B52 over America with 6 Nuclear War heads ** a Mistake **
Well, absolutely, I'm sure heads will roll.
The question it begs to me is why there'd ever be any need to load them on an aircraft in the first place. I presume there's dummy versions to train with - unless it's just the easiest, safest way to transport them, or something like that. But even then, why move them around unnecessarily - and why would it be necessary to move them?
Phil
The question it begs to me is why there'd ever be any need to load them on an aircraft in the first place. I presume there's dummy versions to train with - unless it's just the easiest, safest way to transport them, or something like that. But even then, why move them around unnecessarily - and why would it be necessary to move them?
Phil
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
Makes all those White House press releases about "Letting some Middle East madmen loose with nuclear weapons they have no control over" seem somewhat prophetic, when Leroy and Cletus up at Minot AFB seem to have been able to undermine 60 years of Nuclear Safeguard Protocols, in between Gopher hunting and and chewin' tobacco.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
The question it begs to me is why there'd ever be any need to load them on an aircraft in the first place.
The warheads should have been removed at Minot before the missiles were loaded. But they weren't. Which is why 70 people have been sacked and/or decertified from being allowed access to nuclear weapons handling in future.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Close to the Arctic Circle
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nuke-Related Sackings
Which is why 70 people have been sacked and/or decertified from being allowed access to nuclear weapons handling in future.
?
> The warheads should have been removed at Minot before the missiles were
> loaded. But they weren't.
Right. That, to me, is the kicker. That turns it from a "what are you, blind?" into a slightly more understandable mistake.
Still, oops, though!
Phil
> loaded. But they weren't.
Right. That, to me, is the kicker. That turns it from a "what are you, blind?" into a slightly more understandable mistake.
Still, oops, though!
Phil
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mike, I think the fact that the Nuclear Weapon carriage system worked as advertised means that NOTHING was going to happen.
Remember Rule Two of internet forums applies.
Remember Rule Two of internet forums applies.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When iiiiiiii was a lad, before i started flying, i worked on strike load teams for about 3 years loading nukes onto Buccs and Tornados. The protocols we had in place were unbelievable, and we had to rehearse and rehearse. At any one time, somebody had legal ownership of the weapons. Either the SNCO from the dump, the police, the SNCO of the load team or the Captain of the aircraft. Ownership of the weapon was a very serious business and the 'handover' was a formal script bound procedure lasting about 5 mins, which had to be word perfect (there must be some Tornado bods on here from the 80's who remember this). The weapon went nowhere without the 'owners' consent (because his b******s were on the line. My understanding of the US system was it was equally as stringent, particularly the guarding. I can understand why the aircraft in question can sit on the pan unguarded (because nobody seemed aware of the payload), but I can't work out how the question of ownership has been bypassed prior to the weapons being loaded. It is a monumental c**k up, and luckily it has happened, as it seems to me this could easily have been reorchestrated, and the US would have ended up with 'Broken Arrow'. I don't think it will happen again somehow!
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Good thing you took such good care of the Tigs2. Weren't at Bruggen were you....
.....Newly declassified documents obtained by New Scientist magazine detail the incidents in which the weapons were dropped or damaged while they were being moved.
The first accident happened on May 2, 1984, at the RAF base at Brüggen, Germany. A nuclear warhead was damaged in transit when its container slid off a wet trailer as it cornered. The warhead, still in its container, rolled on to the tarmac and was dented.
Brüggen base was shut down while the bomb was partially dismantled and scientists were flown from Britain to X-ray the warhead. It was eventually taken back to the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment at Aldermas-ton, Berkshire, to be decommissioned.
An MoD board of inquiry at the time concluded that the accident was caused by the “wrongful act” of failing to attach the bomb container to the trailer. It recommended that six ser-vicemen be disciplined.
The documents, obtained under freedom of information law, show that a regulation requiring bomb containers to be secured when being moved had been routinely ignored since October 1981. Brüggen’s commander at the time, whose name has been removed from the released report, admitted that the breach had become almost a standard operating procedure, despite being an “outrageously high-risk practice”.
.....Newly declassified documents obtained by New Scientist magazine detail the incidents in which the weapons were dropped or damaged while they were being moved.
The first accident happened on May 2, 1984, at the RAF base at Brüggen, Germany. A nuclear warhead was damaged in transit when its container slid off a wet trailer as it cornered. The warhead, still in its container, rolled on to the tarmac and was dented.
Brüggen base was shut down while the bomb was partially dismantled and scientists were flown from Britain to X-ray the warhead. It was eventually taken back to the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment at Aldermas-ton, Berkshire, to be decommissioned.
An MoD board of inquiry at the time concluded that the accident was caused by the “wrongful act” of failing to attach the bomb container to the trailer. It recommended that six ser-vicemen be disciplined.
The documents, obtained under freedom of information law, show that a regulation requiring bomb containers to be secured when being moved had been routinely ignored since October 1981. Brüggen’s commander at the time, whose name has been removed from the released report, admitted that the breach had become almost a standard operating procedure, despite being an “outrageously high-risk practice”.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: U.K
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1961 A B-52 was carrying two 20 megaton nuclear bombs. The plane crashed and five of the six safeties on the bomb failed. The crash occurred near Goldsboro, North Carolina. One bomb was lost.
Suppose all you can say is its a good job it didnt just have 5 safeties!
Suppose all you can say is its a good job it didnt just have 5 safeties!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ORAC
No wasn't at Bruggen
The guys there in the dump had lets say a casual approach to something they did day in day out. As i said in my post, I do not know how they can have bypassed the ownership issue of the weapon.
No wasn't at Bruggen
The guys there in the dump had lets say a casual approach to something they did day in day out. As i said in my post, I do not know how they can have bypassed the ownership issue of the weapon.
Guest
Posts: n/a
He had me at 'hello,' or at least to this point:
That wacky George B. trying to sneak out some 'nukler' firecrackers for his personal use..................
Great journalism; dust off a guy from the 1970s (!) and get his 'insider's' view of how things are done today. Heck, I'd have gone for an interview with Gen Tibbet's on how things were done on the Enola Gay......
But it does not negate the fact that a lot of folks were complacent and that this was easily avoidable, self-inflicted USAF buffoonery.
And may I ask that more recent knowledge about weapons handling be treated a bit more circumspectly in an open forum?
(Ok, I'll be going now...........)
edited to add: "World Socialist Web?" You do get around, sir......
The former officer concludes: “Therefore the only conclusion I can come up with is that this event must have been concocted by someone to appear as an accident. And, because nuclear weapons were said to be involved, orders approving such an event most certainly came from the White House.”
Great journalism; dust off a guy from the 1970s (!) and get his 'insider's' view of how things are done today. Heck, I'd have gone for an interview with Gen Tibbet's on how things were done on the Enola Gay......
But it does not negate the fact that a lot of folks were complacent and that this was easily avoidable, self-inflicted USAF buffoonery.
And may I ask that more recent knowledge about weapons handling be treated a bit more circumspectly in an open forum?
(Ok, I'll be going now...........)
edited to add: "World Socialist Web?" You do get around, sir......
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: On the outside looking in
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
engoal,
The JEngO was on my EOT2. Made the session on "What you did on your first tour" a little more interesting.
As he was obviously never going to go far in the RAF because of it, he left, joined the RN and did somewhat better.
As regards the ones rolling off the trailer, I heard on my UCO course that a smiley face had been painted on the nose. That didn't go down well either.
sw
The JEngO was on my EOT2. Made the session on "What you did on your first tour" a little more interesting.
As he was obviously never going to go far in the RAF because of it, he left, joined the RN and did somewhat better.
As regards the ones rolling off the trailer, I heard on my UCO course that a smiley face had been painted on the nose. That didn't go down well either.
sw
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So after reading all that it was no more than a practice bomb (on steroids) that was released..hell we do that all the time!!
Apart from the administrative failings this was a non event.
Thankfully.
Glad Rag. rule 2 still applies BTW.
Apart from the administrative failings this was a non event.
Thankfully.
Glad Rag. rule 2 still applies BTW.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Apart from the administrative failings this was a non event."
Oh yeah, and if it had crashed somewhere, spilling radiation all over the place, how many fire crews/locals would have been exposed before the paperwork caught up?
I believe that there is also the issue of international treaties about the aerial carriage of nuclear weapons, and while it was inadvertent, it might be that the US just violated one, or more.
JT
Oh yeah, and if it had crashed somewhere, spilling radiation all over the place, how many fire crews/locals would have been exposed before the paperwork caught up?
I believe that there is also the issue of international treaties about the aerial carriage of nuclear weapons, and while it was inadvertent, it might be that the US just violated one, or more.
JT