Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Culdrose for QRA

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Culdrose for QRA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Oct 2007, 14:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Culdrose for QRA

On local TV News this morning, they had a stint showing Culdrose and stating that it will now serve as a front line station "against terrorism" by operating QRA aircraft or in her terms, "Rapid Reaction Fighter Aircraft".

Surely even though St Mawgan will soon fall into Civil hands it would be better for them to be based there with the longer runway and the southern dispersal site?

Last edited by Razor61; 20th Oct 2007 at 14:50.
Razor61 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 14:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to agree with you.... I could never use the words, Culdrose and Quick reaction in the same sentence.
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 15:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
vvha

I think the Sqn with the same number as your posts might take exception to that one.



TOG
Toxteth O'Grady is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 15:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
T O'G - the killer with that one is that as soon as he replies, it will be a different squadron
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 15:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
I think the Sqn with the same number as your posts might take exception to that one.
Not very relevant to modern operations though as they will hardly be carrying out the task themselves.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 15:46
  #6 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
More info here.

Perhaps a new NAS would be more appropriate
Navaleye is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 16:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's an absolute farce. I notice that the newspaper didn't bother to raise the question as to why the MoD was abandoning a huge, well-equipped airfield and confining it's QRA activities to a tiny helicopter base with a piddling 6,000 foot runway... but then this would annoy the local politicians who effectively drove the MoD away after failing to persuade them to maintain an empty airfield so that they could run an airport for free.

I really don't know who is more stupid - the MoD for letting such a valuable asset go, or the local bigwigs for thinking the MoD would pay for their airport, but play with their RAF planes nice and quietly so as not to upset anyone.

Still, the whole concept borders on complete absurdity. I can't quite grasp the concept of "Quick" Reaction Alert if the fighter detachment requires a few days of advance warning to get over there. Presumably the terrorists will be kind enough as to advise the RAF of their intentions? Oh well, it'll make a nice photo-shoot for the media at some stage I guess - the Daily Mail readers will be able to sleep happy in their beds
Tim McLelland is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 16:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,812
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Why not a (regenerated) Sea Jet or two from RNSFDO? As mentioned on the Sea Jet thread.

Or FRADU Hawks with Sidewinder?

Both of these are less than logical suggestions I know, but I had to get the link in somehow. Of course, the Typhoon radar was developed from the SHAR FA2's Blue Vixen.

How is the RAF expected to do more QRA with less fighter aircraft than just a few years ago?
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 16:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Overseas
Posts: 446
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
The RAF will not be doing any more QRA than it is at present. This is a non-story. Culdrose will just be taking over the job that Mawgan had, but never used. We are not deploying jets there to man QRA, but it is there if we ever need it.
LateArmLive is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 21:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Still on the beach (but this one's cold).
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new wonder jet does not need 6000 of runway, it could safely operate with much less. Culdrose will do just fine.
Mach the Knife is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 21:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
er... yeah, but that's slightly missing the point, isn't it?!
Tim McLelland is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 21:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 458
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Waiting for it....

"MOD announces multi-billion pound runway extension and building project at Cornish Navy airfield for RAF jets"
Jobza Guddun is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 22:21
  #13 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No, I'm sure common sense will prevail here.












Then they'll re-open Chivenor.
 
Old 21st Oct 2007, 18:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Isnt the main threat axis on the Circle Line at the moment ?
peterperfect is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2007, 19:35
  #15 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, in that case, Q to Northolt
 
Old 21st Oct 2007, 19:59
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London FIR
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, in that case, Q to Northolt
over 5500' of pavement, and a tower thats almost H24 anyways, why not....


.... oh thats right, the taxiways are all breaking up or are already unfit for aircraft ops, so they'd never get to the runway in the first place!

Screw runway extensions lets maintain the surfaces we already have first

Sorry, the soapbox has been put away
Monkey Madness is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2007, 08:55
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's all a ploy to let the cornish think they willl still have mil investment. its never going to happen and my beloved home will disappear up its own 4rsehole driven by TV chefs and Nimby's moaning aboout the sound of overtime
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2007, 18:56
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: RAF Lincolnshire
Age: 24
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MinAF Statement on Culdrose

Airfield Review (Tertiary Airfield Support)

The Minister for the Armed Forces (Mr. Bob Ainsworth): On 18 July 2002, Official Report, columns 460-464, my right hon. Friend, the Member for Ashfield (Mr Hoon) the then Secretary of State for Defence, announced the publication of a new chapter to the 1998 Strategic Defence Review (SDR) that was designed to ensure that our defence policies, capabilities and force structures matched the challenges that the new terrorist threats posed.

Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) comprises: armed Tornado F3 and Typhoon aircraft held at ground readiness for immediate take-off; the Air Surveillance and Control System to provide warning and command and control of the fighter aircraft; and tanker aircraft also held at high ground readiness. QRA fulfils two concurrent functions. Firstly, it meets the United Kingdom's responsibility within NATO to provide air policing of agreed member airspace. Secondly, under UK national control, QRA provides an airborne contribution to countering threats against the UK by terrorist organisations or individuals. The SDR New Chapter confirmed that airfields across the UK—RAF Marham, RAF St Mawgan and RNAS Yeovilton—would be able to support QRA aircraft when needed, in addition to the bases from which the QRA aircraft usually operate.

Following the decision to dispose of the airfield at RAF St Mawgan, we have reviewed the short term tertiary airfields that support quick reaction alert aircraft and decided that MOD Boscombe Down and RNAS Culdrose will now be enabled by Spring 2008 to cover any potential threats to the south and south-western airspaces. In the interim, RAF St Mawgan will continue to be utilised as necessary to support short term QRA aircraft. RAF Marham will continue to be maintained as a tertiary QRA airfield. This support is in addition to the bases that are already able to operate such aircraft and will give us enhanced flexibility in our air defence arrangements.
AonP is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.