Typhoon going to the Saudis...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Typhoon going to the Saudis...
... or is it?
I know our politicians wouldn't know a Hawk from a Merlin, but have BAe pulled off the biggest scam in military history...
http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/index.cfm...F13758FFC52E42
I know our politicians wouldn't know a Hawk from a Merlin, but have BAe pulled off the biggest scam in military history...
http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/index.cfm...F13758FFC52E42
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ssshhh... if you keep schtum, we may get to keep out tranche 3 AND still get JSF, as well as getting £18bn for our old GR4s.
This is innovative procurement.
Gordon - I take it all back.
Genius!
This is innovative procurement.
Gordon - I take it all back.
Genius!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South of Penge
Age: 74
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the article shown on Harrogate's perceptive fron page
"........there will be a flypast over the city of Cardiff on Sunday 30th September.
The formation will comprise 2 Harrier aircraft of Joint Force Harrier drawn from No.20 Squadron RAF Cottesmore, and will be flown by a RN Officer and a RAF Officer. "
I.e front page news: RAF aircrew participating in 50% of a two ship pass.
And we get accused of taking the p*ss.
"........there will be a flypast over the city of Cardiff on Sunday 30th September.
The formation will comprise 2 Harrier aircraft of Joint Force Harrier drawn from No.20 Squadron RAF Cottesmore, and will be flown by a RN Officer and a RAF Officer. "
I.e front page news: RAF aircrew participating in 50% of a two ship pass.
And we get accused of taking the p*ss.
REDTPI - well if it had been a 100% RAF effort, it'd have meant that JFH was only commemorating the efforts of 1 Sqn and the RAF exchange chaps on the SHAR in 1982. 50-50 seems a fair split (since you can't have 30% of an RAF pilot...)
I'm surprised there isn't a random picture of a VC10 accompanying the story, though. RAF News appear to be letting standards slip.
I'm surprised there isn't a random picture of a VC10 accompanying the story, though. RAF News appear to be letting standards slip.