be a good test of the MoD's Defence Industrial Strategy (DIS), a plan drawn up to help government and industry work in partnership rather than competition.
An updated DIS was to be announced this month, but that has also been delayed.
Thread Drift Warning: AMBER
Interestingly, the additional armour needed by FRES to make it IED survivable has now made it overweight for transport by Herc. It would now need an A400M; http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle2963344.ece
I'm afraid the Times report on FRES is a rehash of the House of Commons Defence Committee report of 21st Feb 2007. Noting that FRES supersedes TRACER and MRAV, the HoCDC said;
A very good question, which one hopes the committee asks again...............
One assumes the 2007 ISD for Mob, Med, Cmnd and R&R will not now be met.
The TRACER and MRAV programmes cost a total of £188M (before cancellation). The MoD asserts that the output from these programmes has informed work on FRES, but it is not clear how. The MoD should explain how the work carried out on TRACER and MRAV has contributed to FRES".
A very good question, which one hopes the committee asks again...............
One assumes the 2007 ISD for Mob, Med, Cmnd and R&R will not now be met.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: shrewsbury
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Article in the Torygraph this morning states that the new vehicles for the army will not be able to be deployed on the battlefield because they do not comply with the latest EU emission regulations.
Do they mean lead emissions?
Do they mean lead emissions?
I see that Lord Drayson is on his way back to the MoD after Brown’s second wave of musical chairs. Does this mean I can have his place at Le-Mans this coming weekend?
Gordon Brown's reshuffle - full list of appointed ministers - Telegraph
Gordon Brown's reshuffle - full list of appointed ministers - Telegraph