Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Chavez Vows Revenge for Falklands War

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Chavez Vows Revenge for Falklands War

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Sep 2007, 21:21
  #21 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There's mineral rights in them thar waters ye know...

You rang?
 
Old 4th Sep 2007, 21:35
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
"There's mineral rights in them thar waters ye know"

Clearly then the US will invade as that's what the Americans do. NK may be coming off the axis of evil list if they give up the nukes, leaving a spot for the Malvinas/Falklands.
West Coast is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 21:37
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Punxsutawney
Age: 48
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clearly then the US will invade
I guess they will pour 50,000 troops into the area and mess that up as well.
1.4G is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 21:38
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
leaving a spot for the Malvinas/Falklands.
Ahhh... Good, Britain is now part of the axis of evil...

Duh...
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 21:46
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Since when did the Falklands/Malvina become Britain?

Dependent territories perhaps.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Britain
West Coast is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 21:52
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Falkland Islands is an Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom.

The Islands are internally self-governing with the exception of defence and foreign affairs, which remain the responsibility of the British Government. The Governor formally exercises executive authority on behalf of Her Majesty’s Government, although, in practice, policy decisions are made by the elected members of the Government.
Source

It's a tad helpful if you find the factually relevant information rather than just information that "seems" to prove your point...

PS: Great Britain = United Kingdom... In case you were confused...
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 22:00
  #27 (permalink)  
bad livin'
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Kitbag - one T boat and some Typhoons with associated tanking would give pause for thought. They'd have to get their men ashore by water or parachute...and the above options might make either approach very painful.
 
Old 4th Sep 2007, 22:24
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
"The Falkland Islands is an Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom"

So it's not Britain.

Just as Guam isn't the US.
West Coast is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 22:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
one T boat and some Typhoons with associated tanking would give pause for thought. They'd have to get their men ashore by water or parachute...
Sorry, didn't realise those assets were in the area right now to deter the naughty Argies Mind you I suppose they could just blockade the place.

Still, be interesting to see how we would get feet back on the ground if the air cover described in the first post on this thread is effective
Kitbag is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 22:33
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,141
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
PS: Great Britain = United Kingdom... In case you were confused...

Well no, actually.

United Kingdon = Great Britain (England, Scotland and wales) + N. Ireland.

I had great difficulty explaining the nuances of the England/GB/UK terminology as the UK delegate to one of the FAI Commisions.

It helped explaining that the 'Great' bit was to differentiate from 'Lesser' Britain, the NW bit of froggyland, rather than being the best country in the world (which was to be taken as implicit, and not needed in the name)..
Fitter2 is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 22:36
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
West Coast:

Read what you originally wrote... Please tell me you aren't silly enough to claim that an "overseas territory of the United Kingdom" could replace NK in the "Axis of Evil"...
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 22:38
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: UK
Posts: 74
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
AA

Great Britain = United Kingdom... In case you were confused...


Err.....no, actually. The United Kingdom consists of Great Britain AND Northern Ireland.....unless something has changed since I woz @ skool...many years ago, admittedly!
osbo is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 22:48
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great Britain = United Kingdom
Errr... You'd be surprised to see how many people in this world think that the two are mutually exclusive, hence I pointed out the "similarity".
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 23:11
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,812
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Now what did we do with those Sea Harriers? Oh!

Seriously it is unlikely anything could happen except as a result of gross stupidity by the UK, like withdrawing the Falklands garrison.

Back to Chavez - what do Brazil, Chile etc make of him?
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 23:40
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swindonshire
Posts: 2,007
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
IIRC, the Chileans aren't that keen. Chavez supports Bolivian claims for access to the sea, which would involve the creation of a corridor to the Pacific through Chilean territory.

Relations between Brazil and Venezuela appear to be worsening. There's a dispute over Mercosur membership between the two - Venezuela wants to become a member, but this needs the Brazilian senate to ratify the decision; The Brazilian senate feels that Venezuela hasn't yet met the entry conditions. Chavez has put his teddy on R5 to move from its holding position in the pram and is threatening to withdraw from Mercosur if the Brazilians don't give him what he wants. He's also unhappy that the Brazilian senate was a tad critical of his banning of the opposition TV station, while Brazilian industrialists have, in effect, warned the government to trust Chavez no further than they can throw him.

The TV dispute led to Chavez saying something rather rude about the Brazilian senators (I forget what), and this led to the ambassador being called in for a no coffee, no Ferrero Rocher chat with the Brazilian foreign minister.
Archimedes is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 23:59
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It will be bloody years before the Typhoon ends up at MPA. Why not buff up the F3 force for now to give a message to the numpty we mean business.
4 Tornado F3s and 1 Tanker is a F'ing lot of good to a load of Argies and Venezuelans attack the Islands plus or minus a Type 42 or 23.
Won't we be in the same situation as last time? Takes weeks for us to get there by ship. How many forces are stationed there for defence of the islands if the **** hits the fan?

going back to SHAR, why on earth didn't we fund a programme similar to the AV-8B+ where the GR9 upgrade could have included a new nose with the Blue Vixen radar fitted inside together with associated avionics fit. That way we would only have one type of Harrier, but both Ground attack and a very capable Air-Air platform all in one.
Or was this too complicated?
Razor61 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2007, 04:19
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The AV-8B / GR5/7/9 is a very space-limited, weight critical aircraft, and fitting the APG-65 radar meant removal of most of the specialized attack avionics (especially the "night attack" equipment.

That is why the USMC had 27 new-build B+ and 72 conversions to B+ done (last delivered 2003), but kept 61 B(NA) as non-radar versions.

Yes, money was a consideration, but it could have been found if the USMC really wanted it... especially after 9/11/2001.

Last edited by GreenKnight121; 6th Sep 2007 at 06:25.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2007, 06:10
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back to Chavez - what do Brazil, Chile etc make of him?
Chavez wouldn't support any involvement in taking back the FI simply to appeal to the rest of South America. The risks are too great to the little fella. At the moment, he's walking a fine enough line as it is. As has been said, the rest of S America doesn't trust him and it'd hardly be an astute move to ask the people to support him in assisting a foreign invasion as soon as he's been declared to in charge of the bananas for life. He'd last as long as the guests at a 'Meet the team!' JPA cheese and wine party by the sounds of it. The appeal to him, would be in highlighting rifts elsewhere. The Americans will have neither the time nor the inclination to 'help' us out this time, and the Europeans won't either. But I don't think that the cost benefit analysis is attractive enough to him.

It would mean too, effectively, the end to any South American alliances and he'd have a world of **** on his doorstep. At the moment, he has commonality with the rest of them down there, in that they all dislike the US. Also, he has enough wealth under Venezuala to be bothered about upsetting the balance of things down there. If the Argies had the FI, they'd be one step closer to getting their own oil supply. At the moment, Chavez does good business in selling to them.. why would he want to stop that and have a competitor on his doorstep at the same time? It'd be like el Fayed helping Mr Debenham fill out a Application for Planning Approval in Knightsbridge.

Disclaimer: Having said that, he is of course, completely demented, so all bets are off.
Al R is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2007, 06:48
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monde
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Argentinians already have their own oil supply from the east coast and elsewhere. Not sure how many buckets they've got left though.

Didn't someone once suggest giving them West Falkland and keeping East Falkland for those of Bristish origin? No? Well I'm suggesting it now. It's only fair. How would we feel if they claimed the Isle of Wight?

Last edited by Vie sans frontieres; 5th Sep 2007 at 06:50. Reason: Illiteracy
Vie sans frontieres is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2007, 08:44
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Uk
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Didn't someone once suggest giving them West Falkland and keeping East Falkland for those of Bristish origin? No? Well I'm suggesting it now."

who ever suggested it was an idiot

1. you've just handed them the perfect staging post to invade the rest of the islands

2. what about the wishes of the 150 people who live there?, at what numerical threshhold does it become right to force people to become part of a country they want nothing to do with
knowitall is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.