Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Concordes ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th October 2007 | 18:46
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: South of Penge
I don't think that it is necessarily totally an urban legend.
The story of the Duxford Concorde having the modified fuselage frames ties in well with the "Brit " Concorde 002 at Yeovilton allegedy having a similar configuration under the skin -possibly even so far as including the sway brace hardpoints. The "French" prototypes it seems did not have this.
The story could now be fairly easily verified or disproved I would have thought.
RETDPI is offline  
Reply
Old 25th October 2007 | 18:54
  #42 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 24
From: New Zealand
At least one problem would seem to be, where to put any weapons? The Blue Steel shown in the pictures was big & heavy (let alone 3 of them!). The space around the CG in a Concorde is all taken up by wheel bays and engines. While no expert I'd have thought that trim problems in releasing heavy stores so far ahead of CG as shown in the picture would have been insuperable.
mike1964 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2007 | 11:19
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: East Midlands
what a brilliant thread !!

Makes you wonder what lies under the FOI act doesn't it?
225Turbo is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2007 | 12:54
  #44 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,682
Likes: 63
From: Far West Wessex
Well...
Maybe that was where all the time and money went. Time for the history anoraks to see whether 01 or 202 disappeared for a while in the 1970s, doing weapons release and tests of an astro-inertial nav fit someplace in Nevada.
LowObservable is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2007 | 16:13
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: west midlands
Continuous Concord...

How about MORALE BOOSTER...?
Or multi-student fast-jet trainer. Give Wales a break, run it around the Home Counties, Monday to Friday.
I know the dreadful realities of life too well, but we need to dream sometimes. Those who dreamed of getting a Vulcan up again managed it, four Olympus too, but I think that's a dream too far for Concord- too much technology. The Vulcan's a Meccano set compared to Concord.
B50.
blandford50 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2007 | 17:56
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: a galaxy far, far,away...
I believe the French have kept one airworthy just in case. Can't recall the museum it's in but ex-Conc engineers have kept up with the work.
aluminium persuader is offline  
Reply
Old 28th August 2023 | 03:51
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 3
Likes: 1
From: Thailand
My father was a QFI and was last stationed at Upavon. He retired from the RAF voluntarily in 1965, age 44 to go on to work as an instructor for Airwork Services and then BAC in Saudi. When he took me to see the Concorde at Yeovilton, he told me he had been involved in some of the radar work on that aircraft (002 I think?) - sorry to open up such an old thread, but does this ring a bell with anyone?

He joined up in 1939 at age 18 and after much flying was part of the RAF mission to Germany in 1958 to teach Luftwaffe pilots to fly jets. His name was Arthur "John" Hubbard.

Anyone who might have known him, please reply. I'd give out his service number, but I'm not sure if that's de rigeur.

Thank you all!

Last edited by aZooZa; 29th August 2023 at 01:50. Reason: Last station: Upavon, not Ouston
aZooZa is offline  
Reply
Old 28th August 2023 | 23:19
  #48 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,536
Likes: 295
From: The Alps
From RAF Yearbook 1971



and somewhere else, depiction of it carrying Blue steel or skybolt



cheers
chopper2004 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2023 | 02:00
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 3
Likes: 1
From: Thailand
Thank you!
aZooZa is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2023 | 07:09
  #50 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,247
Likes: 1,658
From: Ferrara
the article is interesting - as ever any mention of financial restraints are missing - and one might also muse on an industry that seemed incapable of producing an exportable aircraft after the Canberra and the Hunter and maybe the Harrier
Asturias56 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2023 | 08:48
  #51 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 129
From: Here
Originally Posted by Asturias56
the article is interesting - as ever any mention of financial restraints are missing - and one might also muse on an industry that seemed incapable of producing an exportable aircraft after the Canberra and the Hunter and maybe the Harrier
Hawk?



Davef68 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2023 | 11:34
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 276
From: GMT
Originally Posted by Contacttower
To be fair the Tristar and the VC10 must be among the safest airliners ever built.
To be fair, in the case of the VC10 that was probably attributable to the fact it was U/S most of the time.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2023 | 12:30
  #53 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 160
From: Next to Ross and Demelza
Originally Posted by Davef68
Hawk?
Far more exportable than the Harrier.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2023 | 12:49
  #54 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,247
Likes: 1,658
From: Ferrara
Originally Posted by Davef68
Hawk?
designed over 50 years ago....................
Asturias56 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2023 | 14:02
  #55 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 358
Likes: 74
From: Cayley's County - Yorkshire
Originally Posted by Asturias56
designed over 50 years ago....................
But continuously developed over that time, over 1000 sold, the last one delivered just a year ago.
In terms of design royalty payments, although they decreased as the design evolved from the original TMk1, supposedly the second most profitable export programme ever across all sectors.
CAEBr is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2023 | 15:08
  #56 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 208
From: SW England
aZooZa, my Dad was also at Upavon in 1965 having gone from spec-rec for promotion to Wg Cdr to redundancy in the latest round of defence cuts within a matter of months. His last flying tour as an A1 instructor had been 2i/c Transport Command Examining Unit at Benson, after which he did the Russian interpreter's course at Tangmere. Long story involving air crash in Russia killing many military and air attaches meant him dipping out on a diplo tour in Moscow, so he finished his operational time as Ops O for a SIGINT Wing at Butzweilerhof near Cologne. Sadly, he departed the fix 2 years ago so am unable to find out if he knew your Dad; HQ 38 Gp did seem to be a clearing-house for people departing the service.

If chopper2004 hadn't already done so, I'd have uploaded the Arthur Gibson black-and-white pic from the Yearbook.
Thud_and_Blunder is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2023 | 16:40
  #57 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,247
Likes: 1,658
From: Ferrara
Its not just the aircraft - we continually build & buy military equipment of all types which rarely sells - tanks? destroyers?..................

tho they do seem to be selling the plans for the T26 frigate
Asturias56 is offline  
Reply
Old 30th August 2023 | 10:15
  #58 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 3,395
Likes: 327
From: near an aeroplane
Originally Posted by minigundiplomat
To be fair, in the case of the VC10 that was probably attributable to the fact it was U/S most of the time.
Which variant and period are you talking about? It served BOAC/BA and several other operators for several years without any serious safety issues.
Jhieminga is offline  
Reply
Old 30th August 2023 | 12:05
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 276
From: GMT
Originally Posted by Jhieminga
Which variant and period are you talking about? It served BOAC/BA and several other operators for several years without any serious safety issues.
The RAF variant (This is the Military Aviation Forum, not the 1950's Airliner Nostalgia Forum) that so often failed to materialise at the end of a deployment.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Reply
Old 30th August 2023 | 12:19
  #60 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,141
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
Originally Posted by minigundiplomat
To be fair, in the case of the VC10 that was probably attributable to the fact it was U/S most of the time.
We very rarely had them unavailable in my time. Ther main problem we had was the stupid running rules that messed up getting them sorted at night.
NutLoose is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.